Document Detail

Prenatal ultrasonography and Doppler sonography for the clinical investigation of isolated ventricular septal defects in a late second-trimester population.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  24456562     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of prenatal ultrasonography and Doppler sonography in detecting isolated ventricular septal defects (VSDs) in a late-second-trimester population.
METHODS: Fetal echocardiography, Doppler ultrasound, and biometry were used to evaluate 2,661 singleton fetuses (1,381 male fetuses and 1,280 female fetuses) between 1 August 2006 and 31 May 2010. The efficacy of each fetal biometry, Doppler ultrasound, and nasal bone length (NBL) measurement was evaluated in all of the fetuses. A standard fetal echocardiographic evaluation, including two-dimensional gray-scale imaging and color and Doppler color flow mapping, was performed on all fetuses.
RESULTS: We detected isolated VSDs in 124 of the 2,661 singleton fetuses between 19 and 24 weeks of gestation. The prevalence of isolated VSDs in the study population was 4.66%. A multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that short fetal NBL (odds ratio = 0.691, 95% confidence interval: 0.551 to 0.868) and the pulsatility index (PI) of the umbilical artery (odds ratio = 8.095, 95% confidence interval: 4.309 to 15.207) and of the middle cerebral artery (odds ratio = 0.254, 95% confidence interval: 0.120 to 0.538) are significantly associated with isolated VSDs.
CONCLUSION: Late-second-trimester fetal NBL, umbilical artery PI, and middle cerebral artery PI are useful parameters for detecting isolated VSDs, and can be used to estimate the a priori risk of VSDs in women at high risk and at low risk of isolated VSDs.
Authors:
Wei-Hsiu Chiu; Ming-Chon Hsiung; Ran-Chou Chen; Xiao-Min Xiao; Cai-Lin Wu; Tao-Hsin Tung
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2014-1-24
Journal Detail:
Title:  European journal of medical research     Volume:  19     ISSN:  2047-783X     ISO Abbreviation:  Eur. J. Med. Res.     Publication Date:  2014 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2014-1-24     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9517857     Medline TA:  Eur J Med Res     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  3     Citation Subset:  -    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Eur J Med Res
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Eur. J. Med. Res
ISSN: 0949-2321
ISSN: 2047-783X
Publisher: BioMed Central
Article Information
Download PDF
Copyright © 2014 Chiu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
open-access:
Received Day: 15 Month: 6 Year: 2013
Accepted Day: 8 Month: 1 Year: 2014
collection publication date: Year: 2014
Electronic publication date: Day: 24 Month: 1 Year: 2014
Volume: 19 Issue: 1
First Page: 3 Last Page: 3
PubMed Id: 24456562
ID: 3903045
Publisher Id: 2047-783X-19-3
DOI: 10.1186/2047-783X-19-3

Prenatal ultrasonography and Doppler sonography for the clinical investigation of isolated ventricular septal defects in a late second-trimester population
Wei-Hsiu Chiu123 Email: kyu103.kyu103@msa.hinet.net
Ming-Chon Hsiung4 Email: mhsiung007@yahoo.com
Ran-Chou Chen15 Email: DAA60@tpech.gov.tw
Xiao-Min Xiao2 Email: qu4781@gmail.com
Cai-Lin Wu6 Email: ana080501@gmail.com
Tao-Hsin Tung78 Email: ch2876@chgh.org.tw
1Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, School of Biomedical Science and Engineering, National Yang-Ming University, 112 Taipei, Taiwan
21st Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, 510632 Guangzhou, China
3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chung Shan Hospital, 106 Taipei, Taiwan
4Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Cheng-Hsin General Hospital, 112 Taipei, Taiwan
5Department of Radiology, Taipei City Hospital, 100 Taipei, Taiwan
6Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The 3rd Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
7Department of Medical Research and Education, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, No. 45, Cheng-Hsin Street, 112 Taipei, Taiwan
8Faculty of Public Health, School of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, 24205 New Taipei City, Taiwan

Background

Prenatal ultrasound screening is widely employed for detecting congenital malformations and structural heart defects. In previous studies, the prevalence of fetal congenital heart disease (CHD) ranged from 3/1,000 to 10/1,000 total live births. In the presence of CHD, ventricular septal defects (VSDs) are highly prevalent in newborns [1-3]. VSDs account for 30 to 35% of all CHD detected after birth. Previous studies have identified a VSD prevalence of 10 to 16% in fetal tests [1,4,5]. VSDs were also associated with other heart structural defects, such as right ventricular outflow tract and left ventricular outflow tract anomalies, as well as some aspects of Tetralogy of Fallot. Chromosomal anomalies associated with a VSD include trisomies 21, 13, and 18, deletion in 22q11, and nonchromosomal malformed fetuses [6,7].

