Document Detail


Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: for the speaker or for the addressee?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  15680144     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Evidence has been mixed on whether speakers spontaneously and reliably produce prosodic cues that resolve syntactic ambiguities. And when speakers do produce such cues, it is unclear whether they do so "for" their addressees (the audience design hypothesis) or "for" themselves, as a by-product of planning and articulating utterances. Three experiments addressed these issues. In Experiments 1 and 3, speakers followed pictorial guides to spontaneously instruct addressees to move objects. Critical instructions (e.g., "Put the dog in the basket on the star") were syntactically ambiguous, and the referential situation supported either one or both interpretations. Speakers reliably produced disambiguating cues to syntactic ambiguity whether the situation was ambiguous or not. However, Experiment 2 suggested that most speakers were not yet aware of whether the situation was ambiguous by the time they began to speak, and so adapting to addressees' particular needs may not have been feasible in Experiment 1. Experiment 3 examined individual speakers' awareness of situational ambiguity and the extent to which they signaled structure, with or without addressees present. Speakers tended to produce prosodic cues to syntactic boundaries regardless of their addressees' needs in particular situations. Such cues did prove helpful to addressees, who correctly interpreted speakers' instructions virtually all the time. In fact, even when speakers produced syntactically ambiguous utterances in situations that supported both interpretations, eye-tracking data showed that 40% of the time addressees did not even consider the non-intended objects. We discuss the standards needed for a convincing test of the audience design hypothesis.
Authors:
Tanya Kraljic; Susan E Brennan
Related Documents :
17352554 - Multisensory exploration and object individuation in infancy.
1691874 - Phantom limbs and the concept of a neuromatrix.
23066334 - On the origins of disorganized attachment and internal working models: paper ii. an emp...
2410384 - Identification in the theory and technique of psychoanalysis. some thoughts on its fart...
14649594 - Infant weight and gestational age effects on thermoneutrality in the home environment.
12030424 - Biorhythms and possible central regulation of magnesium status, phototherapy, darkness ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Cognitive psychology     Volume:  50     ISSN:  0010-0285     ISO Abbreviation:  Cogn Psychol     Publication Date:  2005 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2005-01-31     Completed Date:  2005-04-05     Revised Date:  2009-01-16    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0241111     Medline TA:  Cogn Psychol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  194-231     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794-2500, United States. tkraljic@hotmail.com
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Analysis of Variance
Cues*
Female
Fixation, Ocular
Humans
Male
New York
Psycholinguistics
Reaction Time
Speech
Verbal Behavior*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Naïve deontics: a theory of meaning, representation, and reasoning.
Next Document:  Detection of HIV-1-specific CTL responses in Clade B infection with Clade C Peptides and not Clade B...