Document Detail


Productivity outcomes for recent grants and fellowships awarded by the American Osteopathic Association Bureau of Research.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  14527079     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
The objective of the present study was to evaluate productivity outcome measures for recent research grants and fellowships awarded through the American Osteopathic Association (AOA) Bureau of Research. Recipients of grants and fellowships that were awarded between 1995 and 2001 were contacted by mail, e-mail, or telephone and asked to provide information about publications, resulting grant awards, advances in clinical care, or other notable products that were generated from their projects. For grants funded between 1995 and 1998, 76% of principal investigators reported a notable product from their study. By contrast, for grants funded between 1999 and 2001, only 31% reported a notable outcome. This difference most likely can be attributed to the lag time between the awarding of a grant and actual completion of the project, the processing of the data, and the publication of the results. Several recipients of 1999-2001 grants were optimistic about eventually generating a notable product. Most (79%) of the 1995-2001 fellows met the requirements for successful completion of their project. Many fellows exceeded the minimal requirement by publishing their results, continuing research activity, attracting extramural grant monies, or entering an academic position. It appeared that a much larger proportion of osteopathic fellows went on to academic careers than their counterparts who did not have fellowship training. From 1995 to 2001, the AOA Bureau of Research awarded dollars 3,072,140 in research grants and fellowships. To date, these awards have helped the recipients bring an additional dollars 5,659,329 of extramural funds for research at osteopathic institutions. The Bureau of Research grant and fellowship programs have been successful both scientifically and in terms of financial outcomes.
Authors:
Richard C Rose; Walter C Prozialeck
Related Documents :
23834999 - Use of mobile devices to answer online surveys: implications for research.
20515269 - What is a biomarker? research investments and lack of clinical integration necessitate ...
18786269 - Recognizing mid-career productivity: the 2008 retrovirology prize, call for nomination.
24526079 - The need to improve.
24920199 - A fine balance.
22981509 - Skin regeneration scaffolds: a multimodal bottom-up approach.
18287699 - Graingenes.
10185429 - The dawn of the e-lance economy.
24016819 - Defining yoga-nidra: traditional accounts, physiological research, and future directions.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association     Volume:  103     ISSN:  0098-6151     ISO Abbreviation:  J Am Osteopath Assoc     Publication Date:  2003 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2003-10-06     Completed Date:  2003-11-17     Revised Date:  2007-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7503065     Medline TA:  J Am Osteopath Assoc     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  435-40     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
American Osteopathic Association in Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA. rrose@aoa-net.org
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Efficiency*
Humans
Osteopathic Medicine*
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Research Support as Topic / economics,  organization & administration*
Societies, Medical / organization & administration
United States

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Development of the Attitudes Toward Osteopathic Principles and Practice Scale (ATOPPS): preliminary ...
Next Document:  Mechanisms of liver injury: an overview.