Document Detail


Preoperative nonresectability criteria used for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: a practical survey among gastroenterologists and surgeons. Société Française de Chirurgie Digestive.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  11075986     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Preoperative nonresectability criteria for carcinoma of the pancreatic head remain controversial. We sought to assess prospectively the preoperative criteria used currently in clinical practice and to determine the different therapeutic strategies used between gastroenterologists (GEs) and digestive surgeons (Ss). The evaluation comprised all of the registered GEs (n = 3,466) and Ss (n = 687) who were sent a questionnaire surveying nonresectability criteria. The hypothesis in question concerned adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head in a patient in the absence of general operative contraindication. Six hundred fifteen complete responses to the questionnaire were received (GEs, 426; Ss, 189). The mean estimated percentage of resected tumor was 22% (GEs, 19%; Ss, 31%; p < 0.0001). Preoperative nonresectability criteria differed between the two groups and included weight loss >25% (percentage of GEs using this criterion, 57%; Ss, 48%; p < 0.04), duodenal wall invasion (GEs, 30%; Ss, 4%; p < 0.001), gastric extension (GEs, 55%; Ss, 23%; p < 0.001), invasion of gastroduodenal artery (GEs, 58%; Ss, 19%; p < 0.001), invasion of superior mesenteric artery (GEs, 85%; Ss, 92%; p < 0.02), invasion of portal vein (GEs, 78%; Ss, 52%; p < 0.001), tumor diameter >6 cm (GEs, 52%; Ss, 38%; p < 0.001), peripancreatic lymph nodes (GEs, 33-69% depending on the node area; Ss, 5-52%; p < 0.02-0.001). Consensual criterion used by >85% of GEs and Ss was celiac trunk invasion. Criteria rejected by >85% both of GEs and Ss were back pain, weight loss <25%, and tumor diameter < or = 5 cm. Criteria without consensus (used or rejected by <85% of GEs and Ss) were superior mesenteric vein and hepatic artery invasion. The preoperative nonresectability criteria used in determining operative resectability differs significantly between medical and surgical gastroenterologists. This study is the first to quantify this difference. These results underline the need for consensus agreement in the criteria of resectability.
Authors:
P Lévy; M J Boudet; M Zins; B Gayet
Related Documents :
921656 - Joint committee on aviation pathology: xi. evaluation and disposition of army helicopte...
16708526 - Medical qualification of a commercial spaceflight participant: not your average astronaut.
19769646 - Professionalism mini-evaluation exercise for medical residents in japan: a pilot study.
23205506 - Medical management of sand enteropathy in 62 horses.
12481476 - From photography to cinematography: recording movement and gait in a neurological context.
11623566 - Saints, miracles and healings: eternal challenges.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Pancreas     Volume:  21     ISSN:  0885-3177     ISO Abbreviation:  Pancreas     Publication Date:  2000 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2001-02-15     Completed Date:  2001-02-15     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8608542     Medline TA:  Pancreas     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  333-7     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Département Médico-Chirurgical de Pathologie Digestive, IMM-Choisy, Paris, France. philippe.levy@bjn.ap-hop-paris.fr
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adenocarcinoma / pathology,  surgery*
Adult
Aged
Humans
Middle Aged
Pancreatic Neoplasms / pathology,  surgery*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Acute pancreatitis secondary to pancreatic carcinoma. Study Group Participants.
Next Document:  Racial differences in pancreatic cancer: comparison of survival and histologic types of pancreatic c...