The incidence of VSDs is the highest and second highest in live births and stillbirths, respectively [1]. VSDs are also the most common CHD diagnosis within the first year of life and the most frequently detected prenatal heart defect. VSDs represent one of the major sources of false-negative diagnoses in the uterus. Improvements in prenatal screening and VSD diagnosis can reduce neonatal mortality and morbidity [8,9]. B-mode fetal echocardiography as well as M-mode and color-mode echocardiography are the clinical screening methods used for VSDs [10-12]. Previous studies have proposed fetal Doppler echocardiography screening as an additional screening tool for VSDs [13-15]. Other studies indicated a high correlation between results obtained using fetal echocardiography and color Doppler echocardiography, reporting high sensitivity and specificity, and a low false-positive rate for CHD in fetal echocardiography examinations [16-19]. Conducting Doppler assessments of fetal arterial blood flow might increase the rate of identification of fetuses at risk of CHD. According to previous studies, CHD is associated with a significantly decreased pulsatility index (PI) in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) and an increased PI in the umbilical artery (UA) [20-22].

Fetal VSD assessment is a major component of a prenatal fetal heart examination, and is a useful primary diagnostic and screening tool for fetal CHD or chromosomal anomalies. In this study, we investigated fetal variations in VSDs using fetal arterial Doppler assessments to establish the risk of fetal VSDs in the general population.


Methods
Study participants

The study participants were 2,661 women with singleton pregnancies who underwent a fetal level II prenatal ultrasound examination, including detailed fetal echocardiography, in one teaching hospital and three obstetric clinics in Taipei, Taiwan between August 2006 and May 2010. As part of their prenatal care routine, all women underwent a prenatal ultrasound (including echocardiography) at 32 to 34 weeks of gestation. All procedures were performed in accordance with the guidelines of our institutional ethics committee and the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. All patient information was anonymous. Access to personal records was approved by the Hospital Human Subjects Review Board at Fu-Jen University, Taipei, Taiwan.

The gestational age (GA) of a fetus was determined according to the date of confinement estimated by the patient. If the estimated date of confinement was unknown, the difference between the ultrasonically estimated GA and the determined GA was assumed to be <10 days. For all fetuses with any associated abnormality, an antenatal diagnosis was arranged at a medical center within 1 to 2 weeks. The study exclusion criteria included a previous history of chromosome abnormalities, fetal structural anomalies or other CHD, and maternal complications.

Ultrasound equipment and intraobserver variability

All fetal examinations were performed using a Voluson730ProV ultrasound platform (General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA) with multifrequency transabdominal transducers. A single experienced registered sonographer collected all scans and fetal measurements. Reliability statistics were used to assess the agreement of intraobserver reliability among repeated fetal biometry measurements collected by the same examiner.

Measurement of fetal nasal bone and biometric examination

Fetal nasal bone length (NBL) was measured in a midsagittal view of the head using appropriate image magnification. To prevent measurement error, if the nasal bone was absent or shortened then the angle of the fetal nose was maintained at between 45° and 135°. Each increment was set at a 0.1 mm caliper distance, at the appropriate image magnification, to maintain accuracy [23].

The biparietal diameter (BPD) was measured on a transverse axial section of the fetal head, which included the midline falx and the thalami, symmetrically positioned on either side of the falx from the outer edge of the nearer parietal bone to the inner edge of the more distant parietal bone, and the septum pellucidum was visualized at one-third of the frontal–occipital distance [24].

The plane of the abdominal circumference (AC) was measured on a transverse section through the fetal abdomen. This plane was at the level of the liver and stomach bubble including the ductus venosus within the point of bifurcation of the main portal vein into its right and left branches in the anterior third of the fetal abdomen in the axial plane 90° to the fetal spine and posterior to the aorta. Measured from skin to skin, the transverse and anterior–posterior diameters were first measured as the long or short axis of an onscreen ellipse, and the circumference was obtained using elliptical calipers superimposed on the four points [24]. The single measurement plane of six limb bones (humerus, ulna, radius, femur, tibia, and fibula) was on the longest section of each structure. An appropriate magnification was used for the image to occupy three-quarters of the screen. The transducer was aligned to the long axis of the limb bone to obtain the appropriate plane of the section. The ossified portion of diaphysis was measured. The cartilaginous ends of the limb bones were excluded [25].

