Document Detail

Preparation of the Dräger Fabius anesthesia machine for the malignant-hyperthermia susceptible patient.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19020141     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
BACKGROUND: Anesthesia machines must be flushed of halogenated anesthetics before use in patients susceptible to malignant hyperthermia. We studied the kinetics of sevoflurane clearance in the Dräger Fabius anesthesia machine and compared them to a conventional anesthesia machine (Dräger Narkomed GS). METHODS: Before each trial, the anesthesia machine was contaminated for 2 h with 3% sevoflurane and then prepared by changing the CO(2) absorbent, removing the vaporizer(s), and mounting a clean circuit and artificial lung. The basic flush procedure consisted of oxygen 10 L/min with the ventilator set to a tidal volume of 600 mL at a rate of 10/min. Residual sevoflurane in the inspiratory limb of the circuit was measured using an ambient air analyzer capable of measuring sevoflurane to < 1 ppm. Results were analyzed using log-linear regression of residual concentration as a function of time. This model was used to estimate the time required to achieve a desired residual anesthetic concentration. RESULTS: Times to achieve 10 and 5 ppm in the Dräger Narkomed GS were 11 and 18 min, respectively. For the Dräger Fabius anesthesia machine, times to 10 and 5 ppm were 75 and 104 min, respectively. Several maneuvers to accelerate clearance of residual sevoflurane from the Dräger Fabius resulted in only modest reductions in these times (10 and 5 ppm times 40-50 min and 60-80 min, respectively). Insertion of an activated charcoal filter (QED, Anecare Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT) into the inspiratory limb of the Dräger Fabius circuit reduced the residual anesthetic concentration to <5 ppm within 10 min; this concentration was maintained for > 6 h despite a fresh gas flow of only 2 L/min after the first 15 min. DISCUSSION: Preparation of the Dräger Fabius anesthesia machine using conventional flushing techniques required almost 10 times as long as an older, conventional anesthesia machine. If a prolonged flush is impractical or impossible, we describe a procedure using an activated charcoal filter inserted on the inspiratory limb of the breathing circuit which can effectively scrub residual sevoflurane to a concentration < 5 ppm within 10 min. This procedure includes an initial 5 min flush without the activated charcoal filter followed by a 5 min flush with the charcoal filter, after which the machine is ready for use in the malignant hyperthermia-susceptible patient. The charcoal filter must remain on the machine for the remainder of the anesthetic, and the fresh gas flow should be maintained > or = 10 L/min for the first 5 min, and > or = 2 L/min thereafter.
Joel B Gunter; John Ball; Sean Than-Win
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Anesthesia and analgesia     Volume:  107     ISSN:  1526-7598     ISO Abbreviation:  Anesth. Analg.     Publication Date:  2008 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2008-11-21     Completed Date:  2008-12-30     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  1310650     Medline TA:  Anesth Analg     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1936-45     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Department of Anesthesia, Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave., Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Anesthesiology / instrumentation*
Anesthetics, Inhalation / pharmacokinetics*
Disease Susceptibility
Equipment Contamination
Malignant Hyperthermia / physiopathology*
Methyl Ethers / pharmacokinetics*
Ventilators, Mechanical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Anesthetics, Inhalation; 0/Methyl Ethers; 28523-86-6/sevoflurane

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Factors associated with unanticipated day of surgery deaths in Department of Veterans Affairs hospit...
Next Document:  Open abdominal surgery increases intraoperative oxidative stress: can it be prevented?