Document Detail


Pressure phosphene tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for measuring intraocular pressure before and after LASIK.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  17455836     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: To compare pressure phosphene tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry for measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) before and after LASIK. METHODS: Forty-three (18 men and 25 women) consecutive healthy patients underwent complete pre- and postoperative LASIK ophthalmologic assessments including manifest and cycloplegic refraction, keratometry, and central corneal thickness. Three repetitive sets of pressure phosphene tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry measurements were performed the day before and 3 months following uneventful LASIK. RESULTS: Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -4.70 +/- 2.50 diopters (D) (range: -1.50 to -12.90 D) and mean preoperative keratometry was 43.95 +/- 1.08 D. After LASIK, spherical equivalent refraction was +0.23 +/- 0.11 D and mean keratometry was 39.46 +/- 2.28 D. Preoperative pressure phosphene tonometry (12.16 +/- 1.58 mmHg) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (12.01 +/- 1.55 mmHg) IOP measurements were similar. Postoperative IOP was 10.30 +/- 1.16 mmHg with Goldmann applanation tonometry and 12.20 +/- 1.62 mmHg with pressure phosphene tonometry. The postoperative IOP difference between Goldmann applanation tonometry and pressure phosphene tonometry was 0.15 +/- 1.12 mmHg (P = .41). The mean change in pachymetry after LASIK was 68.73 +/- 73 microm. The change in Goldmann applanation between preoperative and postoperative LASIK values was 1.71 +/- 1.43 mmHg (P < .0001), a change that was strongly correlated with changes in corneal thickness (R = 0.75, P < .0001) and keratometry (R = 0.72, P < .0001). No such correlations were found with pressure phosphene tonometry. CONCLUSIONS: Goldmann applanation tonometry-measured IOP decrease after LASIK is strongly correlated with a decrease in central corneal thickness and changes in keratometry, whereas pressure phosphene tonometry-measured IOP is independent of corneal thickness. Pressure phosphene tonometry appears to be a more reliable method for recording tonometry in these patients.
Authors:
Gabi Shemesh; Oran Man; Adi Michaeli; David Varssano; Moshe Lazar
Related Documents :
17478126 - Hydrolysis and transesterification reactions of candesartan cilexetil observed during t...
3759226 - Response of cerebral arteries to sympathetic stimulation during acute hypertension.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)     Volume:  23     ISSN:  1081-597X     ISO Abbreviation:  J Refract Surg     Publication Date:  2007 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2007-04-25     Completed Date:  2007-06-12     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9505927     Medline TA:  J Refract Surg     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  405-9     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel. gabi1961@netvision.net.il
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Female
Humans
Intraocular Pressure*
Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ*
Male
Middle Aged
Phosphenes*
Postoperative Period*
Preoperative Care*
Tonometry, Ocular / methods*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Calculating intraocular lens geometry by real ray tracing.
Next Document:  Prospective evaluation of PermaVision intracorneal implants using in vivo confocal microscopy.