Document Detail


Prognostic significance of histologic grading in patients with prostate carcinoma who are assessed by the Gleason and World Health Organization grading systems in needle biopsies obtained prior to radiotherapy.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  11466684     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: The current study was conducted to evaluate and compare the impact of two major histologic grading systems on failure-free survival in patients with prostate carcinoma who are treated with definitive radiation. METHODS: Eligible patients for the current study had localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate (T1-4pN0M0, T3/4: 67%, median observation time: 69 months) and were treated with intent-to-cure external radiotherapy between 1989 and 1995. The specimens from 178 patients, obtained by needle biopsies, were reviewed simultaneously by two pathologists assigning World Health Organization (WHO) and Gleason grades. Three-tiered Gleason grouping distributed patients into three groups (those with a score < 7, those with a score of 7, and those with a score of 8--10), whereas two-tiered Gleason categorization distributed patients into two groups (those with a Gleason score of 7A, major 3 + minor 4 patients were added to the group of patients with a Gleason score < 7 and patients with a Gleason score of 7B, major 4 + minor 3 were added to the group of patients with a Gleason score of 8--10). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. A P value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: Three-tiered Gleason grouping resulted in a relatively even distribution of the patients (44 patients had a Gleason score < 7, 58 patients had a Gleason score of 7, and 76 patients had a Gleason score of 8--10) whereas 130 patients were determined to have Grade 2 tumors based on WHO criteria. Separating those patients with a Gleason score of 7 (score 3+4 vs. score 4+3) led to the two-tiered Gleason grouping (88 patients in the favorable group and 90 patients in the unfavorable group). The two-tiered Gleason grouping displayed differences with regard to failure-free survival with the lowest P values for all patients and separately for T1/2 versus T3/4 tumors. Together with T category and pretreatment prostate specific antigen, WHO grading, three-tiered Gleason grouping, and two-tiered Gleason grouping resulted in independent parameters in the Cox regression model. The proportional variance estimate confirmed the superior discrimination for survival of two-tiered Gleason grouping. CONCLUSIONS: The equal allocation of patients to subgroups based on the Gleason system helps the clinician to overcome the dilemma of overrepresentation of Grade 2 patients as occurs with WHO grading. The Gleason grading system and, most likely, the two-tiered Gleason grouping appear to result in better prognostic separation of patients referred to radiotherapy for relatively advanced primary tumors. Therefore the authors recommend the routine use of Gleason grading for these patients.
Authors:
W Lilleby; G Torlakovic; E Torlakovic; E Skovlund; S D Fosså
Related Documents :
9494604 - Alpha 1-antichymotrypsin-psa (act-psa): a useful marker in the differential diagnosis o...
12672544 - Cerebral microbleeds in binswanger's disease: a gradient-echo t2*-weighted magnetic res...
21309914 - Lugol chromo-endoscopy versus narrow band imaging for endoscopic screening of esophagea...
3863154 - The significance of ca19-9 tumor antigen in the serum of patients with carcinomas.
22686834 - Obesity in asthma: more neutrophilic inflammation as a possible explanation for a reduc...
6761414 - Urethral reconstruction in the young female using a perineal pedicle flap.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Cancer     Volume:  92     ISSN:  0008-543X     ISO Abbreviation:  Cancer     Publication Date:  2001 Jul 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2001-07-23     Completed Date:  2001-08-09     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0374236     Medline TA:  Cancer     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  311-9     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright 2001 American Cancer Society.
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Radiotherapy, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, the University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. Wolfgang.Lilleby@klinmed.uio.no
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adenocarcinoma / classification,  pathology*,  radiotherapy
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biopsy, Needle
Disease-Free Survival
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Prostatic Neoplasms / classification,  pathology*,  radiotherapy
Regression Analysis
World Health Organization

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  A prospective study of factors predicting clinically occult spinal cord compression in patients with...
Next Document:  Infertility treatment after conservative management of borderline ovarian tumors.