Document Detail

Pregnancy induces transcriptional activation of the peripheral innate immune system and increases oxidative DNA damage among healthy third trimester pregnant women.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23133592     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Pregnancy induces physiological adaptations that may involve, or contribute to, alterations in the genomic landscape. Pregnancy also increases the nutritional demand for choline, an essential nutrient that can modulate epigenomic and transcriptomic readouts secondary to its role as a methyl donor. Nevertheless, the interplay between human pregnancy, choline and the human genome is largely unexplored.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: As part of a controlled feeding study, we assessed the influence of pregnancy and choline intake on maternal genomic markers. Healthy third trimester pregnant (n = 26, wk 26-29 gestation) and nonpregnant (n = 21) women were randomized to choline intakes of 480 mg/day, approximating the Adequate Intake level, or 930 mg/day for 12-weeks. Blood leukocytes were acquired at study week 0 and study week 12 for microarray, DNA damage and global DNA/histone methylation measurements. A main effect of pregnancy that was independent of choline intake was detected on several of the maternal leukocyte genomic markers. Compared to nonpregnant women, third trimester pregnant women exhibited higher (P<0.05) transcript abundance of defense response genes associated with the innate immune system including pattern recognition molecules, neutrophil granule proteins and oxidases, complement proteins, cytokines and chemokines. Pregnant women also exhibited higher (P<0.001) levels of DNA damage in blood leukocytes, a genomic marker of oxidative stress. No effect of choline intake was detected on the maternal leukocyte genomic markers with the exception of histone 3 lysine 4 di-methylation which was lower among pregnant women in the 930 versus 480 mg/d choline intake group.
CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy induces transcriptional activation of the peripheral innate immune system and increases oxidative DNA damage among healthy third trimester pregnant women.
Authors:
Xinyin Jiang; Haim Y Bar; Jian Yan; Allyson A West; Cydne A Perry; Olga V Malysheva; Srisatish Devapatla; Eva Pressman; Francoise M Vermeylen; Martin T Wells; Marie A Caudill
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.     Date:  2012-11-02
Journal Detail:
Title:  PloS one     Volume:  7     ISSN:  1932-6203     ISO Abbreviation:  PLoS ONE     Publication Date:  2012  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-11-07     Completed Date:  2013-05-07     Revised Date:  2013-07-11    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101285081     Medline TA:  PLoS One     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  e46736     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Case-Control Studies
Choline / metabolism
Cluster Analysis
DNA Damage*
Diet
Epigenomics
Female
Gene Expression Profiling
Gene Expression Regulation
Genome, Human
Genomics
Histones / metabolism
Humans
Immunity, Innate*
Interleukin-6 / biosynthesis
Leukocytes / metabolism
Leukocytes, Mononuclear / cytology
Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis / methods
Oxidative Stress
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Trimester, Third
Transcriptional Activation*
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha / biosynthesis
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Histones; 0/Interleukin-6; 0/Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; 62-49-7/Choline
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): PLoS One
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): PLoS ONE
Journal ID (publisher-id): plos
Journal ID (pmc): plosone
ISSN: 1932-6203
Publisher: Public Library of Science, San Francisco, USA
Article Information
Download PDF
Copyright: 2012 Jiang et al
License:
Received Day: 22 Month: 8 Year: 2012
Accepted Day: 4 Month: 9 Year: 2012
collection publication date: Year: 2012
Electronic publication date: Day: 2 Month: 11 Year: 2012
Volume: 7 Issue: 11
E-location ID: e46736
PubMed Id: 23133592
ID: 3487782
Publisher Id: PONE-D-12-25956
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046736

Pregnancy Induces Transcriptional Activation of the Peripheral Innate Immune System and Increases Oxidative DNA Damage among Healthy Third Trimester Pregnant Women Alternate Title:Pregnancy Alters Genomic Marks in Blood Leukocytes
Xinyin Jiang1
Haim Y. Bar2
Jian Yan1
Allyson A. West1
Cydne A. Perry1
Olga V. Malysheva1
Srisatish Devapatla3
Eva Pressman4
Francoise M. Vermeylen2
Martin T. Wells5
Marie A. Caudill1*
Aftab A. Ansariedit1 Role: Editor
1Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
2Cornell University Statistical Consulting Unit, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
3Department of Pediatrics, Cayuga Medical Center, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
4Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America
5Department of Statistical Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
Emory University School of Medicine, United States of America
Correspondence: * E-mail: mac379@cornell.edu
[conflict] Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Contributed by footnote: Conceived and designed the experiments: XJ MAC. Performed the experiments: XJ JY AAW CAP OVM SD EP. Analyzed the data: HYB FV MTW. Wrote the paper: XJ MAC.

