Document Detail


Prokinetic therapy for feed intolerance in critical illness: one drug or two?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  17828038     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of combination therapy, with erythromycin and metoclopramide, to erythromycin alone in the treatment of feed intolerance in critically ill patients. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. SETTING: Mixed medical and surgical intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Seventy-five mechanically ventilated, medical patients with feed intolerance (gastric residual volume > or =250 mL). INTERVENTIONS: Patients received either combination therapy (n = 37; 200 mg of intravenous erythromycin twice daily + 10 mg of intravenous metoclopramide four times daily) or erythromycin alone (n = 38; 200 mg of intravenous erythromycin twice daily) in a prospective, randomized fashion. Gastric feeding was re-commenced and 6-hourly gastric aspirates performed. Patients were studied for 7 days. Successful feeding was defined as a gastric residual volume <250 mL with the feeding rate > or =40 mL/hr, over 7 days. Secondary outcomes included daily caloric intake, vomiting, postpyloric feeding, length of stay, and mortality. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Demographic data; use of inotropes, opioids, or benzodiazepines; and pretreatment gastric residual volume were similar between the two groups. The gastric residual volume was significantly lower after 24 hrs of treatment with combination therapy, compared with erythromycin alone (136 +/- 23 mL vs. 293 +/- 45 mL, p = .04). Over the 7 days, patients treated with combination therapy had greater feeding success, received more daily calories, and had a lower requirement for postpyloric feeding, compared with erythromycin alone. Tachyphylaxis occurred in both groups but was less with combination therapy. Sedation, higher pretreatment gastric residual volume, and hypoalbuminemia were significantly associated with a poor response. There was no difference in the length of hospital stay or mortality rate between the groups. Watery diarrhea was more common with combination therapy (20 of 37 vs. 10 of 38, p = .01) but was not associated with enteric infections, including Clostridium difficile. CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients with feed intolerance, combination therapy with erythromycin and metoclopramide is more effective than erythromycin alone in improving the delivery of nasogastric nutrition and should be considered as the first-line treatment.
Authors:
Nam Q Nguyen; Marianne Chapman; Robert J Fraser; Laura K Bryant; Carly Burgstad; Richard H Holloway
Related Documents :
24754798 - To infiltrate or not? acute effects of local anaesthetic in breast surgery.
21333268 - Impact of trichiasis surgery on physical functioning in ethiopian patients: star trial.
12474018 - Enteral nutrition in french institutionalized patients: a multicentric study.
15266308 - Immunoenhanced enteral nutrition, effect on inflammatory markers in head and neck cance...
21252608 - Allogeneic blood transfusion decreases with postoperative autotransfusion in hip and kn...
10945508 - Cefdinir versus cefaclor in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Critical care medicine     Volume:  35     ISSN:  0090-3493     ISO Abbreviation:  Crit. Care Med.     Publication Date:  2007 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2007-12-17     Completed Date:  2008-02-15     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0355501     Medline TA:  Crit Care Med     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  2561-7     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Adelaide, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia. qnguyen@mail.rah.sa.gov.au
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Antiemetics / therapeutic use*
Critical Illness
Double-Blind Method
Drug Therapy, Combination
Enteral Nutrition / adverse effects*
Erythromycin / therapeutic use*
Female
Gastrointestinal Agents / therapeutic use*
Humans
Male
Metoclopramide / therapeutic use*
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Antiemetics; 0/Gastrointestinal Agents; 114-07-8/Erythromycin; 364-62-5/Metoclopramide

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Differential recovery of behavioral status and brain function assessed with functional magnetic reso...
Next Document:  Intravenous infusion of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells improves myocardial function in a rat mod...