Document Detail


Primary angioplasty versus prehospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction: a randomised study.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  12243916     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Although both prehospital fibrinolysis and primary angioplasty provide a clinical benefit over in-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction, they have not been directly compared. Our aim was to find out whether primary angioplasty was better than prehospital fibrinolysis. METHODS: We did a randomised multicentre trial of 840 patients (of 1200 planned) who presented within 6 h of acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation, initially managed by mobile emergency-care units. We assigned patients to prehospital fibrinolysis (n=419) with accelerated alteplase or primary angioplasty (n=421), and transferred all to a centre with access to emergency angioplasty. Our primary endpoint was a composite of death, non-fatal reinfarction, and non-fatal disabling stroke at 30 days. Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: The median delay between onset of symptoms and treatment was 130 min in the prehospital-fibrinolysis group and 190 min (time to first balloon inflation) in the primary-angioplasty group. Rescue angioplasty was done in 26% of the patients in the fibrinolysis group. The rate of the primary endpoint was 8.2% (34 patients) in the prehospital-fibrinolysis group and 6.2% (26 patients) in the primary-angioplasty group (risk difference 1.96, 95% CI -1.53 to 5.46). 16 (3.8%) patients assigned prehospital fibrinolysis and 20 (4.8%) assigned primary angioplasty died (p=0.61). INTERPRETATION: A strategy of primary angioplasty was not better than a strategy of prehospital fibrinolysis (with transfer to an interventional facility for possible rescue angioplasty) in patients presenting with early myocardial infarction.
Authors:
Eric Bonnefoy; Frédéric Lapostolle; Alain Leizorovicz; Gabriel Steg; Eugène P McFadden; Pierre Yves Dubien; Simon Cattan; Eric Boullenger; Jacques Machecourt; Jean-Micel Lacroute; Jean Cassagnes; François Dissait; Paul Touboul;
Related Documents :
2932396 - Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in left main stem coronary stenosis: a f...
11407666 - Prevalence of helicobacter pylori infection in coronary artery disease and effect of it...
2961456 - A new technique for angioplasty of occluded coronary arteries and bypass grafts, not as...
2220626 - Percutaneous excimer laser coronary angioplasty.
9594856 - Cardioprotection by activation of no/cgmp pathway after cardioplegic arrest and 8-hour ...
2932396 - Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in left main stem coronary stenosis: a f...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Lancet     Volume:  360     ISSN:  0140-6736     ISO Abbreviation:  Lancet     Publication Date:  2002 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2002-09-23     Completed Date:  2002-10-09     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  2985213R     Medline TA:  Lancet     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  825-9     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Coronary Care Unit, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Aged
Angioplasty, Transluminal, Percutaneous Coronary* / statistics & numerical data
Cause of Death
Combined Modality Therapy
Emergency Medical Services* / statistics & numerical data
Female
France
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Mobile Health Units
Myocardial Infarction / mortality,  therapy*
Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)
Recurrence
Survival Rate
Thrombolytic Therapy* / statistics & numerical data
Time and Motion Studies
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
Lancet. 2002 Sep 14;360(9336):814-6   [PMID:  12243913 ]
Lancet. 2003 Jan 4;361(9351):77-8; author reply 78-9   [PMID:  12517491 ]
Lancet. 2003 Jan 4;361(9351):78; author reply 78-9   [PMID:  12517492 ]
ACP J Club. 2003 Mar-Apr;138(2):31   [PMID:  12614116 ]
Lancet. 2003 Feb 22;361(9358):700; author reply 701   [PMID:  12606194 ]
Lancet. 2003 Feb 22;361(9358):700-1; author reply 701   [PMID:  12606193 ]
Lancet. 2003 Mar 15;361(9361):966-7; author reply 967-8   [PMID:  12648990 ]
Lancet. 2003 Mar 15;361(9361):965-6; author reply 967-8   [PMID:  12648988 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  First results from the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS-I): a randomised prevent...
Next Document:  Potential effect of population and climate changes on global distribution of dengue fever: an empiri...