Introduction

Pregnancy induces several physiological adaptations to meet the needs of the developing fetus and the health requirements of the mother. Many of these pregnancy-induced physiologic adaptations may involve, or contribute to, alterations in the genomic landscape. Nevertheless, very few studies have examined the interplay between pregnancy and the human genome.

A prominent change during pregnancy is the modulation of the immune system to accommodate the presence of a semiallogeneic fetus [1]. In normal pregnancy, there is a shift in the balance of T lymphocytes, mediators of the adaptive cellular immune response, towards a Th2 (immunosuppressive) phenotype with an anti-inflammatory cytokine profile. However, there is also a need to defend against pathogens for the mother-fetus dyad [2]. Neutrophils, mediators of the innate immune response that play a key role in the first line of defense against pathogens, increase in peripheral blood during pregnancy [3]. Nevertheless, it is unclear as to whether these neutrophils are activated. In vitro studies showed that neutrophils from pregnant women exhibited reduced microbial killing and chemotaxis [4], [5]. However, flow cytometry studies showed that several neutrophil surface markers were higher in the pregnant state indicating neutrophil activation [6], [7]. Thus, studies that profile the transcriptome of blood leukocytes are needed to better understand the status of the immune system during human pregnancy.

A greater susceptibility to oxidative stress, mostly because of the mitochondria-rich placenta [8], is another characteristic of human pregnancy. Oxidative stress can cause DNA damage [9], which in turn can lead to aberrant gene expression and apoptosis. Although higher levels of DNA damage are detected among women with complicated pregnancies [9], [10], it is unclear whether DNA damage is elevated in normal pregnancy. Studies that examine indicators of DNA damage are needed to advance understanding of redox balance during normal pregnancy and to inform nutritional therapeutic opportunities.

Pregnancy is also associated with an increased demand for methyl donors to maintain epigenetic marks in the expanding maternal and fetal tissues [11]. DNA and histone methylation play a fundamental role in regulating chromatin structure, stability, and gene expression [12], [13]. A major source of methyl groups for DNA and histone methylation is the essential micronutrient choline, which is recommended at an intake level of 450 mg/d during pregnancy [14]. Notably, we previously demonstrated in third trimester pregnant women that consumption of choline at approximately two times the current intake recommendation (i.e., 930 versus 480 mg/d) substantially altered epigenetic marks [15] and transcriptome readouts (unpublished data) in fetal derived tissues (i.e., placental and cord blood leukocytes). Nonetheless, it remains to be determined if a maternal choline intake exceeding current recommendations can alter genomic marks in the mothers themselves.

The aims of the current study were to investigate the influence of both pregnancy and maternal choline intake on leukocyte genomic markers. To accomplish these aims, we examined genome-wide gene expression, DNA damage, and global DNA/histone methylation in blood leukocytes obtained from third trimester pregnant women and nonpregnant control women enrolled in a 12-week controlled feeding study [16].


Materials and Methods
Study Participants

Healthy third trimester (week 26–29 gestation) singleton pregnant women and nonpregnant control women aged ≥21 y were recruited from Ithaca, New York, and surrounding areas between January 2009 and October 2010. Entry into the study was contingent upon good health status, no tobacco or alcohol use, and a willingness to comply with the study protocol. Twenty-six of the 29 pregnant women and 21 of the 22 nonpregnant women who started the study completed it. Information regarding the study participants and the CONSORT flowchart have been reported previously [16].

Description of procedures
Study Design and Diet

This was a 12-week controlled feeding study in which pregnant (n = 26) and nonpregnant (n = 21) women were randomized to either 480 (an intake level that approximates the choline adequate intake, AI) or 930 mg choline/d. The choline was derived from the diet (380 mg/d) plus supplemental choline chloride (either 100 or 550 mg choline/d for the 480 or 930 mg/d intake levels, respectively). Throughout the 12-wk study, the participants consumed a 7-day cycle menu. Choline-free prenatal multivitamins and docosahexaenoic acid supplements were provided daily as detailed in Yan et al [16]. The fact that all participants consumed the same diet and supplements makes this study particularly suitable to examining the effects of pregnancy on a wide-array of genomic and metabolic endpoints.

Sample collection

Blood samples were obtained at study-baseline (week 0) and study-end (week 12). Fasting (10-h) peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC, including lymphocytes and monocytes) samples were retrieved with Vacutainer CPT tubes (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ); whole blood, leukocyte and plasma samples were retrieved with EDTA tubes (BD) as previously described [16], [17].

Analytical measurements

Complete blood counts were conducted with 1 mL whole blood using an AcT diff 2 hematology analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Total RNA purification was performed with a commercially available kit (RNeasy Mini kit, Qiagen, Valencia, CA) as previously detailed [15]. The integrity of the RNA samples was determined using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Only samples of an RNA Integrity Number (RIN) >8.0 were included for microarray. There were 12 sets (a set includes both a wk-0 and a wk-12 measurement) of samples from pregnant participants (n =  6/choline intake group) and 10 sets of samples from nonpregnant participants (n = 5/choline intake group) that passed the RIN cutoff.

