Document Detail

Prevalence and risk factors of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in a Chinese retiree cohort.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23153099     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
BACKGROUND: Data about prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux diseases (GERD) from Asian populations are still scarce. To provide additional data on prevalence of GERD and investigate its potential risk factors, we performed this cross-sectional study in the Taizhou Retiree Cohort.
METHODS: After physical examination, the participants were asked whether they suffered with heartburn or acid regurgitation in the last 12 months by trained interviewers, and if yes, the severity and frequency of the symptoms were recorded. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations of obesity and other risk factors with GERD were derived from logistic regression models.
RESULTS: 8831 retirees completed the questionnaire and physical examination. In total 150 (1.7%) reported the symptoms occurring at least once per week within the last 12 months before the interview. Compared with subjects without GERD, having a history of diabetes mellitus (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.4-3.5), hypertension (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0-2.1), gastritis (OR 8.2, 95% CI 5.8-11.5), peptic ulcer (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.8-6.1) and high triglyceride level (≥1.81mmol/L) (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.4) were associated with a significantly increased risk of GERD. However, there was no significant association between body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio or waist alone, smoking, consumption of alcohol & tea, and the occurrence of reflux symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with Western populations, the prevalence of GERD in this Chinese retiree cohort is low. A history of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, gastritis, peptic ulcer or hypertriglyceridaemia increases GERD risk in this population.
Tiantian Chen; Ming Lu; Xiaofeng Wang; Yajun Yang; Juan Zhang; Li Jin; Weimin Ye
Related Documents :
23711359 - Self-reported risk factors for chlamydia: a survey of pharmacy-based emergency contrace...
23144799 - Environmental and animal characteristics as factors associated with american cutaneous ...
8849629 - Lifestyle incongruity and adult blood pressure in western samoa.
23228569 - Risk factors associated with repetition of self-harm in black and minority ethnic (bme)...
23035969 - Two unconventional risk factors for major adverse cardiovascular events in subjects wit...
23838769 - Prevalence and risk factors for myopia in a rural korean population.
16009979 - First-time inversion ankle ligament trauma: the effects of sex, level of competition, a...
16598069 - Variation in genes relevant to aromatic hydrocarbon metabolism and the risk of adult br...
15824169 - Association of susceptibility alleles in elac2/hpc2, rnasel/hpc1, and msr1 with prostat...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2012-11-15
Journal Detail:
Title:  BMC gastroenterology     Volume:  12     ISSN:  1471-230X     ISO Abbreviation:  BMC Gastroenterol     Publication Date:  2012  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-02-18     Completed Date:  2013-06-14     Revised Date:  2013-07-11    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100968547     Medline TA:  BMC Gastroenterol     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  161     Citation Subset:  IM    
Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Aged, 80 and over
Body Mass Index
China / epidemiology
Confidence Intervals
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diabetes Mellitus / epidemiology
Gastritis / epidemiology
Gastroesophageal Reflux / epidemiology*
Heartburn / epidemiology*
Hypertension / epidemiology
Hypertriglyceridemia / epidemiology
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux / epidemiology*
Logistic Models
Middle Aged
Obesity / epidemiology
Odds Ratio
Peptic Ulcer / epidemiology
Risk Factors

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): BMC Gastroenterol
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): BMC Gastroenterol
ISSN: 1471-230X
Publisher: BioMed Central
Article Information
Download PDF
Copyright ©2012 Chen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Received Day: 8 Month: 6 Year: 2012
Accepted Day: 13 Month: 11 Year: 2012
collection publication date: Year: 2012
Electronic publication date: Day: 15 Month: 11 Year: 2012
Volume: 12First Page: 161 Last Page: 161
PubMed Id: 23153099
ID: 3573958
Publisher Id: 1471-230X-12-161
DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-12-161

Prevalence and risk factors of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in a Chinese retiree cohort
Tiantian Chen12 Email:
Ming Lu1234 Email:
Xiaofeng Wang34 Email:
Yajun Yang34 Email:
Juan Zhang4 Email:
Li Jin34 Email:
Weimin Ye45 Email:
1Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China
2Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China
3MOE Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China
4China Medical City Institute of Health Sciences, Taizhou, Jiangsu, 225300, China
5Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 17177, Sweden


Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic disease that is associated with a range of troublesome symptoms, which can in turn have a significant impact on health-related quality of life. Western countries have experienced GERD epidemic in recent decades; a systematic review article concluded that the prevalence of GERD was 10-20% in Western countries [1]. Recently, the prevalence of GERD has been reported to increase rapidly in Asia [2-5]. However, studies on Asian populations are still scarce.

