Document Detail


Prospective randomized trial of spinal saddle block versus periprostatic lignocaine for anesthesia during transrectal prostate biopsy.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20970825     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of spinal saddle block vs periprostatic lignocaine injection for anesthesia during transrectal prostate biopsy.
METHODS: A total of 75 patients were randomized to undergo prostate biopsy in 3 groups (n = 25). Group 1 had no anesthesia, group 2 had periprostatic lignocaine injection, and group 3 had spinal saddle block. All patients had sextant biopsy. The groups were assessed for pain, level of cooperativeness, willingness to have a repeat biopsy, complication rate, and the duration of the procedure.
RESULTS: The mean age in the groups were, respectively, 65.0 (±5.7) (group 1), 65.5 (±9.3) (group 2), and 68.6 (±6.3) (group 3) years. There was no statistical difference between the groups with respect to age, prostate volume, number of biopsies taken, and the prostate-specific antigen. The mean visual analog score in the groups was, respectively, 5.7 (±2.3), 4.6 (±2.3) and 0.7 (±1.6) for groups 1-3. The difference between groups 1 and 2 was not statistically significant (P = .181), whereas the difference between groups 2 and 3 and groups 1 and 3 was highly statistically significant (P = .000). There were also highly statistically significant differences in levels of cooperativeness and duration of the procedure between group 3 and groups 1 and 2. The differences between the groups with respect to complication rates and willingness to have a repeat biopsy were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Spinal saddle block was a more effective method of anesthesia than periprostatic lignocaine. It did not sacrifice the current outpatient/day case setting for prostate biopsy. It could be offered routinely to patients undergoing prostate biopsy.
Authors:
Anselm Okwudili Obi; Vincent Ugochukwu Okafor; Paul Ikem Nnodi
Related Documents :
10360505 - Combined transurethal resection and vaporization of the prostate using newly designed e...
10443725 - Continued improvement in pressure-flow parameters in men receiving finasteride for 2 ye...
22266605 - A novel biliary stent loaded with (125)i seeds in patients with malignant biliary obstr...
11696715 - Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the heilbronn technique: an analysis of the fir...
21683335 - Factors influencing outcomes of the treatment of allograft corneal rejection.
22090155 - Impact of pit tagging on recapture rates, body condition and reproductive success of wi...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2010-10-23
Journal Detail:
Title:  Urology     Volume:  77     ISSN:  1527-9995     ISO Abbreviation:  Urology     Publication Date:  2011 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-02-07     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0366151     Medline TA:  Urology     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  280-5     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Crown Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Department of Urology, Federal Medical Centre, Abakaliki, Ebonyi, Nigeria.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Emergent stenting after uncomplicated ureteroscopy: evaluation of 23 patients.
Next Document:  Single-incision Laparoscopic Nephrectomy and Heminephroureterectomy in Young Children Using Conventi...