Document Detail

Prevalence of impacted and transmigrated canine teeth in a Cypriote orthodontic population in the Northern Cyprus area.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  24906489     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was two-fold; (1) to evaluate the prevalence and patterns of impacted canines and transmigrated canine teeth, and (2) to evaluate the possible relationships between impacted teeth, malocclusions and systemic conditions in an orthodontic patient population.
METHODS: The clinical records and panoramic radiographs of 453 patients [201 (44.3%) male and 252 (55.7%) female] referred to our outpatient clinic between January 2007 and January 2012 were retrospectively evaluated. The number, position, localization (right/left) and transmigration of teeth, as well as sex, age and systemic conditions of patients, were noted. An impacted canine was considered to be transmigrated when at least part of its length had crossed the midline. Complications related to impacted teeth (pain, cystic changes, root resorption or eruption disturbance of adjacent teeth) were also noted. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Impacted and transmigrated canine teeth were found in 16 (3.53%) and two (0.44%) patients in the study group, respectively. Root resorption was seen in four teeth adjacent to impacted canines. No statistical difference was found among gender, location, malocclusion and impaction of the teeth (p > 0.05). However, maxillary canine impaction occurred significantly more frequently than mandibular canine impaction (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The early detection of impacted as well as transmigrated teeth is crucial for successful treatment, therefore demographic studies are important. Although larger samples are required, this study provides a baseline regarding the frequency and type of impacted canines in this particular population.
Authors:
Beste Kamiloglu; Umay Kelahmet
Related Documents :
1426349 - Penetration of zona-free hamster oocytes using human sperm aspirated from the epididymi...
24640069 - Maxillary canine substitution for the severely resorbed root of central incisor: 12-yea...
15939419 - Evaluation of the effect of implanted depleted uranium on male reproductive success, sp...
3235029 - Egg-penetration ability and structural properties of human sperm prepared by percoll-gr...
3002719 - Orf 13904, a new long-acting vaginal contraceptive.
24046989 - Bond strength to unground enamel and sealing ability in pits and fissures of a new self...
16233409 - Optimization of aeration and agitation rates to improve cellulase-free xylanase product...
1791549 - A two-stage impression technique for the indirect fabrication of multiple cast dowel an...
14971259 - Localized ridge augmentation/preservation. a systematic review.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2014-6-7
Journal Detail:
Title:  BMC research notes     Volume:  7     ISSN:  1756-0500     ISO Abbreviation:  BMC Res Notes     Publication Date:  2014 Jun 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2014-6-7     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101462768     Medline TA:  BMC Res Notes     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  346     Citation Subset:  -    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): BMC Res Notes
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): BMC Res Notes
ISSN: 1756-0500
Publisher: BioMed Central
Article Information
Download PDF
Copyright © 2014 Kamiloglu and Kelahmet; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
open-access:
Received Day: 30 Month: 12 Year: 2013
Accepted Day: 29 Month: 5 Year: 2014
collection publication date: Year: 2014
Electronic publication date: Day: 7 Month: 6 Year: 2014
Volume: 7First Page: 346 Last Page: 346
PubMed Id: 24906489
ID: 4057553
Publisher Id: 1756-0500-7-346
DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-346

Prevalence of impacted and transmigrated canine teeth in a Cypriote orthodontic population in the Northern Cyprus area
Beste Kamiloglu1 Email: 59beste@gmail.com
Umay Kelahmet2 Email: dtumaykelahmet@gmail.com
1Consultant Orthodontist DDS PhD, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Near East University, Mersin 10, Turkey
2Research Assistant DDS, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Near East University, Mersin 10, Turkey

Background

Dental anomalies involving alterations in number, size and structure of teeth often present a major challenge for dental practitioners [1]. Undiagnosed and untreated, many of these dental anomalies may ultimately present complex treatment challenges in the areas of endodontics, orthodontics, prosthodontics and restorative dentistry [1]. From a therapeutic point of view, through early recognition of dental anomalies, many complications can be avoided [2,3]. Baccetti [4] reviewed the literature published before 1963, and reported that there is a possibility that tooth number polymorphism in man is not an isolated phenomenon, but bears a fundamental relationship to the size, development and calcification timing of the dentition as a whole. The spectrum of possible associations among tooth anomalies includes multiple missing teeth, impacted teeth, aplasia of upper lateral incisors and intraosseous displacement of maxillary canines [4].