There is a widespread notion that obesity and abdominal obesity may increase the risk of GERD, especially in Western populations [6-9]. High body mass index (BMI) is associated with a dose-dependently increased risk for GERD, erosive esophagitis, and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Several studies have reported that the adverse effect of obesity on GERD is through mechanical alterations at the esophagogastric junction [10,11]. However, since not every obese patient develops GERD, the pathogenesis must be multifactorial and cannot be explained by a single physiological parameter. Additional observations demonstrated the association between GERD and metabolic risk factors including hypertension, hypertriglyceridaemia and diabetes mellitus [12-14]. There is also suggestive relationship between GERD and peptic ulcer and gastritis [15,16], but the results are not consistent.

In this study, we therefore intended to investigate the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and to determine whether BMI, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and other factors are associated with the symptoms in the Taizhou Retiree Cohort.

The study cohort and data collection

Taizhou Longitudinal Study phase II (retiree cohort) was started from December of 2007, detailed description of study methods has been published previously [17], Briefly, all retirees who registered in the Social Insurance Bureau of Hailing (a district of Taizhou city), were invited to undergo a medical examination and their blood samples were collected for testing serum lipid, glucose and other biochemical profile. Information on demographic characteristics, lifestyle, as well as history of major chronic diseases was also collected for each participant. A simplified questionnaire about gastroesophageal reflux symptoms was added since September of 2008 and used till the end of enrollment, August 2009 [18,19]. The trained interviewers asked the participants whether or not they suffered with heartburn or acid regurgitation in the past 12 months, and if yes, the frequency of the symptoms, and the age the symptoms started. Heartburn and acid regurgitation are the cardinal symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease, and the use of questionnaires to assess these symptoms is well validated as a reliable measurement of the true occurrence of reflux [20,21]. Symptom of “heartburn” was defined as “the burning sensation behind breast bone”, and “acid regurgitation” was defined as “a bitter or sour tasting fluid coming into the throat or chest”. Symptom frequency was reported as: less than once per month, once per month, once per week, 2-3 times per week, 3-4 times per week or daily. We also asked whether the symptoms affected subjects’ daily life including sleep, dietary habits and physical activity. The influences of the of symptoms were reported as negligible, mild (almost can be ignored), moderate (cannot be ignored but can be tolerated), severe (affects normal daily life) and very severe (markedly, affects normal daily life). A summary severity score was then created by taking max value of the influences, and grouping negligible and mild category together. Participants were also asked whether they took medication for their symptoms, such as H2-receptor antagonist (H2Ra) or proton pump inhibitors (PPI).

Exposure assessment

Body weight, height, waist and hip circumference were measured by trained staff. The waist circumference was measured midway between the caudal point of the costal arch as palpated laterally and the iliac crest. BMI (kg/m2) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by square of height (m). WHR was defined as waist divided by hip circumference. Further, we categorized BMI into three groups, <24.0, 24.0-27.9 and ≥28.0. Overweight was defined as BMI between 24.0 and 27.9, and obesity was defined as BMI ≥28.0 according to the definition proposed by Working Group on Obesity in China [22].

Abdominal obesity was defined as women with a waist of ≥ 88 cm or man with a waist of ≥ 92 cm (both were upper quarter of waist accordingly). Women with a WHR of ≥ 0.89 or man with a WHR of ≥ 0.95 were also defined as central obesity.

Smoking status was categorized into three groups: ever smoked but quit now, current smokers and never smokers. Participants who reported an average frequency of alcohol intake of over 4 times per month were regarded as regular drinkers; tea drinkers were defined as at least one cup per day.