The estimated fetal body weight (FBW) was calculated using Hadlock’s formula [26]. This formula involves a summation of the BPD, AC, and femur length and provides a number in millimeters. The regression equation of the estimated FBW is:


Log10FBW=1.4787−0.003343AC×FL+0.001837BPD2+0.0458×AC+0.158×femurlength

Fetal heart assessment and Doppler measurement

The sonographers performed detailed fetal echocardiographic examinations of the 19-week to 24-week level II scans, under the direct supervision of an obstetrician. The detailed fetal heart assessment included basic screening and an extended cardiac scan [27,28]. The standard fetal echocardiographic evaluation involves employing all modalities of diagnostic ultrasound, including two-dimensional gray-scale imaging, and color and Doppler color flow mapping. The examination included the standard four-chamber view, the views of the left ventricular outflow tract and right ventricular outflow tract, the three-vessel view, and the basal short-axis two-dimensional B-mode echocardiography image.

Gray-scale imaging was initially performed, followed by color Doppler flow mapping (Figure 1). The high-pass filter was set at 100 Hz. The four-chamber view was observed using real-time scanning, and color Doppler was used to detect the presence of a VSD during the phase of a shunt between the right and left ventricles (Figure 2). The fetuses with VSDs that shunted flow were detected using two-dimensional color Doppler ultrasound examinations. The VSDs were recorded to ensure that the septum was perpendicular to the ultrasound beam, enabling the flow crossing the septum, indicating a septal defect, to be detected accurately [29]. For all fetuses with VSDs, a diagnostic antenatal echocardiographic examination was arranged at a medical center within 1 to 2 weeks. After delivery, the newborn babies with VSDs received a postnatal echocardiographic examination. In the non-VSD group, a prenatal ultrasound (including echocardiography) was performed at 32 to 34 weeks of gestation. A pediatrician examined the heart sound of all newborn babies.

An ultrasound examination for fetal biometry and a fetal heart assessment were conducted to exclude structural abnormalities. Liquor volume assessments, Doppler blood flow measurements of the UA, and Doppler blood flow velocity measurements of the MCA were also performed. All fetuses were subjected to Doppler examination of the MCA. An axial section of the brain, imaged in the BPD biometry plane, was obtained. The plane was then shifted downward toward the skull base. The circle of Willis was visualized and the MCA on one side was examined. The optimal site for recording a Doppler spectrum is the midpoint of the MCA, approximately 1 cm from the circle of Willis. The width of the sample volume was set between 2 and 4 mm. The wall filter was set as ≤120 Hz. Pulsed wave Doppler analysis was performed with the angle between the ultrasound beam and the direction of blood flow maintained as close to 0 to 25° as possible (Figure 3) [30,31]. The Doppler spectrum was sampled from a free loop of the umbilical cord with a wall filter setting >120 Hz (Figure 4) [30]. The PIs and resistance indices (RIs) of the UA and MCA Doppler waveform were measured.

In this study, the sensitivity of UA PIs >90% (1.47), MCA PIs <10% (1.23) and nasal bone length were 36.80%, 20.80% and 19.35%, respectively. The specificity of UA PIs >90% (1.47), MCA PIs <10% (1.23), and nasal bone length were 96.71%, 91.52%, and 93.46%, respectively.

Data analysis

A statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (Version 13.0 for Windows; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). P <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The mean, standard deviation, and percentiles of the GA, NBL, limb bone length, estimated FBW, cardiothoracic area ratio, cardiothoracic circumference ratio, PIs and RIs of the UA, and PIs and RIs of the MCA were determined. In addition, a logistic regression of a binary response variable (Y) on a continuous, normally distributed variable (X) with a sample size of 2,661 observations achieves 99% power at a 0.05 significance level to detect a change in Prob(Y = 1) from the value of 0.046 at the mean of X to 0.067 when X is increased to one standard deviation above the mean [32].


Results and discussion

In this study, we evaluated 60 fetuses randomly selected during ultrasound screening. Table 1 presents the mean differences between the measurements collected using prenatal ultrasonography and Doppler sonography, and the accepted Cronbach’s alpha values. Except VSDs, we excluded 43 cardiac anomaly cases. The prevalence of all cardiac anomalies was 6.17% in our cohort. Because most of the parameters in studies change with gestational age, Table 2 presents the distribution of parameters as multiples of medians.

As shown in Table 3, the overall prevalence of VSDs in the screened population was 4.66%. A chi-square test indicated that the prevalence of VSDs exhibited a borderline statistically significant decrease as the GA increased (P = 0.06). The prevalence of VSDs in the male and female fetuses showed nonsignificant differences (4.85% vs. 4.45%, χ2 = 0.15, P = 0.70). After stratifying the data on GA into six age groups, the male fetuses exhibited a higher prevalence of VSDs than the female fetuses did in all GA groups except the 19-week to 23-week subgroup. The chi-square test indicated that the GA-specified prevalence of VSDs was significantly associated with age in the male (P = 0.04), but not the female (P = 0.38), fetuses.