Gene expression profiling was performed using the Whole Human Gene Expression Microarray 4×44 K (Agilent). Antisense RNA amplification and cyanine-3 labeling was performed with an Amino Allyl MessageAmp II aRNA amplification kit (Ambion Inc., Grand island, NY). Microarray hybridization was performed at 65°C for 17-h in an Agilent Microarray Hybridization oven. Microarray scanning was performed in an Agilent Scanner (G2505C) and the images were extracted using Agilent Feature Extraction Software 10.5. Data normalization was performed using log2 transformation and median normalization. An extension of the Laplace approximation EM Microarray Analysis (LEMMA) package based on the R software platform (http://www.R-project.org) [18] developed by Bar et al. [19], [20] was used to detect differentially expressed genes. The version used here (unpublished data) can sensitively detect differentially expressed genes, as it takes into account not only mean differences, but also variational differences between the comparison groups. Using this method we were able to increase the number of discoveries of differentially expressed genes, relative to other methods that do not account for differential variation. The differentially expressed genes were declared by controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) with Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) correction <0.05 and expression fold difference >2. Differentially expressed genes were classified according to their gene ontology (GO) using High-Throughput GoMiner [21]. Hierarchical clustering was conducted with MultiExperiment Viewer [22], [23]. Microarray results of select genes were verified using quantitative real-time PCR. All data is MIAME compliant. The data has been deposited in a MIAME compliant database NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus [24] as detailed on the MGED Society website (http://www.mged.org/Workgroups/MIAME/miame.html) and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE36532 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE36532).

Reverse transcription and quantitative real-time PCR were performed as previously described [25]. Data are expressed using the delta delta Ct method [26] and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) is used as the housekeeping gene.

Circulating tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) and interleukin 6 (IL6) were measured in EDTA plasma with commercially available ELISA kits (R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) DNA damage was measured in duplicate via the alkaline version of single-cell gel electrophoresis (COMET assay). Sample preparation was performed as described previously [17]. DNA migration from the nucleus was visualized (75 cells/sample) with an Olympus BX-50 light microscope and a high resolution QImaging Retiga EXi cooled CCD camera. Photos were acquired using the MetaMorph Premier (ver. 7.0) software (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) after staining with SYBR Gold fluorescent dye (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY). Percent tail DNA (defined as the proportion of DNA that has migrated from the nucleus) was used as an index of DNA damage and was calculated using the software Komet 6.0 (Andor Technology, South Windsor, CT).

Global DNA methylation was measured in leukocytes using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) as described by Song et al. [27] with modifications based on our instrumentation [17]. Global DNA methylation [5-methyl-2′-deoxycytidine (5mdC)] is expressed as a percentage of 2′-deoxyguanosine (representing total 2′-deoxycytidine).

Global histone methylation was measured with western blots as described previously [15]. Leukocyte samples (200 µL) were suspended in 0.2 N hydrochloric acid at 4°C overnight. The extracts were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to Immobilon-FL polyvinylidene fluoride transfer membranes. Membranes were incubated with corresponding primary and secondary antibodies [15]. Target protein bands were quantified with the LI-COR Odyssey® imaging system (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE) and expressed as the ratio of intensity of the histone epigenetic mark to the reference total histone 3 proteins.

Ethics

The study was approved by the Cornell University and Cayuga Medical Center Institutional Review Boards for Human Participants and written informed consent was obtained from every participant prior to study entry. The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01127022.

Statistical analysis

The effect of pregnancy on the dependent variables (e.g. DNA damage, epigenetic marks, gene expression) was assessed at study-baseline (wk-0) and study-end (wk-12) separately with general linear models (GLMs). Pregnancy status and choline intake were included as independent variables and all two-way interactions were tested. The effect of choline intake on the genomic markers was assessed at study-end in a similar manner with study-baseline data included as a covariate. All of the analyses included leukocyte sub-population (e.g. the percentage of granulocytes) as a covariate with the exception of the DNA damage variable which only contains PBMCs. Additional candidates for entry as covariates into the statistical models are listed in Table 1. Covariates and interaction terms that did not achieve a statistical significance of P≤0.05 were removed from the models in a stepwise process.

Plots and histograms of the residuals were used to assess normality in the models. Dependent variables that deviated from the normal distribution (e.g. global histone methylation and quantitative PCR data) were logarithmically transformed to meet the assumption of normality. Differences were considered to be significant at P≤0.05; P<0.10 was considered to be indicative of trends. Values are presented as means ± SEM. If covariates were retained in the final models, the values presented are predicted means; P values are two-tailed. All analyses were performed using SPSS (release 18.0 for Windows, SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL).