Participants were also asked to report their history of diseases (with diagnosis from a hospital), including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, tumor, asthma, gastritis, peptic ulcer, hepatitis, tuberculosis and gallstone. Medications taken by participants regularly were also recorded.

Statistical analysis

We defined GERD cases as ever experiencing symptoms of heartburn and/or regurgitation at least once per week. The control group comprised of those without reported GERD.

Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association of potential risk factors with GERD were derived from logistic regression models. All analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). Two-sided P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. The study was approved by the Human Ethics Committee of Fudan University. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.


From August 2008 to the end of baseline enrollment (Aug 2009), 8867 retirees aged 40 to 93 years completed the questionnaire and physical examination. In the procedure of data cleaning, we deleted 36 records for incomplete age, weight or height. Cohort demographic characteristics are presented in Table 1. Among 8831 participants (with a mean age of 62.5±8.3 years), 64.9% were females and females tended to have lower education level (primary school or lower, female: 60.7% vs. male: 41.4%), and more likely to be blue collar workers (93.9% vs. 79.6%).

Among these 8831 participants, only 158 (1.8%) reported ever having symptom of heartburn, 907 (10.3%) reported ever having symptom of acid regurgitation. Among all these symptomatic subjects, 499 (5.7%) had reflux symptom less than once per month, 281 (3.2%) reported once per month, 72 (0.8%) once per week, 55 (0.6%) several times per week, and 23 (0.3%) daily (Table 1). For the age group 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80+, the prevalence rates were 12.8%, 11.6%, 10.2%, 8.8%, and 10.0%, respectively. For women, the prevalence in each age group was: 12.4%, 11.2%, 11.9%, 10.8% and 9.9%. For men, the prevalence was: 14.8%, 14.8%, 8.3%, 7.2% and 10.2%, respectively.

For further analyses, we defined the 150 (1.7%) participants who reported the symptoms (either heartburn or acid regurgitation) at least once a week as GERD cases. Severity and frequency of the symptoms among the 150 cases and the medications they took are presented in Table 2. We deleted 780 participants who reported having the symptom once per month or less to avoid bias from misclassification. The rest of 7901 (89.5%) participants, who reported having neither heartburn nor acid regurgitation, as well as not taking any anti-acids, were considered as controls.

Obesity related factors

Compared with subjects with normal weight, overweight subjects (BMI 24.0-27.9 kg/m2) had a multivariable-adjusted OR of 1.0 (95%CI 0.7-1.4) for developing the symptoms and the corresponding OR was 0.7 (95%CI 0.4-1.2) for obese subjects (BMI ≥28.0 kg/m2) (Table 3). Similarly, waist-to-hip ratio or waist alone did not show any significant association with the symptoms (Table 3).

Lifestyle related factors

Smoking was not associated with any change in the risk of GERD. There was also no significant association between alcohol drinking, tea drinking and the occurrence of reflux symptoms (Table 4).

Past history of diseases

Subjects with self-reported diabetes mellitus were more likely to have report the symptoms, with a multivariable-adjusted OR of 2.2 (95% CI 1.4-3.5). Hypertension was also strongly associated with the development of the symptoms and the corresponding OR was 1.4 (95% CI 1.0-2.1) (Table 5).

Seven hundred and twenty participants reported having chronic gastritis. Compared with those without, subjects with chronic gastritis have an unadjusted OR of 8.5 (95% CI 6.1-11.8) to report GERD symptom. This relation remained stable after further adjustment for all covariates, with an OR of 8.2 (95% CI 5.8-11.5) (Table 5).

Similarly, retirees who had a history of peptic ulcer tended to be more prone to report the reflux symptoms, with an unadjusted OR of 5.1 (95% CI 3.0-8.7), and the association remained strong after multivariable-adjustment, with an OR of 3.3 (95% CI 1.8-6.1) (Table 5).

High serum TG (≥1.81mmol/l) was significantly associated with the presence of GERD (OR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.3-3.3). This relation remained stable after further adjustment for all covariates, with an OR of 2.0 (95% CI 1.2-3.4) (Table 5).