Table 4 presents the characteristics of the fetuses with and without VSDs in the late-second-trimester population. Using the two-sample independent t test, we identified that the GA, NBL, BPD, AC, femur length, tibia length, fibula length, humerus length, ulna length, radius length, estimated FBW, UA PI, UA RI, MCA PI, MCA RI, ratio of the MCA RI to UA PI, and ratio of MCA RI to UA RI were all significantly associated with VSDs.

We then used a multiple logistic regression model to evaluate the effects of independent associated risk factors on VSDs. Table 5 presents the NBLs (odds ratio = 0.69, 95% confidence interval: 0.55 to 0.87), UA PIs (odds ratio = 8.10, 95% confidence interval: 4.31 to 15.21), and MCA PIs (odds ratio = 0.25, 95% confidence interval: 0.12 to 0.54) following adjustment for confounding factors.

Other independent variables included the GA, NBL, BPD, AC, femur length, tibia length, fibula length, humerus length, ulna length, radius length, estimated FBW, UA PIs, UA RIs, MCA PIs, MCA RIs, ratio of the MCA RI to UA PI, and ratio of MCA RI to UA RI, excepting the cardiothoracic area ratio and cardiothoracic circumference ratio.

According to our research, few studies have evaluated the parameters of circulation in fetuses with VSDs in Taiwan. Therefore, the purposes of our study were to evaluate the effects of isolated VSDs on fetal arterial hemodynamics and to determine the prognostic value of fetal arterial Doppler sonography in fetuses with VSDs. The prevalence of intrauterine growth restriction in the VSD and non-VSD groups was estimated as 4.84% and 4.46%, respectively. These results implied that fetuses with isolated VSDs were significantly smaller than the fetuses with normal cardiac anatomy. In addition, our study results indicated that the hemodynamics of the UA and MCA in all fetuses with CHD differed significantly from those of healthy fetuses. These findings support those of previous studies [20-22]. However, from a clinical viewpoint, abnormal UA PIs, UA RIs, MCA PIs, and MCA RIs are no more frequent in fetuses with isolated VSDs than in healthy fetuses. Our results indicated that the UA PI and the MCA PI represent risk factors for fetal VSDs. This finding is consistent with those of other population-based studies [20,22,33].

In this study, the fetuses with VSDs exhibited significantly lower values for fetal biometry and FBW than did the fetuses without VSDs. In Mari and Deter’s study, reductions in the fetal MCA PI were associated with perinatal growth restriction [34]. Lower fetal MCA PI values indicate that the human fetus responds to hypoxemia by centralizing blood flow to the brain in a process known as the brain-sparing effect [35]. A sequence of hemodynamic changes occurs as the fetal condition progressively deteriorates; however, the precise nature of these changes has not been fully elucidated.

Our study results indicated that the risk of fetal VSDs decreases with the degree of NBL shortening. VSDs are the most common lesion in trisomy 21; therefore, identifying fetal VSDs might increase the identification rate of fetuses at risk of developing Down syndrome [36]. Down syndrome is strongly associated with the hypoplastic fetal NBL, and fetal NBL examination is associated with high sensitivity, high specificity, and a low false-positive rate in Down syndrome screening [37,38]. In this study, we followed up the infants with VSDs for 24 months. Most of the infants’ VSDs were spontaneous closures between 6 and 18 months, and 28.6% (36/124) of the cases were spontaneous closures after delivery. In previous studies, the incidence of live-born infants with VSDs ranged from approximately 1 to 4.36% [39,40]. In addition, the proportion of VSD cases in the study population was 4.66%, which is higher than the previously reported rates. A possible reason for this discrepancy is natural fetal loss or pregnancy termination because of abnormalities or malformations of the fetus. Research showed that 74% of isolated fetal VSDs close spontaneously prior to birth [41].

One of the major limitations of this study was the potential for selection bias caused by the use of a screened hospital-based population. However, because of our relatively large sample size, we were able to achieve statistically significant conclusions. Secondly, we did not explicitly consider the sensitivity and specificity of the screening tests. Although the agreement of interobserver reliability seemed acceptable, nondifferential misclassification-bias identification still could have occurred. Thirdly, from the screening cost viewpoint, it is very difficult to follow all of the study cases with postnatal echocardiography. Finally, we collected our measurements at a single point in time, which could have eliminated the influence of various long-term demographic or biochemical factors on the risk of VSDs. Further longitudinal investigations to confirm our study findings are warranted.


Conclusions

In this study we evaluated the NBL, MCA PI, and UA PI of fetuses with VSDs in the late-second trimester of pregnancy. Our results indicate that the evaluation of these parameters provides an appropriate method for the screening of fetal VSDs.


Abbreviations

BPD: biparietal diameter; AC: abdominal circumference; CHD: congenital heart disease; FBW: fetal body weight; GA: gestational age; MCA: middle cerebral artery; NBL: nasal bone length; PI: pulsatility index; RI: resistance index; UA: umbilical artery; VSD: ventricular septal defect.


Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


Authors’ contributions

W-HC and T-HT executed the study and drafted the manuscript. M-CH, R-CC, and T-HT participated in the study design and performed the statistical analyses. M-CH, R-CC, X-MX, and C-LW envisioned the study and coordinated drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.


Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the grants from the National Science Council (NSC-98-2314-B-002-MY3) and Cheng-Hsin General Hospital (100–39, 101–59, 102–39).


References
Yang XY,Li XF,Lü XD,Liu YL,Incidence of congenital heart disease in Beijing, ChinaChin Med JYear: 2009191128113219493457
Capozzi G,Caputo S,Pizzuti R,Martina L,Santoro M,Santoro G,Sarubbi B,Iacono C,D’Alto M,Bigazzi MC,Pacileo G,Merlino E,Caianiello G,Russo MG,Calabrò R,Congenital heart disease in live-born children: incidence, distribution, and yearly changes in the Campania RegionJ Cardiovasc MedYear: 20081936837410.2459/JCM.0b013e3282eee866
Hoffman JI,Kaplan S,The incidence of congenital heart diseaseJ Am Coll CardiolYear: 2002191890190010.1016/S0735-1097(02)01886-712084585
Ozkutlu S,Akça T,Kafalı G,Beksaç S,The results of fetal echocardiography in a tertiary center and comparison of low- and high-risk pregnancies for fetal congenital heart defectsAnadolu Kardiyol DergYear: 20101926326910.5152/akd.2010.06820538563
Paladini D,Russo M,Teodoro A,Pacileo G,Capozzi G,Martinelli P,Nappi C,Calabrò R,Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease in the Naples area during the years 1994–1999 – the experience of a joint fetal-pediatric cardiology unitPrenat DiagnYear: 20021954555210.1002/pd.35612124685
Stoll C,Garne E,Clementi M,Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of associated congenital heart diseases by fetal ultrasonographic examination in EuropePrenat DiagnYear: 20011924325210.1002/pd.3411288111
Yagel S,Silverman NH,Gembruch U,Fetal Cardiology: Embryology, Genetics, Physiology, Echocardiographic Evaluation, Diagnosis, and Perinatal Management of Cardiac DiseasesYear: 20092New York: Informa Healthcare USA, Inc.
Kovalchin JP,Silverman NH,The impact of fetal echocardiographyPediatr CardiolYear: 20041929930615360120
Verheijen PM,Lisowski LA,Stoutenbeek P,Hitchcock JF,Brenner JI,Copel JA,Kleinman CS,Meijboom EJ,Bennink GB,Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease affects preoperative acidosis in the newborn patientJ Thorac Cardiovasc SurgYear: 20011979880310.1067/mtc.2001.11282511279423
Rustico MA,Benettoni A,D’Ottavio G,Maieron A,Fischer-Tamaro I,Conoscenti G,Meir Y,Montesano M,Cattaneo A,Mandruzzato G,Fetal heart screening in low-risk pregnanciesUltrasound Obstet GynecolYear: 19951931331910.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.06050313.x8590200
Canale JM,Sahn DJ,Allen HD,Goldberg SJ,Valdes-Cruz LM,Ovitt TW,Factors affecting real-time, cross-sectional echocardiographic imaging of perimembranous ventricular septal defectsCirculationYear: 19811968969710.1161/01.CIR.63.3.6897460253
Chaoui R,Bollmann R,Fetal color Doppler echocardiography. Part 1: general principles and normal findingsUltraschall MedYear: 19941910010410.1055/s-2007-10039418091193
Chaoui R,McEwing R,Three cross-sectional planes for fetal color Doppler echocardiographyUltrasound Obstet GynecolYear: 200319819310.1002/uog.512528169
Quiñones MA,Otto CM,Stoddard M,Waggoner A,Zoghbi WA,Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. Recommendations for quantification of Doppler echocardiography: a report from the Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of EchocardiographyJ Am Soc EchocardiogrYear: 20021916718410.1067/mje.2002.12020211836492
Chaoui R,Bollmann R,Fetal color Doppler echocardiography. Part 2: abnormalities of the heart and great vesselsUltraschall MedYear: 19941910511110.1055/s-2007-10039428091194
DeVore GR,Horenstein J,Siassi B,Platt LD,Fetal echocardiography. VII. Doppler color flow mapping: a new technique for the diagnosis of congenital heart diseaseAm J Obstet GynecolYear: 1987191054106410.1016/0002-9378(87)90110-43578413
Marx GR,Doppler color flow echocardiography: indispensable application to congenital heart diseaseEchocardiographyYear: 19951941342410.1111/j.1540-8175.1995.tb00567.x10150783
Bahtiyar MO,Dulay AT,Weeks BP,Friedman AH,Copel JA,Prenatal course of isolated muscular ventricular septal defects diagnosed only by color Doppler sonography: single-institution experienceJ Ultrasound MedYear: 20081971572018424646