Results
Participant characteristics

The characteristics of the study population at study-baseline (wk-0) are shown in Table 1. Third trimester pregnant and nonpregnant women did not differ in their age, ethnicity/race, pre-pregnancy BMI, education, or physical activity. However, vitamin supplement consumption was greater (P<0.01) among pregnant women. No differences (P>0.13) in the baseline characteristics were detected among the choline intake groups (Table 1). All pregnant women delivered their babies at term without major complications and their babies were apparently healthy [16].

The effects of choline

No main effects of choline (P>0.05) were detected for any of the dependent variables. However, choline intake interacted (P = 0.03) with pregnancy status to affect H3K4me2. After stratifying by pregnancy status, H3K4me2 was higher (P = 0.04, controlling for the leukocyte sub-populations) in the 930 versus 480 mg choline/d group among pregnant women (Figure 1). This relationship did not achieve statistical significance among nonpregnant women (P = 0.12). No additional choline × pregnancy interactions (P>0.05) were detected.

The effects of pregnancy

A main effect of pregnancy was detected for several of the dependent variables at study-baseline and study-end (values taken after controlled feeding and choline randomization) as described in subsequent text. The pregnancy effect was not modified by choline intake (i.e., no significant pregnancy × choline interactions were detected for any of the variables) at study-end indicating an effect of pregnancy that is independent of choline intake.

Peripheral blood leukocyte counts

Granulocytes and monocytes are important components of the innate immune system. Third trimester pregnant women exhibited higher (P<0.01) granulocyte counts (the majority of which was neutrophils) and borderline higher (P<0.09) monocyte counts than nonpregnant women at both study-baseline and study-end. Lymphocyte count was not altered by pregnancy (Table 2).

Leukocyte genome wide expression

There were 1068 upregulated and 244 downregulated genes at study-baseline, and 1048 upregulated and 280 downregulated genes at study-end, in pregnant versus nonpregnant women (Figure 2). Of these ∼1300 differentially expressed genes, 932 were altered at both study-baseline and study-end (Table S1). The differential expression of select genes was verified by quantitative PCR (Table 3). Gene expression did not differ between study-end and study-baseline, suggesting that the leukocyte gene expression profile was stable throughout the third trimester of pregnancy.

The GO analyses conducted at study-baseline and study-end showed similar biological themes: thus, only the GO results at study-end are presented. At study-end, 246 molecular function categories were altered (P<0.01) (Table S2), ∼40% of which was related to immune response. The GO of defense response (GO: 0006952) showed the most significant alteration. Of the 112 defense response genes altered, 105 were upregulated in third trimester pregnant women as compared to nonpregnant women (Figure 3). To evaluate whether the elevated expression of defense response genes was mediated at least in part by the activation of granulocytes, we used leukocyte sub-population as a covariate in the statistical models. After adjusting for leukocyte sub-populations, the greater expression of the defense response genes among pregnant women was maintained (examples are shown in Table 3 and 4), suggesting that the higher expression of defense response genes was not solely a function of higher granulocyte counts, but also due to enhanced activation of the granulocytes.

Among pregnant women, several components of the toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling pathway were upregulated, including the genes encoding TLR1, 4, 5, 6; the CD molecule 14 (CD14), a major surface marker of neutrophils and monocytes that interacts with TLR4; and myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MYD88). The TLRs are pattern recognition molecules on immune cells (e.g., neutrophils) that recognize pathogenic elements (e.g., lipopolysaccharides) and illicit a signaling cascade involving MYD88 that results in the increased production of proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 1β (IL1β) and the chemokine interleukin 8 (IL8) [28], [29]. The increased IL8 production favors chemotaxis and survival of the neutrophils [30].

Third trimester pregnant women also exhibited higher expression of genes encoding: (i) the microbicidal proteins stored in the neutrophil granules [e.g. the azurophil proteins elastase (ELANE), alpha-defensins (DEFA) and specific granule proteins lactoferrin (LTF) and catheticidin (CAMP)]; (ii) the complement proteins involved in innate humoral immune response [e.g. complement component 1, q subcomponent, B chain (C1QB), complement component 2 (C2) and complement component (3 b/4 b) receptor 1 (CR1)]; (iii) proteins involved in neutrophil superoxide anion production [e.g. the NADPH oxidase complex neutrophil cytosolic factors (NCF), and myeloperoxidase (MPO)]; and (iv) the proinflammatory cytokines (e.g. IL1B). The GO of TNF (GO:0032640) and IL6 (GO:0032675) production were also upregulated.