This population-based study on the epidemiology of GERD surveyed a total of 8867 retired individuals in China. The overall prevalence of GERD in the present study was 1.7% which was lower than that in previous Chinese population-based surveys using a variety of definitions of GERD. A possible explanation for this difference is that the participants in this study were all retirees who did not have much psychological stress. The occurrence and response to treatment of GERD were reported to be associated with stress [23]. In addition, the study subjects in several previous studies were patients who underwent endoscopy in medical centers or those who attended health screening. It is well known that subjects with gastrointestinal symptoms are more likely to go for this kind of examination.

A clear association between GERD and obesity has been found in Western countries [6,9]. But we did not find an association between obesity and GERD. Previous population-based studies on the association between GERD and BMI in China have also reported inconsistent results [16,24]. In this study, we assessed the association between GERD and abdominal obesity (indicated by waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio), but the results did not show any significant association between central obesity and the reflux symptoms. This could potentially be explained by relatively low prevalence of obesity in China.

In the current study, we found an association between diabetes mellitus and GERD. This is consistent with the previous studies performed in Japan [13] and Korea [25,26]. A Korean study reported that about 23.1% of the patients with type II diabetes experienced at least weekly typical GERD symptoms [25]. Another study showed that the prevalence of GERD symptoms in diabetes patients was 41% [14], which was higher than the reported prevalence in the general population. There are several possible mechanisms underlying diabetes-related GERD. Some studies have shown that many gastrointestinal symptoms in diabetes patients are linked to motor dysfunction and that the neuropathy in diabetes patients may play an important role on the development of GERD symptoms. Autonomic nervous disorder in diabetes patients might cause a certain degree of gastric dysmotility which may increase intragastric distension and lead to a higher incidence of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation [25].

Among the individual components of metabolic syndrome, an elevated level of serum TG was a significant predictive factor for the GERD. This result is consistent with previous studies about metabolic syndrome and GERD or erosive esophagitis [12,27,28]; however, a Japanese study did not find such an association between elevated serum TG and erosive esophagitis [13]. It has been reported that hypertriglyceridemia is associated with increased insulin resistance [29] and chronic Helicobacter pylori infections which was suggested to be a protective factor for erosive esophagitis can modify the serum lipid profile [30,31]. Therefore, elevated serum TG levels may be just an epiphenomenon accompanying other etiologic factors.

Hypertension was found, after adjusting for BMI, to be associated with GERD. In a Japanese study, hypertension and hyperglycaemia were independent risk factors for erosive esophagitis [13]. In a Korean population, the presence of metabolic syndrome and a higher visceral adipose tissue area were suggested as risk factors for esophagitis [27]. Consistent with the above, we found hypertension was a risk factor for symptom-defined GERD, but we did not investigate drug therapy of the participants in the present study. Calcium antagonists used to treat hypertension decrease the lower esophageal sphincter pressure and inhibit muscle contraction in the esophagus itself [32]. In China, calcium antagonists are widely used to treat hypertension, so it is possible that antihypertensive therapy might explain the findings in our study.

The current study supports an association of GERD with a history of peptic ulcer disease and gastritis. A large population-based study on the epidemiology of GERD across five regions in China also reported an association between GERD and peptic ulcer and gastritis [16]. In contrast, a study performed in Finland found a protective effect for gastritis against GERD [15]. However, it is important to distinguish between clinically diagnosed gastritis and the patient-reported history of gastritis which was used in the current study. In China, “gastritis” generally indicates upper gastrointestinal discomfort and a diagnosis is unlikely to be based on endoscopic examination biopsy or serum pepsinogen measurement. The major limitation of our study is that the medical history of participants was self-reported is the biggest limitation of our study, but it should be noted that it is a standard practice in China for patients to keep their own medical records which, in some extent, may reduce the impact of this limitation.


This study showed the prevalence of GERD in this retiree cohort is lower than that in Western populations, and its occurrence is independent of obesity or abdominal obesity. However, elevated level of serum TG, a medical history of hypertension, diabetes, peptic ulcer disease and gastritis are associated with an increased risk of developing GERD in this population. Further studies are needed to more fully elucidate potential mechanisms underlying these relationships.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

ML, LJ, WY, XW and YY made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study. TC and ML performed the statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. WY, ML and TC have been involved in revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. JZ participated in data collection. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:


This work was supported by a grant from NSFC (81072358), a grant from SDSTC (2012GSF11857) and a grant from JSSTSP (BE2011763). The authors’ work was independent of the funding providers.