Khoo NS,van Essen P,Richardson M,Robertson T,Effectiveness of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects in South Australia: a population analysis 1999–2003Aust N Z J Obstet GynaecolYear: 20081955956310.1111/j.1479-828X.2008.00915.x19133043
Meise C,Germer U,Gembruch U,Arterial Doppler ultrasound in 115 second- and third-trimester fetuses with congenital heart diseaseUltrasound Obstet GynecolYear: 20011939840210.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00397.x11380963
Kaltman JR,Di H,Tian Z,Rychik J,Impact of congenital heart disease on cerebrovascular blood flow dynamics in the fetusUltrasound Obstet GynecolYear: 200519323610.1002/uog.178515593334
Guorong L,Shaohui L,Peng J,Huitong L,Boyi L,Wanhong X,Liya L,Cerebrovascular blood flow dynamic changes in fetuses with congenital heart diseaseFetal Diagn TherYear: 20091916717210.1159/00020920319293588
Chiu WH,Tung TH,Chen YS,Wang WH,Lee SM,Horng SC,Yang FY,Normative curves of fetal nasal bone length for the ethnic Chinese populationIr J Med SciYear: 201119737710.1007/s11845-010-0520-420614254
Nisbet D,Robinson H,Halliday J,de CL,Australian Society of Ultrasound in Medicine (ASUM) Policy Statement on normal ultrasonic fetal measurementsAust N Z J Obstet GynaecolYear: 20021910110310.1111/j.0004-8666.2002.00101.x11926635
Goldstein RB,Filly RA,Simpson G,Pitfalls in femur length measurementsJ Ultrasound MedYear: 1987192032073295286
Hadlock FP,Sonographic estimation of fetal age and weightRadiol Clin North AmYear: 19901939502404304
International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics & GynecologyCardiac screening examination of the fetus: guidelines for performing the ‘basic’ and ‘extended basic’ cardiac scanUltrasound Obstet GynecolYear: 20061910711316374757
Rychik J,Ayres N,Cuneo B,Gotteiner N,Hornberger L,Spevak PJ,van der Veld M,American Society of Echocardiography guidelines and standards for performance of the fetal echocardiogramJ Am Soc EchocardiogrYear: 20041980381010.1016/j.echo.2004.04.01115220910
Lethor JP,Marçon F,de Moor M,King ME,Physiology of ventricular septal defect shunt flow in the fetus examined by color Doppler M-modeCirculationYear: 200019E9310.1161/01.CIR.101.10.e9310715273
Merz E,Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyYear: 20052Germany: Thieme
Mari G,Deter RL,Carpenter RL,Rahman F,Zimmerman R,Moise KJ Jr,Dorman KF,Ludomirsky A,Gonzalez R,Gomez R,Oz U,Detti L,Copel JA,Bahado-Singh R,Berry S,Martinez-Poyer J,Blackwell SC,Noninvasive diagnosis by Doppler ultrasonography of fetal anemia due to maternal red-cell alloimmunization. Collaborative Group for Doppler Assessment of the Blood Velocity in Anemic FetusesN Engl J MedYear: 20001991410.1056/NEJM20000106342010210620643
Hsieh FY,Block DA,Larsen MD,A simple method of sample size calculation for linear and logistic regressionStat MedYear: 1998191623163410.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980730)17:14<1623::AID-SIM871>3.0.CO;2-S9699234
McQuillen PS,Miller SP,Congenital heart disease and brain developmentAnn N Y Acad SciYear: 201019688610.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05116.x20146691
Mari G,Deter RL,Middle cerebral artery flow velocity waveforms in normal and small-for-gestational-age fetusesAm J Obstet GynecolYear: 1992191262127010.1016/S0002-9378(11)90620-61566783
Vyas S,Nicolaides KH,Bower S,Campbell S,Middle cerebral artery flow velocity waveforms in fetal hypoxaemiaBr J Obstet GynaecolYear: 19901979780310.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02573.x2242364
Al-Jarallah AS,Down’s syndrome and the pattern of congenital heart disease in a community with high parental consanguinityMed Sci MonitYear: 200919409412
Monni G,Zoppi MA,Ibba RM,Floris M,Manca F,Axiana C,Nuchal translucency and nasal bone for trisomy 21 screening: single center experienceCroat Med JYear: 20051978679116158472
Bunduki V,Ruano R,Miguelez J,Yoshizaki CT,Kahhale S,Zugaib M,Fetal nasal bone length: reference range and clinical application in ultrasound screening for trisomy 21Ultrasound Obstet GynecolYear: 20031915616010.1002/uog.3112601838
Meberg A,Otterstad JE,Frøland G,Søarland S,Nitter-Hauge S,Increasing incidence of ventricular septal defects caused by improved detection rateActa PaediatrYear: 1994196536577919765
Sands AJ,Casey FA,Craig BG,Dornan JC,Rogers J,Mulholland HC,Incidence and risk factors for ventricular septal defect in ‘low risk’ neonatesArch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal EdYear: 199919616310.1136/fn.81.1.F61
Drose JA,Fetal EchocardiographyYear: 20102Philadelphia: Saunders

Figures

[Figure ID: F1]
Figure 1 

Color Doppler flow mapping.