Only a few (∼8) immune response genes were downregulated among pregnant women after controlling for the leukocyte sub-populations. The repressed genes were mostly associated with the adaptive immune response (Table 5) and included: (i) the transmembrane glycoprotein CD1 family members CD1c and CD1e molecules, which present primary lipid and glycolipid antigens to T cells [31]; (ii) the chemokine (C-C motif) receptors CCR6 and CCR9, which are preferably expressed by T cells [32], [33]; (iii) CD70 molecule, a surface antigen on activated T and B lymphocytes [34] and (iv) B-cell linker protein (BLNK), which plays an important role in B cell development and receptor signaling [35].

Plasma TNFαand IL6

Circulating concentrations of TNFα were higher among pregnant women at study-end (1.18±0.09 vs. 0.94±0.07 pg/mL, P = 0.05) but not at study-baseline (1.19±0.16 vs. 0.94±0.09 pg/mL, P = 0.19). IL6 was elevated among pregnant women at both study-baseline (1.22±0.19 vs. 0.73±0.07 pg/mL, P = 0.02) and study-end (1.50±0.15 vs. 0.73±0.10 pg/mL, P<0.01) (Figure 4). The higher circulating concentrations of TNFα and IL6 among pregnant women at study-end corresponded with the microarray GO results showing upregulation of TNF and IL6 production.

Leukocyte percent tail DNA

Third trimester pregnant women had significantly higher (P<0.01) percent tail DNA than nonpregnant women at study-baseline and study-end (Table 6). The higher percent tail DNA represents greater DNA strand breakage due to oxidative stress.

Leukocyte global histone and DNA methylation

Third trimester pregnant women (versus nonpregnant women) had lower levels of the transcription activation histone mark H3K4me2 (P<0.01), and the transcription repression mark H3K9me2 (P = 0.05) at study-baseline and study-end (not controlling for leukocyte sub-populations) (Figure 5, A and C). However, after controlling for leukocyte sub-populations, the effect of pregnancy disappeared (Figure 5, B and D), suggesting that the alterations in leukocyte H3K9me2 and H3K4me2 during pregnancy were a function of the shift in the leukocyte sub-populations and that different leukocyte cell types may have a different abundance of these histone modifications. Global DNA methylation (study-baseline or study-end) was not altered (P>0.38) by pregnancy (Table 6).


Discussion

Genomic markers were investigated among healthy third trimester pregnant and nonpregnant control women to advance our understanding of pregnancy induced alterations in immune response, redox balance, and epigenomic stability. The effect of maternal choline intake on these genomic markers was also investigated secondary to the role of choline as a methyl donor. Under both uncontrolled (study-baseline) and controlled (study-end) dietary conditions, our data demonstrate that healthy third trimester pregnant women experience transcriptional activation of the peripheral innate immune system and elevated oxidative stress as indicated by higher DNA damage. Our data also indicate that a choline intake exceeding current dietary recommendations does not alter blood leukocyte genomic markers, except for H3K4me2 among third-trimester pregnant women.

The effects of pregnancy
Immune Function

Pregnant women experienced an elevation in the transcript abundance of 105 leukocyte defense response genes as compared to nonpregnant control women. The majority of upregulated defense genes were neutrophil-associated genes including neutrophil surface markers (e.g. CD14), pattern recognition molecules, cytokines, chemokines, neutrophil granule proteins, complement proteins and neutrophil oxidases. Importantly, the greater transcription of these host defense genes among third trimester pregnant women persisted after controlling for the leukocyte sub-populations, indicating transcriptional activation, rather than suppression, of individual neutrophils. The activation of peripheral neutrophils (and the innate immune system) during the last third of human pregnancy may serve as a compensatory mechanism to protect the maternal-fetal dyad against pathogens when the adaptive immune response is suppressed. Overall our data provide a blueprint of pregnancy induced changes in the peripheral blood transcriptome and elucidate new pathways and molecules that function in the modulation of the immune system during the third trimester of human pregnancy.

Oxidative stress and DNA damage

Leukocyte DNA damage was approximately two times greater among third trimester pregnant women than nonpregnant control women. This elevation in DNA damage among pregnant women may arise from increases in oxidative stress particularly as pregnancy advances [9]. Healthy pregnant women were previously thought to overcome oxidative stress through upregulation of antioxidation machinery [36], [37]. However, our study suggests that DNA damage commonly occurs throughout the last third of uncomplicated pregnancies.