Dent J,El-Serag HB,Wallander MA,Johansson S,Epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic reviewGutYear: 20055471071710.1136/gut.2004.05182115831922
Goh KL,Chang CS,Fock KM,Ke M,Park HJ,Lam SK,Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in AsiaJ Gastroenterol HepatolYear: 20001523023810.1046/j.1440-1746.2000.02148.x10764021
Lim LG,Ho KY,Gastroesophageal reflux disease at the turn of millenniumWorld J GastroenterolYear: 200392135213614562363
Goh KL,Changing epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease in the Asian-Pacific region: an overviewJ Gastroenterol HepatolYear: 200419Suppl 3S22S2515324378
Fujimoto K,Review article: prevalence and epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in JapanAliment Pharmacol TherYear: 200420Suppl 85815575864
Nilsson M,Johnsen R,Ye W,Hveem K,Lagergren J,Obesity and estrogen as risk factors for gastroesophageal reflux symptomsJAMAYear: 2003290667210.1001/jama.290.1.6612837713
Hampel H,Abraham NS,El-Serag HB,Meta-analysis: obesity and the risk for gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complicationsAnn Intern MedYear: 200514319921116061918
Jacobson BC,Somers SC,Fuchs CS,Kelly CP,Camargo CA Jr,Body-mass index and symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux in womenN Engl J MedYear: 20063542340234810.1056/NEJMoa05439116738270
Corley DA,Kubo A,Zhao W,Abdominal obesity, ethnicity and gastro-oesophageal reflux symptomsGutYear: 20075675676210.1136/gut.2006.10941317047097
Wu JC,Mui LM,Cheung CM,Chan Y,Sung JJ,Obesity is associated with increased transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxationGastroenterologyYear: 200713288388910.1053/j.gastro.2006.12.03217324403
Sise A,Friedenberg FK,A comprehensive review of gastroesophageal reflux disease and obesityObes RevYear: 2008919420310.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00459.x18179614
Lee YC,Yen AM,Tai JJ,Chang SH,Lin JT,Chiu HM,Wang HP,Wu MS,Chen TH,The effect of metabolic risk factors on the natural course of gastro-oesophageal reflux diseaseGutYear: 20095817418110.1136/gut.2008.16230518936105
Moki F,Kusano M,Mizuide M,Shimoyama Y,Kawamura O,Takagi H,Imai T,Mori M,Association between reflux oesophagitis and features of the metabolic syndrome in JapanAliment Pharmacol TherYear: 2007261069107510.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03454.x17877514
Wang X,Pitchumoni CS,Chandrarana K,Shah N,Increased prevalence of symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux diseases in type 2 diabetics with neuropathyWorld J GastroenterolYear: 20081470971210.3748/wjg.14.70918205259
Voutilainen M,Sipponen P,Mecklin JP,Juhola M,Farkkila M,Gastroesophageal reflux disease: prevalence, clinical, endoscopic and histopathological findings in 1,128 consecutive patients referred for endoscopy due to dyspeptic and reflux symptomsDigestionYear: 20006161310.1159/00000773010671769
He J,Ma X,Zhao Y,Wang R,Yan X,Yan H,Yin P,Kang X,Fang J,Hao Y,et al. A population-based survey of the epidemiology of symptom-defined gastroesophageal reflux disease: the systematic investigation of gastrointestinal diseases in ChinaBMC GastroenterolYear: 2010109410.1186/1471-230X-10-9420707933
Wang X,Lu M,Qian J,Yang Y,Li S,Lu D,Yu S,Meng W,Ye W,Jin L,Rationales, design and recruitment of the Taizhou longitudinal studyBMC Public HealthYear: 2009922310.1186/1471-2458-9-22319589173