Tooth impaction is a common dental condition frequently reported in the literature [5-8]. It was stated that when a tooth is unerupted more than 1 year after the normal age for eruption, it is then defined as “impacted” [9]. The prevalence of impacted teeth varies according to the population, and is reported to be between 6.9 and 76.6% [5-10]. The most commonly impacted teeth were reported as third molars, maxillary canines, maxillary central incisors and premolars. These variable rates may have occurred using different age groups, sample sizes and selection of patients [11-14].

Canine impaction is relatively common and has been reported extensively in different populations in the literature, ranging from 0.8 − 3.6% of the general population [15-19]. Transmigration, which is defined as migration of an impacted tooth across the midline, is a rarer condition than standard impaction cases [20]. The prevalence of transmigration in different populations and ethnic groups was the subject of several studies, and was reported to be between 0.1 and 0.34% [19,21]. Accordingly, genetic alterations and ethnic differences were reported to be the key factors for the occurrence of dental alterations [22]. Traits that may occur more commonly in certain ethnic groups may be considered to be specific to that population [3].

Although most impacted teeth are asymptomatic, some can cause complications such as pain, infection cysts, tumors, resorption of the adjacent teeth, jaw fractures, malpositioning of the mandibular anterior teeth and marginal bone resorption near the adjacent teeth [5,23].

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and patterns of impacted canines and transmigrated canine teeth and investigate the associated pathologies and evaluate possible relationships between impacted teeth, malocclusions and systemic conditions in an orthodontic patient population.


Methods

This was a population-based, retrospective, descriptive study based on the panoramic radiographs and clinical records of 453 patients [201 (44.3%) male and 252 (55.7%) female] ranging in age from 14 to 20 years, who attended our outpatient orthodontic clinic for evaluation of malocclusions from January 2008 to January 2012. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. Also, prior to taking any radiographs or performing intra/extra-oral examination, patients gave their informed consent according to the principles of the Helsinki Declaration, including all amendments and revisions. Collected data were only accessible to the researchers. Moreover, all examiners in the study only examined the radiographs and were blinded to any other patient data in the radiographic examination procedure.

The included sample consisted of 453 panoramic radiographs together with the subjects’ patient records. Digital panoramic radiographs were taken with a Planmeca PM 2002 cc Proline (Helsinki, Finland) set at 1.25 magnification as recommended by the manufacturer, with a maximum sensor resolution of 9 line pairs/mm. All radiographs were acquired with a standardized head position, stabilized by head rods. The exposure settings were dependent on the patient, set from 60–66 kVp, 4–8 mA for 18 s for each exposure, with a half-value layer of 2.47 mm of aluminum. All digital images were stored in a computer database using the manufacturer’s software (Dimaxis Pro, version 4.0.5, Planmeca). Each image was magnified to 110% and contrast and brightness were optimized to produce the best image for viewing under standardized conditions. All reviewing processes were performed on a 17-inch flat panel color active matrix TFT medical display (Samsung SyncMaster 920 N, South Korea) with a resolution of 1280 × 1024.

It has been suggested that the following clinical signs might be indicative of canine impaction [24,25]:

1. Delayed eruption of the permanent canine or prolonged retention of the deciduous canine beyond 14–15 years of age,

2. Absence of a normal labial canine bulge,

3. Presence of a palatal bulge, and

4. Delayed eruption, distal tipping or migration (splaying) of the lateral incisor.

An impacted canine was considered transmigrated when at least part of its length had crossed the midline [17,21]. The numbers, positions and locations (right/left) of impacted/transmigrated canine teeth, as well as patient sex, age, retained deciduous canines and any other associated pathologies, were noted after retrospective evaluation of the patients’ general histories, clinical and radiographic records.

The position of maxillary and mandibular impacted canine teeth were classified according to Mupparapu's classification [26] as:

1. Type 1: Canine positioned mesio-angularly across the midline within the jaw bone, labial or lingual to anterior teeth, and the crown portion of the tooth crossing the midline.