It is noteworthy that oxidative stress and immune activation are interrelated. Neutrophils are both activated by, and a producer of, reactive oxygen species. TLR4 signaling is enhanced by reactive oxygen species, leading to sustained production of proinflammatory proteins, which in turn maintain oxidative stress [38]. In addition, activated neutrophils are a significant source of reactive oxygen species via the activity of NADPH oxidase and myeloperoxidase (MPO) [39], which were both upregulated among pregnant women in our study. Although the increased oxidative stress appears to be a normal event of pregnancy, the DNA damage by reactive oxygen species can lead to genomic instability, aberrant gene expression and apoptosis [40], [41]. Additional studies are needed to address the health effects of pregnancy-induced leukocyte DNA damage and whether the DNA damage resolves after delivery.

The effects of choline intake

A higher maternal choline intake during pregnancy increased dimethylation of H3K4, which is indicative of active transcription [42]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report in humans that choline intake affected an epigenetic mark of histones obtained from leukocytes of pregnant women. Nevertheless, we did not observe a corresponding change in leukocyte gene expression by choline intake within the time frame of this study and no other genomic marks were affected by maternal choline intake. Thus, unlike the genomic marks (e.g., DNA methylation [15] and transcriptome profiles (unpublished data) of developing fetal-derived tissues (i.e., placenta and cord blood leukocytes) which are highly responsive to maternal choline intake, genomic markers of maternal-derived tissue may be relatively unresponsive to changes in maternal choline intake.

Limitations

Our study has two major limitations. First, data collection was limited to the third trimester of pregnancy; thus, additional studies are needed to address the effects of pregnancy and maternal choline intake on maternal genomic marks in earlier stages of gestation as well as in the postnatal period. Second, genomic marks from peripheral blood sampling do not necessarily reflect genomic marks in other tissues. Nonetheless, blood transcript profiling is considered a robust tool for assessing the status of the human immune system [43], [44], [45].

Conclusions

In summary, the last third of human pregnancy is characterized by transcriptional activation of the neutrophils and elevations in maternal leukocyte oxidative DNA damage. These findings are consistent with an upregulation of the peripheral innate immune system which plays a central role in protecting the maternal and fetal dyad against pathogens. Additional studies are needed to delineate the long-term functional consequences of these genomic alterations and to investigate the relationship between these genomic marks and complicated pregnancy.


Supporting Information Table S1

Genes differentially expressed in third trimester pregnant women and non-pregnant women at week 0 (baseline) and week 12 (study end) of the controlled feeding study. Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted P values<0.05; Data were analyzed with the LEMMA statistical package.

(XLSX)


Click here for additional data file (pone.0046736.s001.xlsx)

Table S2

Gene ontology altered in third trimester pregnant women and non-pregnant women at week 12 (study end) of the controlled feeding study. Data were analyzed with Gominer.

(XLSX)


Click here for additional data file (pone.0046736.s002.xlsx)