Chinese Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Study GroupThe value of reflux diagnostic questionnaires in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux diseaseChin J DigYear: 200323651654 in Chinese.
Shaw MJ,Talley NJ,Beebe TJ,Rockwood T,Carlsson R,Adlis S,Fendrick AM,Jones R,Dent J,Bytzer P,Initial validation of a diagnostic questionnaire for gastroesophageal reflux diseaseAm J GastroenterolYear: 200196525710.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03451.x11197287
Klauser AG,Schindlbeck NE,Muller-Lissner SA,Symptoms in gastro-oesophageal reflux diseaseLancetYear: 199033520520810.1016/0140-6736(90)90287-F1967675
Revicki DA,Wood M,Wiklund I,Crawley J,Reliability and validity of the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale in patients with gastroesophageal reflux diseaseQual Life ResYear: 1998775839481153
Zhou B,Predictive values of body mass index and waist circumference to risk factors of related diseases in Chinese adult populationZhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za ZhiYear: 20022351012015100
Mizyed I,Fass SS,Fass R,Review article: gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and psychological comorbidityAliment Pharmacol TherYear: 20092935135810.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03883.x19035971
Wang JH,Luo JY,Dong L,Gong J,Tong M,Epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a general population-based study in Xi'an of Northwest ChinaWorld J GastroenterolYear: 2004101647165115162542
Lee SD,Keum B,Chun HJ,Bak YT,Gastroesophageal reflux disease in type II diabetes mellitus with or without peripheral neuropathyJ Neurogastroenterol MotilYear: 20111727427810.5056/jnm.2011.17.3.27421860819
Song HJ,Shim KN,Yoon SJ,Kim SE,Oh HJ,Ryu KH,Ha CY,Yeom HJ,Song JH,Jung SA,et al. The prevalence and clinical characteristics of reflux esophagitis in koreans and its possible relation to metabolic syndromeJ Korean Med SciYear: 20092419720210.3346/jkms.2009.24.2.19719399258
Chung SJ,Kim D,Park MJ,Kim YS,Kim JS,Jung HC,Song IS,Metabolic syndrome and visceral obesity as risk factors for reflux oesophagitis: a cross-sectional case–control study of 7078 Koreans undergoing health check-upsGutYear: 2008571360136510.1136/gut.2007.14709018441006
Cholongitas E,Pipili C,Dasenaki M,Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and irritable bowel syndrome significantly associated with metabolic syndromeScand J GastroenterolYear: 2008431405140610.1080/0036552080230802918752148
Moro E,Gallina P,Pais M,Cazzolato G,Alessandrini P,Bittolo-Bon G,Hypertriglyceridemia is associated with increased insulin resistance in subjects with normal glucose tolerance: evaluation in a large cohort of subjects assessed with the 1999 World Health Organization criteria for the classification of diabetesMetabolismYear: 20035261661910.1053/meta.2003.5010212759893
Tsukada K,Katoh H,Miyazaki T,Fukuchi M,Kuwano H,Kimura H,Fukai Y,Inose T,Motojima T,Toda N,et al. Factors associated with the development of reflux esophagitis after helicobacter pylori eradicationDig Dis SciYear: 20065153954210.1007/s10620-006-3167-216614964
Laurila A,Bloigu A,Nayha S,Hassi J,Leinonen M,Saikku P,Association of helicobacter pylori infection with elevated serum lipidsAtherosclerosisYear: 199914220721010.1016/S0021-9150(98)00194-49920523
Hongo M,Traube M,McAllister RG Jr,McCallum RW,Effects of nifedipine on esophageal motor function in humans: correlation with plasma nifedipine concentrationGastroenterologyYear: 1984868126689676

