Document Detail


Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after open common bile duct exploration.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  17253565     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Between 5% and 11% of people undergoing cholecystectomy have common bile duct stones. Open common bile duct exploration is an important operation when endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography fails or when expertise for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is not available. The optimal method for performing open common bile duct exploration is unclear.
OBJECTIVES: The aim is to assess the benefits and harms of primary closure versus routine T-tube drainage in open common bile duct exploration for common bile duct stones.
SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded until January 2006.
SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered for inclusion all randomised clinical trials comparing primary closure (with or without biliary stent) versus T-tube drainage after open common bile duct exploration.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We collected the data on the characteristics, methodological quality, mortality, morbidity, operating time, and hospital stay from each trial. We analysed the data with both the fixed-effect and the random-effects model using RevMan Analysis. For each outcome we calculated the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on intention-to-treat analysis.
MAIN RESULTS: We included five trials with 324 patients randomised: 165 to primary closure without stent and 159 to T-tube. Three of the five trials were considered to have adequate methodological quality, but all lacked blinded outcome assessment. The primary closure group had significantly lower positive bile culture (3 trials, OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.45) and wound infection (5 trials, OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.56). When only trials with high methodological quality were included, there was no statistically significant difference in any of the outcomes except positive bile culture, which became non-significant when the random-effects model was used. The deaths of the three patients in the T-tube group were directly related to surgery and sepsis. Bile peritonitis was higher in the T-tube group (2.9%) than in the primary closure group (1%) (not statistically significant). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the T-tube group compared with the primary closure group in three of the four trials, which reported on the hospital stay. The only trial comparing primary closure with stent (37 patients) versus T-tube drainage (44 patients) did not reveal any statistically significant difference in any of the reported outcomes (mortality, re-operations, wound infection, and hospital stay). There was one case of stent migration, which could not be retrieved after two attempts of ERCP.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Primary closure after common bile duct exploration seems at least as safe as T-tube drainage. We need randomised trials that assess whether stents may offer benefits.
Authors:
K S Gurusamy; K Samraj
Related Documents :
8379605 - Polyp guideline: diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance for patients with nonfamilial c...
8617415 - The "optional cross-over design" for randomized controlled trials.
15085205 - Acromioclavicular dislocation: conservative or surgical therapy.
12804465 - Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin.
15057585 - Local perianal block for anal surgery.
2779025 - Postoperative infection prophylaxis for upper gastrointestinal tract surgery--a prospec...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Meta-Analysis; Review     Date:  2007-01-24
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Cochrane database of systematic reviews     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1469-493X     ISO Abbreviation:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev     Publication Date:  2007  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2007-01-26     Completed Date:  2007-05-08     Revised Date:  2013-07-05    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100909747     Medline TA:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  CD005640     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Royal Free Hospital, General Surgery, Pond Street, London, UK, NW3 2QG. kurinchi2k@hotmail.com
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Choledocholithiasis / surgery*
Common Bile Duct / surgery*
Drainage / adverse effects,  instrumentation*
Humans
Postoperative Complications / etiology
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Stents
Comments/Corrections
Update In:
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;6:CD005640   [PMID:  23794200 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Pemetrexed disodium in combination with cisplatin versus other cytotoxic agents or supportive care f...
Next Document:  Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct stone exploration.