[Figure ID: F2]
Figure 2 

Shunt between the right and left ventricles.



[Figure ID: F3]
Figure 3 

Middle cerebral artery.



[Figure ID: F4]
Figure 4 

Umbilical artery.



Tables
[TableWrap ID: T1] Table 1 

Intraobserver repeatability of fetal biometry and Doppler assessment


  n Repeat measurements Mean difference SE Cronbach’s α value
Nasal bone length
60
2
−0.0033
0.06369
0.999
Biparietal diameter
44
2
−0.0591
0.13224
0.997
Head circumference
44
2
0.1682
0.12055
0.999
Humerus length
44
2
0.1045
0.06950
0.999
Radius length
44
2
0.0523
0.07045
0.998
Ulna length
44
2
0.0182
0.08455
0.998
Femur length
44
2
0.1182
0.07557
0.999
Tibia length
44
2
0.0318
0.06950
0.999
Fibula length
44
2
0.0295
0.08636
0.998
UA PI
60
2
0.0017
0.01659
0.999
UA RI
60
2
0.0010
0.00986
0.997
MCA PI
60
2
−0.0030
0.01816
0.997
MCA RI 60 2 0.0003 0.00367 0.999

MCA, middle cerebral artery; PI, pulsatility index; RI, resistance index; SE, standard error (difference in the paired measurements); UA, umbilical artery.


[TableWrap ID: T2] Table 2 

Distribution of study parameters (multiples of medians)


  19 weeks 20 weeks 21 weeks 22 weeks 23 weeks 24 weeks
Nasal bone length
0.96
0.93
0.95
0.96
0.92
0.90
Biparietal diameter
0.94
0.99
0.98
0.99
0.99
0.97
Head circumference
0.97
0.98
0.98
0.99
0.99
0.98
Abdominal circumference
1.00
0.99
0.98
0.96
0.99
0.99
Femur length
0.99
0.94
0.97
0.97
1.00
0.98
Tibia length
0.98
0.97
0.97
0.98
0.99
0.97
Fibula length
1.00
0.97
0.97
0.98
0.99
0.97
Humerus length
0.95
0.99
0.99
0.98
0.97
0.98
Radius length
0.99
0.96
0.98
0.98
0.98
0.95
Ulna length
1.00
0.99
0.99
0.99
0.99
0.97
Estimated FBW
0.97
0.96
0.96
0.94
0.97
0.99
UA PI
1.60
1.06
1.04
1.06
1.06
1.06
UA RI
1.22
1.05
1.03
1.03
1.01
1.03
MCA PI
0.88
0.95
0.98
0.90
0.92
0.89
MCA RI
0.94
1.00
0.99
0.96
0.98
0.96
MCA/UA PI ratio
0.61
0.93
0.99
0.88
0.99
0.99
MCA/UA RI ratio 0.77 0.98 1.00 0.95 0.96 0.98

FBW, fetal body weight; MCA, middle cerebral artery; MCA/UA PI ratio, ratio of middle cerebral artery resistance index to umbilical artery pulsatility index; MCA/UA RI ratio, ratio of middle cerebral artery resistance index to umbilical artery resistance index; PI, pulsatility index; RI, resistance index; UA, umbilical artery.


[TableWrap ID: T3] Table 3 

Gender and gestational age specific prevalence of ventricular septal defects among screened subjects (n= 2,661)


GA (weeks) Male
Female
Total
 
  Screened ( n ) VSD ( n ) Prevalence (%) P value for trend test Screened ( n ) VSD ( n ) Prevalence (%) P value for trend test Screened ( n ) VSD ( n ) Prevalence (%) P value for trend test
19+0 to 19+6
34
0
0.00
 
48
4
8.33
 
82
4
4.87
 
 
20+0 to 20+6
182
11
6.04
0.04
170
7
4.12
0.38
352
18
5.11
0.06
 
21+0 to 21+6
338
24
7.10
 
284
11
3.87
 
622
35
5.63
 
 
22+0 to 22+6
382
20
5.23
 
340
17
5.00
 
722
37
5.12
 
 
23+0 to 23+6
263
7
2.66
 
270
15
5.56
 
533
22
4.13
 
 
24+0 to 24+6
182
5
2.74
 
168
3
1.79
 
350
8
2.29
 
 
Total 1,381 67 4.85   1,280 57 4.45   2,661 124 4.66    

GA, gestational age; VSD, ventricular septal defect.