References
1. Wegmann TG,, Lin H,, Guilbert L,, Mosmann TR, (Year: 1993) Bidirectional cytokine interactions in the maternal-fetal relationship: is successful pregnancy a TH2 phenomenon?Immunol Today14: 353–3568363725
2. Witkin SS,, Linhares IM,, Bongiovanni AM,, Herway C,, Skupski D, (Year: 2011) Unique alterations in infection-induced immune activation during pregnancy. BJOG118: 145–15321054766
3. Belo L,, Santos-Silva A,, Rocha S,, Caslake M,, Cooney J,, et al. (Year: 2005) Fluctuations in C-reactive protein concentration and neutrophil activation during normal human pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol123: 46–5116260340
4. Crocker I,, Lawson N,, Daniels I,, Baker P,, Fletcher J, (Year: 1999) Significance of fatty acids in pregnancy-induced immunosuppression. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology6: 587–59310391868
5. Crouch SP,, Crocker IP,, Fletcher J, (Year: 1995) The effect of pregnancy on polymorphonuclear leukocyte function. J Immunol155: 5436–54437594561
6. Luppi P,, Haluszczak C,, Trucco M,, Deloia JA, (Year: 2002) Normal pregnancy is associated with peripheral leukocyte activation. Am J Reprod Immunol47: 72–8111900591
7. Sacks GP,, Studena K,, Sargent K,, Redman CW, (Year: 1998) Normal pregnancy and preeclampsia both produce inflammatory changes in peripheral blood leukocytes akin to those of sepsis. Am J Obstet Gynecol179: 80–869704769
8. Casanueva E,, Viteri FE, (Year: 2003) Iron and oxidative stress in pregnancy. J Nutr133: 1700S–1708S12730487
9. Furness DL,, Dekker GA,, Roberts CT, (Year: 2011) DNA damage and health in pregnancy. J Reprod Immunol89: 153–16221511343
10. Harma M,, Kocyigit A,, Erel O, (Year: 2005) Increased DNA damage in patients with complete hydatidiform mole. Mutat Res583: 49–5415866465
11. Zeisel SH, (Year: 2009) Importance of methyl donors during reproduction. Am J Clin Nutr89: 673S–677S19116320
12. Kass SU,, Pruss D,, Wolffe AP, (Year: 1997) How does DNA methylation repress transcription?Trends in Genetics13: 444–4499385841
13. Cheung P,, Lau P, (Year: 2005) Epigenetic regulation by histone methylation and histone variants. Molecular Endocrinology19: 563–57315677708
14. Institute of Medicine (1998) Dietary reference intakes for thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, vitamin B6, folate, vitamin B12, pantothenic acid, biotin and choline. Washington, DC: National Academy Press: 390–422.
15. Jiang X,, Yan J,, West AA,, Perry CA,, Malysheva OV. , et al. (Year: 2012) Maternal choline intake alters the epigenetic state of fetal cortisol-regulating genes in humans. FASEB J
16. Yan J,, Jiang X,, West AA,, Perry CA,, Malysheva OV,, et al. (Year: 2012) Maternal choline intake modulates maternal and fetal biomarkers of choline metabolism in humans. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition95: 1060–107122418088
17. Shin W,, Yan J,, Abratte CM,, Vermeylen F,, Caudill MA, (Year: 2010) Choline intake exceeding current dietary recommendations preserves markers of cellular methylation in a genetic subgroup of folate-compromised men. Journal of Nutrition140: 975–98020220206
18. R Development Core Team (2011) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
19. Bar H, Schifano E (2010) Lemma: Laplace approximated EM Microarray Analysis.
20. Bar H,, Booth J,, Schifano E,, Wells MT, (Year: 2010) Laplace Approximated EM Microarray Analysis: An Empirical Bayes Approach for Comparative Microarray Experiments. Statistical Science25: 388–407
21. Zeeberg BR,, Qin H,, Narasimhan S,, Sunshine M,, Cao H,, et al. (Year: 2005) High-Throughput GoMiner, an ‘industrial-strength’ integrative gene ontology tool for interpretation of multiple-microarray experiments, with application to studies of Common Variable Immune Deficiency (CVID). BMC Bioinformatics6: 16815998470
22. Saeed AI,, Bhagabati NK,, Braisted JC,, Liang W,, Sharov V,, et al. (Year: 2006) TM4 microarray software suite. Methods Enzymol411: 134–19316939790
23. Saeed AI,, Sharov V,, White J,, Li J,, Liang W,, et al. (Year: 2003) TM4: a free, open-source system for microarray data management and analysis. Biotechniques34: 374–37812613259
24. Edgar R,, Domrachev M,, Lash AE, (Year: 2002) Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res30: 207–21011752295
25. Chew TW,, Jiang XY,, Yan J,, Wang W,, Lusa AL,, et al. (Year: 2011) Folate Intake, Mthfr Genotype, and Sex Modulate Choline Metabolism in Mice. Journal of Nutrition141: 1475–148121697299
26. Livak KJ,, Schmittgen TD, (Year: 2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods25: 402–40811846609
27. Song L,, James SR,, Kazim L,, Karpf AR, (Year: 2005) Specific method for the determination of genomic DNA methylation by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem77: 504–51015649046
28. Drewniak A,, Tool ATJ,, Geissler J,, van Bruggen R,, van den Berg TK,, et al. (Year: 2010) Toll-like receptor-induced reactivity and strongly potentiated IL-8 production in granulocytes mobilized for transfusion purposes. Blood115: 4588–459620354173
29. Grishman EK,, White PC,, Savani RC, (Year: 2012) Toll-like receptors, the NLRP3 inflammasome, and interleukin-1beta in the development and progression of type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Res
30. Mantovani A,, Cassatella MA,, Costantini C,, Jaillon S, (Year: 2011) Neutrophils in the activation and regulation of innate and adaptive immunity. Nat Rev Immunol11: 519–53121785456
31. Dascher CC,, Brenner MB, (Year: 2003) CD1 antigen presentation and infectious disease. Contrib Microbiol10: 164–18212530326
32. Oldham KA,, Parsonage G,, Bhatt RI,, Wallace DM,, Deshmukh N,, et al. (Year: 2012) T lymphocyte recruitment into renal cell carcinoma tissue: a role for chemokine receptors CXCR3, CXCR6, CCR5, and CCR6. Eur Urol61: 385–39422079021
33. Stenstad H,, Ericsson A,, Johansson-Lindbom B,, Svensson M,, Marsal J,, et al. (Year: 2006) Gut-associated lymphoid tissue-primed CD4+ T cells display CCR9-dependent and -independent homing to the small intestine. Blood107: 3447–345416391017
34. Denoeud J,, Moser M, (Year: 2011) Role of CD27/CD70 pathway of activation in immunity and tolerance. J Leukoc Biol89: 195–20320699361
35. Koretzky GA,, Abtahian F,, Silverman MA, (Year: 2006) SLP76 and SLP65: complex regulation of signalling in lymphocytes and beyond. Nat Rev Immunol6: 67–7816493428
36. Qanungo S,, Mukherjea M, (Year: 2000) Ontogenic profile of some antioxidants and lipid peroxidation in human placental and fetal tissues. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry215: 11–1911204445
37. Wang YP,, Walsh SW,, Guo JD,, Zhang JY, (Year: 1991) Maternal Levels of Prostacyclin, Thromboxane, Vitamin-E, and Lipid Peroxides Throughout Normal-Pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology165: 1690–16941750461
38. Vidali M,, Stewart SF,, Albano E, (Year: 2008) Interplay between oxidative stress and immunity in the progression of alcohol-mediated liver injury. Trends in Molecular Medicine14: 63–7118222109
39. Lamb FS,, Hook JS,, Hilkin BM,, Huber JN,, Volk AP,, et al. (Year: 2012) Endotoxin priming of neutrophils requires endocytosis and NADPH oxidase-dependent endosomal reactive oxygen species. J Biol Chem287: 12395–1240422235113
40. Cooke MS,, Evans MD,, Dizdaroglu M,, Lunec J, (Year: 2003) Oxidative DNA damage: mechanisms, mutation, and disease. FASEB J17: 1195–121412832285
41. Collins AR, (Year: 2004) The comet assay for DNA damage and repair: principles, applications, and limitations. Mol Biotechnol26: 249–26115004294
42. Kim TH,, Barrera LO,, Zheng M,, Qu CX,, Singer MA,, et al. (Year: 2005) A high-resolution map of active promoters in the human genome. Nature436: 876–88015988478
43. Chaussabel D,, Pascual V,, Banchereau J, (Year: 2010) Assessing the human immune system through blood transcriptomics. BMC Biol8: 8420619006
44. Pascual V,, Chaussabel D,, Banchereau J, (Year: 2010) A genomic approach to human autoimmune diseases. Annu Rev Immunol28: 535–57120192809
45. Talwar S,, Munson PJ,, Barb J,, Fiuza C,, Cintron AP,, et al. (Year: 2006) Gene expression profiles of peripheral blood leukocytes after endotoxin challenge in humans. Physiol Genomics25: 203–21516403844