2. Type 2: Canine horizontally impacted near the inferior border of the mandible below the apices of the incisors.

3. Type 3: Canine erupting either mesial or distal to the opposite canine.

4. Type 4: Canine horizontally impacted near the inferior border of the mandible below the apices of either premolars or molars on the opposite side.

5. Type 5: Canine positioned vertically in the midline (the long axis of the tooth crossing the midline) irrespective of eruption status.

Two orthodontic consultants evaluated the images independently prior to the investigation. Calibration of the examiners was undertaken until intra-examiner reliability and reproducibility was achieved. Kappa statistics was used for assessing the agreement between observers using the NCSS 2007 statistical software (NCSS and GESS, NCSS, LLC, Kaysville, UT, USA). Inter-examiner discrepancies were solved by consensus and agreement [27]. To assess reliability, all radiographs were re-examined 2 months after the initial examination by these two observers for the reliability of the results. Pearson’s chi-squared test, Fisher’s exact test and Student’s t-test were performed for statistical analysis of differences in age, gender, localization and measurements (p < 0.05).


Results

Repeated evaluations showed no significant inter- and intra-observer difference (p > 0.05). There were no discordances in detecting the impacted and transmigrated canines between the two reviews. The kappa values for intra-observer as well as inter-observer detection of impacted and transmigrated canine were 1.0. All observers identified the same number and cases of canine impaction and transmigration in this study.

The distributions of impacted and transmigrated canines according to location and gender are shown in Table 1. Sixteen out of 453 (3.53%) patients had impacted canines (with a total of 18 teeth affected). Of all patients, seven (43.75%) were male and nine (56.25%) were female. Impacted canines were in the maxilla in 12 (75%) patients, while four (25%) patients showed mandibular canine impaction. In terms of impacted canine teeth according to gender, males had 1.99% in the mandible and 6.96% in the maxilla (p < 0.05), while the females’ corresponding values were 1.01% and 3.52% (p < 0.05).

There were five right and seven left impacted maxillary canines, while there were two right and two left mandibular impacted canine teeth. Of all patients, two impacted canines were bilateral (Figure 1), whereas 14 were unilaterally impacted teeth (Figure 2). No significant difference was found according to gender for impacted canine teeth (p > 0.05) (Table 2).

For all impacted canines, Type 1 position was the most common. There were no statically significant differences according to gender (p > 0.05). However, we found significant differences for location (p > 0.05), with maxillary canine impaction significantly more frequent than mandibular canine impaction (Table 3).

In all patients, only two (0.44%) transmigrated maxillary canine teeth were found (Figure 3) (Types 1 and 2). No statistically significant difference was found according to gender (p > 0.05). However, these two transmigrated teeth were impacted in the maxilla (Table 3). Associated pathologies were also investigated in this study. Root resorption was seen in four teeth adjacent to impacted canines, all located in the maxilla.


Discussion

Knowledge of dental anomalies in patients is fundamental for treatment planning [28]. Different prevalence was reported among different ethnic groups [2]. Ethnic background of the sample may result in higher or lower rates of some anomalies [4]. Traits that may occur more commonly in certain ethnic groups may be considered specific to that population [3]. According to Stecker et al. [1], dental practitioners who are aware of ethnic differences in the occurrence of dental anomalies will be more aware in finding them in patients during routine examinations, and may be predictive of normal patterns of tooth development and/or eruption, allowing for prompt clinical intervention to avoid complicating pathology.

Canine impaction is one of the anomalies that should be considered by clinicians in detail. There are various studies in the literature related to impacted and transmigrated teeth [17,18,20,29-37], but only a few comprehensive studies are available. As found in previous reports, canine impaction is more prevalent in the maxilla than the mandible. According to the literature, the prevalence of maxillary canine impaction ranges between 0.8 and 2.8% among different populations. Mandibular canine impaction is relatively rare [16,17,21,38].

Chu et al. [5] investigated the prevalence of impacted teeth and their orientations, but did not mention canine transmigration. Aktan et al. [21] reported canine transmigration together with other impacted teeth, but did not include their orientation. Meanwhile, in their report they excluded third molars similarly to Fardi et al. [38]. As found previously, in this study canine impaction was more prevalent in the maxilla than in the mandible (30 teeth in the maxilla versus seven teeth in the mandible).

