Document Detail

Prilocaine versus plain or buffered lidocaine for local anesthesia in laceration repair: randomized double-blind comparison.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  14652885     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
AIM: To compare the effectiveness of 2% prilocaine plain solution, 1% lidocaine hydrochloride, and 1% buffered lidocaine in local anesthesia and pain reduction during injection in laceration repair. METHODS: A double-blind randomized prospective comparison study included 183 consecutive eligible adult patients with simple lacerations, admitted to the emergency department between January 2001 and June 2002. Each of the three groups of patients received different local anesthetic before laceration suturing (1% lidocaine, 2% prilocaine, or buffered 1% lidocaine). The patients were asked to assess the pain intensity on a 0-100 numerical rating scale at the site of needle entry into the skin (P1), immediately after the completion of injection (P2), and after the first puncture of the suturing needle (P3). The differences among the three patient groups were tested with one-way analysis of variance and chi-square test. RESULTS: The three groups of 61 patients each (one patient declined from prilocaine group) did not significantly differ in mean P1 scores (29.1+/-20.9 in the prilocaine, 32.2+/-22.9 in the lidocaine, and 33.2+/-21.7 in the buffered lidocaine group; p=0.56). Mean P2 scores were highest in the prilocaine group (24.0+/-16.0), followed by lidocaine (20.9+/-14.9) and buffered lidocaine (16.1+/-11.3) groups (p=0.007). Mean P3 score was significantly lower in the lidocaine group (13.4+/-11.3) then in the prilocaine (18.4+/-13.1) and buffered lidocaine (20.4+/-16.2) groups (p=0.014). The number of patients who required additional anesthetic administration in each group was not significantly different (p=0.09). CONCLUSION: Injection of 1% lidocaine was associated with lower pain ratings on suturing needle puncture than with 2% prilocaine or buffered 1% lidocaine.
Ozgur Karcioglu; Hakan Topacoglu; Cuneyt Ayrik; D Niyazi Ozucelik; Suna Soysal
Related Documents :
10453775 - Electrophysiologic recovery after vitamin e-deficient neuropathy.
19762765 - The analgesic effect of paracetamol when added to lidocaine for intravenous regional an...
8672385 - Prilocaine 3% is superior to a mixture of bupivacaine and lignocaine for peribulbar ana...
11575415 - Comparison of two neurostimulation techniques for axillary brachial plexus blockade.
3306545 - Corneal epithelial healing after penetrating keratoplasty using topical healon versus b...
7489265 - Short-term treatment outcome study for the management of temporomandibular joint closed...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Croatian medical journal     Volume:  44     ISSN:  0353-9504     ISO Abbreviation:  Croat. Med. J.     Publication Date:  2003 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2003-12-03     Completed Date:  2004-02-04     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9424324     Medline TA:  Croat Med J     Country:  Croatia    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  716-20     Citation Subset:  IM    
Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, 35340 Inciralti, Izmir, Turkey.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Anesthetics, Local*
Double-Blind Method
Lacerations / surgery*
Lidocaine / therapeutic use*
Middle Aged
Prilocaine / therapeutic use*
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Anesthetics, Local; 137-58-6/Lidocaine; 721-50-6/Prilocaine

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Management of cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetic patients undergoing coronary angiograph...
Next Document:  Predictive value of assessment of general movements for neurological development of high-risk preter...