[TableWrap ID: T1] Table 1 

Characteristics of the Taizhou Retiree Cohort

  Male (n=3097) Female (n=5734)
Age (years, mean±SD)
BMI (mean±SD)
Waist (cm, mean±SD)
WHR (mean±SD)
SBP (mmHg, mean±SD)
DBP (mmHg, mean±SD)
Education (%)
Primary school or lower
1283 (41.4)
3478 (60.7)
Primary high school
1045 (33.8)
1535 (26.8)
Secondary high school
551 (17.8)
663 (11.6)
College and above
217 (7.0)
55 (0.9)
Occupation (%)
Blue collar
2463 (79.6)
5380 (93.9)
White collar
632 (20.4)
345 (6.1)
Smoking (%)
598 (19.3)
36 (0.6)
Current smokers
1475 (47.7)
293 (5.1)
1019 (33.0)
5403 (94.3)
Alcohol drinking (%)
1208 (39.0)
97 (1.7)
1889 (61.0)
5637 (98.3)
Tea drinking (%)
1570 (50.7)
537 (9.4)
1526 (49.3)
5159 (90.6)
Frequency of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms
2820 (91.1)
5081 (88.6)
Less than once per month
156 (5.0)
343 (6.0)
Once per month
71 (2.3)
210 (3.7)
Once per week
22 (0.7)
50 (0.9)
Several times per week
15 (0.5)
40 (0.7)
Daily 13 (0.4) 10 (0.2)

BMI: body mass index (weight[kg]/height2[m]); WHR: waist-to-hip ratio; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure.

[TableWrap ID: T2] Table 2 

Severity, use of medication, and frequency of symptoms among subjects with at least once per week gastroesophageal reflux episode

Frequency of the gastroesophageal reflux symptoms
Total (%)
  Once per week (%) Several times per week (%) Daily (%)  
Negligible or Mild
65 (90.2)
49 (89.1)
16 (69.6)
130 (86.7)
2 (2.8)
1 (1.8)
2 (8.7)
5 (3.3)
2 (2.8)
1 (1.8)
1 (4.3)
4 (2.7)
Very severe
3 (4.2)
4 (7.3)
4 (17.4)
11 (7.3)
Medication use
50 (69.4)
36 (65.4)
10 (43.5)
96 (64.0)
17 (23.6)
14 (25.5)
9 (39.1)
40 (26.7)
4 (5.6)
4 (7.3)
4 (17.4)
12 (8.0)
Other anti-acid medication 1 (1.4) 1 (1.8) 0 (0.0) 2 (1.3)

H2Ra: H2-receptor antagonist; PPI: proton pump inhibitors.

aMild: almost can be ignored; Moderate: cannot be ignored but can be tolerated; Severe: affects normal daily life; Very severe: markedly, affects normal daily life.

[TableWrap ID: T3] Table 3 

Obesity related factors and risk of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux

Variables Cases Controls Unadjusted OR 95% CI Adjusted ORa 95% CI
BMI (kg/m2)
Waistb (cm)
High 44 1985 1.2 (0.9-1.8) 1.1 (0.8-1.6)

BMI: body mass index (weight[kg]/height2[m]); WHR: wasit-to-hip ratio; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

aIn the multivariate logistic regression model adjustments were made for age, sex, education, occupation, tobacco smoking, alcohol drinking, tea drinking, history of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, gastritis or peptic ulcer, and serum TG.

bLow: Male<92cm and female<88cm; High: Male≥92cm and female≥88cm.

cLow: Male<0.95 and female<0.89; High: Male≥0.95 and female≥0.89.

[TableWrap ID: T4] Table 4 

Lifestyle related factors and risk of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux

Variables Cases Controls Unadjusted OR 95% CI Adjusted ORa 95% CI
Current smokers
Alcohol drinking
Tea drinking
Yes 30 1914 0.8 (0.5-1.2) 0.8 (0.5-1.3)

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

aORs were mutually adjusted for variables listed in the table, as well as age, sex, waist-to-hip ratio, history of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, gastritis, or peptic ulcer, and serum TG.

[TableWrap ID: T5] Table 5 

Past history of diseases and risk of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux

Variables Cases Controls Unadjusted OR 95% CI Adjusted ORa 95% CI
Diabetes Mellitus
Peptic ulcer
Serum TG
≥1.81mmol/L 19 523 2.0 (1.3-3.3) 2.0 (1.2-3.4)

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

aORs were mutually adjusted for variables listed in the table, as well as age, sex, waist-to-hip ratio, tobacco smoking, alcohol drinking, and tea drinking.

Article Categories:
  • Research Article

Keywords: Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, Body mass index, Obesity, Abdominal obesity, Retired population.

Previous Document:  Nitrogen origins and the role of ozonation in the formation of haloacetonitriles and halonitromethan...
Next Document:  RNA-seq and microarray complement each other in transcriptome profiling.