In this study, transmigration was also evaluated and a prevalence of 0.44% (2/453) was found. Previous studies indicated a prevalence varying between 0.1 and 4.51%. Shah et al. [10] found eight (0.1%) transmigrated mandibular canines and 4.06% maxillary canine impaction in 7886 individuals. Aktan et al. [21] found a prevalence of 0.34% for transmigrated mandibular canines and 0.14% for maxillary transmigrated canines, while a recent study [37] found a 0.1% prevalence of transmigrated canines in 12,000 patients. However, studies like Zvolanek’s [39] failed to find any cases in 4000 individuals. Our results were in line with previous studies.

Since almost all canine transmigrations are asymptomatic, they are usually diagnosed in routine radiographic assessments [17,20,26,31]. A small number of patients complain of pain, infection, swelling or cyst formation resulting from impacted and transmigrated canines. In this study, root resorption was seen in four teeth adjacent to impacted canines, all located in the maxilla. Bacetti [4] concluded in his review that the existence of associations between different dental anomalies is clinically relevant, as the early diagnosis of one anomaly may indicate an increased risk for others, and reported that the future analysis of a broader spectrum of dental and eruption anomalies in man may reveal further or different patterns or associations. In another study, Sørensen et al. [40] analyzed radiographic evidence of dental deviations with palatally or labially located ectopic canines. Authors of that study recommended that special attention should be given to dental deviations such as invaginations, crown and root deviations including taurodontic molar roots and agenesis as possible risk factors associated with ectopic eruption of maxillary canines, so early identification of patients at risk and appropriate interceptive treatment may reduce ectopic eruption of maxillary canines.

Still, this study has limitations as the sample size was small and the sample population was only representative of the patient pool at the Faculty of Dentistry. Wider population groups should be studied in Cyprus. However, some authors still believe that the prevalence rates of canine impaction may reflect the prevalence rates of these anomalies in the general population.


Conclusions

The information given in this study could be added to information obtained from other studies on unerupted impacted and transmigrated canine teeth so that a useful clinical database on this particular population could be created to constitute proper plans for managing impacted canines.


Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


Authors’ contributions

BK and UK participated in the retrospective evaluation of the data. BK prepared the manuscript. BK and UK are responsible for the literature search and wrote the paper. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.


Acknowledgments

We thank the Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology Department for providing us with the retrospective data and radiographs of the study sample.