[TableWrap ID: T4] Table 4 

Characteristics of ventricular septal defect (VSD) among screened subjects (n= 2,661)


Variable  
Normal (n= 2,537)
 
VSD (n= 124)
P value
Mean ± SD 10 to 90% Mean ± SD 10 to 90%
NBL (mm)
6.74 ± 0.87
5.60 to 7.90
6.40 ± 0.79
5.30 to 7.40
<0.0001
BPD (mm)
54.33 ± 9.10
48.00 to 60.00
52.65 ± 4.87
47.12 to 59.70
0.041
HC (mm)
197.34 ± 15.57
177.00 to 218.00
193.94 ± 14.66
175.00 to 213.40
0.017
AC (mm)
177.08 ± 16.15
156.00 to 198.00
171.36 ± 16.12
150.82 to 194.45
<0.0001
Femur length (mm)
37.33 ± 3.86
32.50 to 42.40
35.93 ± 3.78
30.72 to 41.10
<0.0001
Tibia length (mm)
32.92 ± 3.42
28.30 to 37.30
31.90 ± 3.53
27.12 to 36.92
0.001
Fibula length (mm)
32.76 ± 3.33
28.35 to 37.00
31.71 ± 3.27
26.88 to 36.00
0.001
Humerus length (mm)
35.39 ± 3.34
31.00 to 39.70
34.40 ± 3.24
29.94 to 38.70
0.001
Radius length (mm)
30.34 ± 2.94
26.70 to 34.00
29.38 ± 2.70
25.70 to 32.46
<0.0001
Ulna length (mm)
32.92 ± 3.21
28.80 to 37.00
32.07 ± 3.14
28.00 to 36.30
0.004
Estimated FBW (g)
508.75 ± 116.48
364.00 to 666.00
470.74 ± 107.31
343.60 to 608.20
<0.0001
CTAR
0.22 ± 0.12
0.18 to 0.25
0.21 ± 0.03
0.18 to 0.25
0.753
CTCR
0.46 ± 0.06
0.42 to 0.50
0.46 ± 0.03
0.43 to 0.50
0.131
UA PI
1.16 ± 0.22
0.93 to 1.40
1.33 ± 0.34
0.99 to 1.91
<0.0001
UA RI
0.69 ± 0.08
0.60 to 0.78
0.74 ± 0.09
0.64 to 0.86
<0.0001
MCA PI
1.59 ± 0.27
1.26 to 1.90
1.48 ± 0.24
1.18 to 1.82
<0.0001
MCA RI
0.81 ± 0.08
0.72 to 0.91
0.79 ± 0.65
0.71 to 0.87
0.008
MCA/UA PI ratio
1.41 ± 0.34
1.02 to 1.79
1.19 ± 0.38
0.66 to 1.67
<0.0001
MCA/UA RI ratio 1.19 ± 0.18 0.99 to 1.40 1.09 ± 0.18 0.85 to 1.30 <0.0001

AC, abdominal circumference; BPD, biparietal diameter; CTAR, cardiothoracic area ratio; CTCR, cardiothoracic circumference ratio; FBW, fetal body weight; HC, head circumference; MCA, middle cerebral artery; MCA/UA PI ratio, ratio of middle cerebral artery resistance index to umbilical artery pulsatility index; MCA/UA RI ratio, ratio of middle cerebral artery resistance index to umbilical artery resistance index; NBL, nasal bone length; PI, pulsatility index; RI, resistance index; SD, standard deviation; UA, umbilical artery; VSD, ventricular septal defect.


[TableWrap ID: T5] Table 5 

Multiple logistic regression of associated factors for ventricular septal defects among screened fetuses (n= 2,661)


Variable β SE Ventricular septal defects (yes vs. no)
P value
Odds ratio 95% confidence interval
NBL
−0.37
0.12
0.69
0.55 to 0.87
0.001
UA PI
 2.09
0.32
8.10
4.31 to 15.21
<0.0001
MCA PI −1.37 0.38 0.25 0.12 to 0.54 <0.0001

MCA, middle cerebral artery; NBL, nasal bone length; PI, pulsatility index; UA, umbilical artery; SE, standard error.



Article Categories:
  • Research

Keywords: Ultrasonography, Ventricular septal defects, Second trimester.

Previous Document:  Reducing hospital admissions from nursing homes: a systematic review.
Next Document:  Allosteric modulation of GABAA receptors by extracellular ATP.