Document Detail


Propagation and perception of bioluminescence: factors affecting counterillumination as a cryptic strategy.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  15315939     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Many deep-sea species, particularly crustaceans, cephalopods, and fish, use photophores to illuminate their ventral surfaces and thus disguise their silhouettes from predators viewing them from below. This strategy has several potential limitations, two of which are examined here. First, a predator with acute vision may be able to detect the individual photophores on the ventral surface. Second, a predator may be able to detect any mismatch between the spectrum of the bioluminescence and that of the background light. The first limitation was examined by modeling the perceived images of the counterillumination of the squid Abralia veranyi and the myctophid fish Ceratoscopelus maderensis as a function of the distance and visual acuity of the viewer. The second limitation was addressed by measuring downwelling irradiance under moonlight and starlight and then modeling underwater spectra. Four water types were examined: coastal water at a depth of 5 m and oceanic water at 5, 210, and 800 m. The appearance of the counterillumination was more affected by the visual acuity of the viewer than by the clarity of the water, even at relatively large distances. Species with high visual acuity (0.11 degrees resolution) were able to distinguish the individual photophores of some counterilluminating signals at distances of several meters, thus breaking the camouflage. Depth and the presence or absence of moonlight strongly affected the spectrum of the background light, particularly near the surface. The increased variability near the surface was partially offset by the higher contrast attenuation at shallow depths, which reduced the sighting distance of mismatches. This research has implications for the study of spatial resolution, contrast sensitivity, and color discrimination in deep-sea visual systems.
Authors:
Sönke Johnsen; Edith A Widder; Curtis D Mobley
Related Documents :
11404439 - Hierarchical processing of horizontal disparity information in the visual forebrain of ...
6868389 - Effects of practice and the separation of test targets on foveal and peripheral stereoa...
4934209 - Binocular interaction fields of single units in the cat striate cortex.
17337029 - Apparent motion of monocular stimuli in different depth planes with lateral head moveme...
8762299 - Multiple matching of features in simple stereograms.
12005229 - Scale invariance in near space: pointing under influence of context.
19871919 - The nature of foveal dark adaptation.
7178799 - Power spectral analysis of auditory brain stem responses to pure tone stimuli.
2804649 - Laminar analysis of motion information processing in macaque v5.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Biological bulletin     Volume:  207     ISSN:  0006-3185     ISO Abbreviation:  Biol. Bull.     Publication Date:  2004 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2004-08-18     Completed Date:  2004-10-20     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  2984727R     Medline TA:  Biol Bull     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1-16     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Biology Department, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA. sjohnsen@duke.edu
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adaptation, Physiological*
Animals
Contrast Sensitivity / physiology
Decapodiformes / physiology
Fishes / physiology
Fourier Analysis
Luminescent Measurements*
Models, Biological*
Scattering, Radiation
Seawater / analysis*
Spectrum Analysis
Visual Acuity / physiology*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Role of p53 in cisplatin-induced tubular cell apoptosis: dependence on p53 transcriptional activity.
Next Document:  Effect of zooid spacing on bryozoan feeding success: is competition or facilitation more important?