References
Stecker SS,Beiraghi S,Hodges JS,Peterson VS,Myers SL,Prevalence of dental anomalies in a Southeast Asian population in the Minneapolis/Saint Paul metropolitan areaNorthwest DentYear: 20077252817987833
Ezoddini AF,Sheikhha MH,Ahmadi H,Prevalence of dental developmental anomalies: a radiographic studyCommunity Dent HealthYear: 2007714014417958073
King NM,Tongkoom S,Itthagarun A,Wong HM,Lee CK,A catalogue of anomalies and traits of the primary dentition of southern ChineseJ Clin Pediatr DentYear: 2008713914618389680
Baccetti T,A controlled study of associated dental anomaliesAngle OrthodYear: 199872672749622764
Chu FCS,Li TKL,Lui VKB,Newsome PRH,Chow RLK,Cheung LK,Prevalence of impacted teeth and associated pathologies-a radiographic study of the Hong Kong Chinese populationHong Kong Med JYear: 2003715816312777649
Hattab FN,Rawashdeh MA,Fahmy MS,Impaction status of third molars in Jordanian studentsOral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol EndodYear: 19957242910.1016/S1079-2104(05)80068-X7614155
Peltola JS,A panoramatomographic study of the teeth and jaws of Finnish university studentsCommunity Dent Oral EpidemiolYear: 19937363910.1111/j.1600-0528.1993.tb00716.x8432103
Yamaoka M,Furusawa K,Yamamoto M,Influence of adjacent teeth on impacted third molars in the upper and lower jawsAust Dent JYear: 1995723323510.1111/j.1834-7819.1995.tb04801.x7575277
Torres-Lagares D,Flores-Ruiz R,Infante-Cossio P,Garcia Calderon M,Gutierres Perez JL,Transmigration of impacted lower canine. Case report and review of the literatureMedicina Oral Patologia Oral Cirugia BucalYear: 20067171174
Shah RM,Boyd MA,Vakil TF,Studies of permanent tooth anomalies in 7886 Canadian individuals. I: impacted teethDent JYear: 19787262264277399
Murray P,Brown NL,The conservative approach to managing unerupted lower premolars two case reportsInt J Paediatr DentYear: 2003719820310.1046/j.1365-263X.2003.00447.x12752920
Lee PP,Impacted premolarsDent UpdateYear: 2005715215415881510
Karapanou V,Endodontic management of an impacted premolarJ Clin Pediatr DentYear: 2005729329816161393
McNamara C,McNamara TG,Mandibular premolar impaction:2 case reportsJ Can Dent AssocYear: 2005785986316480602
Grover PS,Lorton L,The incidence of unerupted permanenet teeth and related clinical casesOral Surg Oral Med Oral PatholYear: 1985742042510.1016/0030-4220(85)90070-23858781
Aras MH,Büyükkurt MC,Yolcu U,Ertas U,Dayi E,Transmigrant maxillary caninesOral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol EndodYear: 20087e485218280946
Aydin U,Yilmaz H,Yildirim D,Incidence of canine impaction and transmigration in a patient populationDentomaxillofac RadiolYear: 2004716416910.1259/dmfr/1547065815371316
Mazinis E,Zafeiriadis A,Karathanasis A,Lambrianidis T,Transmigration of impacted canines: prevalence, management and implications on tooth structure and pulp vitality of adjacent teethClin Oral InvestigYear: 2012762563210.1007/s00784-011-0545-821448635
Javid B,Transmigration of impacted mandibular cuspidsInt J Oral SurgYear: 1985754754910.1016/S0300-9785(85)80063-63936805
González-Sánchez MA,Berini-Aytés L,Gay-Escoda C,Transmigrant impacted mandibular canines: a retrospective study of 15 casesJ Am Dent AssocYear: 200771450145510.14219/jada.archive.2007.008017974641
Aktan AM,Kara S,Akgünlü F,Malkoç S,The incidence of canine transmigration and tooth impaction in a Turkish subpopulationEur J OrthodYear: 2010757558110.1093/ejo/cjp15120237077
Pedreira EN,Magalhães MC,Cardoso CL,Taveira LA,de Freitas CF,Radiographic study of dental anomalies in Brazilian patients with neuropsychomotor disordersJ Appl Oral SciYear: 2007752452819089192
Peterson LJ,Peterson LJ, Ellis EIII, Hupp JR, Tucker MRPrinciples of management of impacted teethContemporary oral and maxillofacial surgeryYear: 1988St Louis: CV Mosby223256
Bishara SE,Impacted maxillary canines: a reviewAm J Orthod Dentofacial OrthopYear: 199271597110.1016/0889-5406(92)70008-X1739070
Manne R,Gandikota C,Juvvadi SR,Rama HR,Anche S,Impacted canines: etiology, diagnosis, and orthodontic managementJ Pharm Bioallied SciYear: 20127S234810.4103/0975-7406.10021623066259
Mupparapu M,Patterns of intra-osseous transmigration and ectopic eruption of mandibular canines: review of literature and report of nine additional casesDentomaxillofac RadiolYear: 2002735536010.1038/sj.dmfr.460073212424633
Celikoglu M,Kamak H,Oktay H,Prevalence and characteristics of supernumerary teeth in a non-syndrome Turkish population: associated pathologies and proposed treatmentMed Oral Patol Oral Cir BucalYear: 20107e57557820173719
Aljamal G,Hazza'a A,Rawashdeh M,Prevalence of dental anomalies in a population of cleft lip and palate patientsCleft Palate Craniofac JYear: 2010741342010.1597/08-275.120590463
Tseng YC,Chang HP,Chou TM,Canine transpositionKaohsiung J Med SciYear: 2005744144710.1016/S1607-551X(09)70148-216302446
Shapira Y,Kuftinec MM,Intrabony migration of impacted teethAngle OrthodYear: 2003773874314719741
Buyukkurt MC,Aras MH,Caglaroglu M,Gungormus M,Transmigrant mandibular caninesJ Oral Maxillofac SurgYear: 200772025202910.1016/j.joms.2006.02.03317884533
Joshi MR,Transmigrant mandibular canines: a record of 28 cases and a retrospective review of the literatureAngle OrthodYear: 20017122211211293
Celikoglu M,Kamak H,Oktay H,Investigation of transmigrated and impacted maxillary and mandibular canine teeth in an orthodontic patient populationJ Oral Maxillofac SurgYear: 201071001100610.1016/j.joms.2009.09.00620188449
Sumer P,Sumer M,Ozden B,Otan F,Transmigration of mandibular canines: a report of six cases and a review of the literatureJ Contemp Dent PractYear: 2007710411017351688
Camilleri S,Scerri E,Transmigration of mandibular canines–a review of the literature and a report of five casesAngle OrthodYear: 2003775376214719743
Shapira Y,Kuftinec MM,Unusual intraosseous transmigration of a palatally impacted canineAm J Orthod Dentofacial OrthopYear: 2005736036310.1016/j.ajodo.2004.04.01815775953
Gündüz K,Çelenk P,The incidence of impacted transmigrant canines: a retrospective studyOral RadiolYear: 20107778110.1007/s11282-010-0044-7
Fardi A,Kondylidou-Sidira A,Bachour Z,Parisis N,Tsirlis A,Incidence of impacted and supernumerary teeth-a radiographic study in a North Greek populationMed Oral Patol Oral Cir BucalYear: 20117e566120711166
Zvolanek JW,Transmigration of an impacted mandibular canineIllinois Dental JournalYear: 1986786873462121
Sørensen HB,Artmann L,Larsen HJ,Kjaer I,Radiographic assessment of dental anomalies in patients with ectopic maxillary caninesInt J Paediatr DentYear: 2009710811410.1111/j.1365-263X.2008.00948.x19178604

