Document Detail

Prospective randomized comparison of anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23338665     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
PURPOSE: To determine if anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is superior to anatomic single-bundle reconstruction in restoring the stabilities and functions of the knee joint. METHODS: A prospective randomized clinical study was done to compare the results of 32 cases of anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction and 34 cases of anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction with average follow-up of 16.3 ± 3.1 months. Tunnel placements of all the cases were measured on 3D CT. Clinical results were collected after reconstruction; graft's appearance, meniscus status and cartilage state under arthroscopy were compared and analysed too. RESULTS: Tunnel placements, confirmed with 3D CT, were in the anatomic positions as described in literature both in SB and DB group. No differences were found between SB and DB groups in clinical outcome scores, pivot shift test and KT 1000 measurements (average side-to-side difference for anterior tibial translation was 0.7 mm in SB group and 1.0 mm in DB group). More than 70 % of the single-bundle graft and AM bundle graft in DB group appeared excellent, but only 44.1 % of PL bundle grafts in DB group were excellent and 11.8 % were in poor state. No new menisci tear was found either in SB or DB group, however, in DB group cartilage damages in medial patella-femoral joint occurred in 38.2 % cases. This rate was significantly higher than in the SB group which is only 9.3 %. CONCLUSION: Both single- and double-bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction can restore the knee's stability and functions very well. However, more incidences of poor PL status and medial patellar-femoral cartilage damage may occur in double-bundle ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Randomized controlled trial, Level I.
Yan Xu; Ying-Fang Ao; Jian-Quan Wang; Guo-Qing Cui
Related Documents :
19570535 - "no one has ever asked for it back!" a survey assessing the fate of reusable external f...
18343285 - Biomechanical characteristics of nonbridging external fixators for distal radius fractu...
11718735 - Observations concerning different patterns of bone healing using the point contact fixa...
2401545 - Performance of external fixation devices in femoral fractures; the ultimate challenge? ...
25036395 - Does surgically fixation of pubic fracture increase the stability of the operated poste...
8110515 - Hip fracture in malmö over three decades.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2013-1-23
Journal Detail:
Title:  Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1433-7347     ISO Abbreviation:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc     Publication Date:  2013 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-1-22     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9314730     Medline TA:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Institution of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd, Hai Dian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Can a tibial tunnel in ACL surgery be placed anatomically without impinging on the femoral notch? A ...
Next Document:  Local infiltration analgesia is comparable to femoral nerve block after anterior cruciate ligament r...