Document Detail

Probabilistic cost estimates for climate change mitigation.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23282364     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
For more than a decade, the target of keeping global warming below 2 °C has been a key focus of the international climate debate. In response, the scientific community has published a number of scenario studies that estimate the costs of achieving such a target. Producing these estimates remains a challenge, particularly because of relatively well known, but poorly quantified, uncertainties, and owing to limited integration of scientific knowledge across disciplines. The integrated assessment community, on the one hand, has extensively assessed the influence of technological and socio-economic uncertainties on low-carbon scenarios and associated costs. The climate modelling community, on the other hand, has spent years improving its understanding of the geophysical response of the Earth system to emissions of greenhouse gases. This geophysical response remains a key uncertainty in the cost of mitigation scenarios but has been integrated with assessments of other uncertainties in only a rudimentary manner, that is, for equilibrium conditions. Here we bridge this gap between the two research communities by generating distributions of the costs associated with limiting transient global temperature increase to below specific values, taking into account uncertainties in four factors: geophysical, technological, social and political. We find that political choices that delay mitigation have the largest effect on the cost-risk distribution, followed by geophysical uncertainties, social factors influencing future energy demand and, lastly, technological uncertainties surrounding the availability of greenhouse gas mitigation options. Our information on temperature risk and mitigation costs provides crucial information for policy-making, because it clarifies the relative importance of mitigation costs, energy demand and the timing of global action in reducing the risk of exceeding a global temperature increase of 2 °C, or other limits such as 3 °C or 1.5 °C, across a wide range of scenarios.
Joeri Rogelj; David L McCollum; Andy Reisinger; Malte Meinshausen; Keywan Riahi
Related Documents :
12939784 - Prediction of cancer incidence in the nordic countries: empirical comparison of differe...
23542414 - Predicting the effect of ionising radiation on biological populations: testing of a non...
24636944 - Exposure method development for risk assessment to cosmetic products using a standard c...
23376514 - Modeling vulnerability of groundwater to pollution under future scenarios of climate ch...
24019464 - Decisions on the fly in cellular sensory systems.
15621314 - Analysis of motor control and behavior in multi agent systems by means of artificial ne...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Nature     Volume:  493     ISSN:  1476-4687     ISO Abbreviation:  Nature     Publication Date:  2013 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-01-03     Completed Date:  2013-02-06     Revised Date:  2014-02-21    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0410462     Medline TA:  Nature     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  79-83     Citation Subset:  IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Conservation of Energy Resources / methods*,  trends*
Global Warming / economics,  prevention & control*
Models, Theoretical
Comment In:
Nature. 2013 Jan 3;493(7430):35-6   [PMID:  23282360 ]
Erratum In:
Nature. 2014 Feb 20;506(7488):396

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Giant magnetized outflows from the centre of the Milky Way.
Next Document:  The oxidation state of the mantle and the extraction of carbon from Earth's interior.