Figures

[Figure ID: F1]
Figure 1 

Panoramic image showing bilateral impacted canine in a female patient.



[Figure ID: F2]
Figure 2 

Panoramic image showing unilateral impacted canine in maxilla of a male patient.



[Figure ID: F3]
Figure 3 

Panoramic images showing transmigrated canine teeth in maxilla.



Tables
[TableWrap ID: T1] Table 1 

The distribution of canine impaction and transmigration according to location and gender


Impaction Patients % in sub-groups P value Males (n) P value Females (n) P-value
Canine Impaction
16/453
8.16
 
7
 
9
 
Maxillary Canine
12/453
75
<0.05
4
>0.05
6
>0.05
Mandibular Canine
4/453
25
3
3
Canine Transmigration
2/453
0.44
 
1
 
1
 
Maxillary Transmigration
2/2
100
>0.05 1
>0.05 1
>0.05
Mandibular Transmigration 0/2 0 0 0

P value less than 0.05 indicates significance.


[TableWrap ID: T2] Table 2 

The distribution of number and genders of patients associated with canine impaction


Gender
Number of impacted canines
P-value
  Unilateral n (%) Bilateral n (%) Total n (%)
Female
8 (88.8)
1 (11.9)
9 (100.0)
>0.05
Male
6 (88.8)
1 (11.9)
7 (100.0)
 
Total 14 (87.5) 52 (12.5) 16 (100.0)  

P value less than 0.05 indicates significance.


[TableWrap ID: T3] Table 3 

The classification of impacted and transmigrated canine teeth in the maxilla and mandible


  Mandible
Maxilla
Impacted canine Transmigration Impacted canine Transmigration
Position
n (M/F)
n (M/F)
n (M/F)
n (M/F)
None
200 / 251

193 / 248

Type 1
1 / 0

3 / 2
1 / 0
Type 2
0 / 1

3/ 1
0 / 1
Type 3


1 / 0

Type 4


0 / 1

Type 5


1 / 0

Total 201 / 252 201 / 252 1 / 1


Article Categories:
  • Research Article

Keywords: Impacted teeth, Radiographic evaluation, Transmigration, Premolars, Canine, Retrospective evaluation.

Previous Document:  Periodic Estrogen Receptor-Beta Activation: A Novel Approach to Prevent Ischemic Brain Damage.
Next Document:  The exposome: a new paradigm to study the impact of environment on health.