Figures

[Figure ID: pone-0046736-g001]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046736.g001.
Figure 1  Effect of choline intake on peripheral blood leukocyte H3K4me2.

The relative abundance of H3K4me2 at study-end in third trimester pregnant women (right) and nonpregnant women (left) consuming 930 versus 480 mg choline/d. White bar: 480 mg choline/d group, black bar: 930 mg choline/d group. n = 10–13/choline intake and pregnancy status. Values are predicted means ± SEM. Analyzed with general linear models.



[Figure ID: pone-0046736-g002]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046736.g002.
Figure 2  Venn diagram of differentially expressed genes by pregnancy.

This figure presents the number of genes differentially expressed in third trimester pregnant versus nonpregnant women at study-baseline (circle on the left) and study-end (circle on the right). The number of genes altered both at study-baseline and study-end are presented in the intersecting area of the two circles. Color scheme: blue represents low expression and yellow represents high expression. n = 12 for pregnant women; n = 10 for nonpregnant women. Analyzed with the LEMMA statistical package.



[Figure ID: pone-0046736-g003]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046736.g003.
Figure 3  Hierarchical clustering of differentially expressed immune defense genes (GO: 0006952) in pregnant versus nonpregnant women.

This figure presents the hierarchical clustering of 112 differentially expressed immune defense genes in third trimester women versus nonpregnant women (reference group) at the beginning and end of the controlled feeding study. Color scheme: blue represents low expression and yellow represents high expression. n = 12 for pregnant women; n = 10 for nonpregnant women. Analyzed with Euclidean distances using MultiExperiment Viewer.



[Figure ID: pone-0046736-g004]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046736.g004.
Figure 4  Plasma TNFα and IL6 concentrations.

Plasma concentrations of TNFα and IL6 in third trimester pregnant versus nonpregnant women at study-baseline (A) and study-end (B). White bar: nonpregnant women (n = 21); black bar: pregnant women (n = 26). Values are means ± SEM. Analyzed with general linear models.



[Figure ID: pone-0046736-g005]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046736.g005.
Figure 5  Peripheral blood leukocyte histone modification marks H3K4me2, H3K9me2 and H3K27me3.

(A) and (C), histone modifications in third trimester pregnant versus nonpregnant women without controlling for percent granulocytes at study-baseline and study-end, respectively; (B) and (D), histone modifications in third trimester pregnant versus nonpregnant women controlling for percent granulocytes at study-baseline or study-end, respectively. White bar: nonpregnant women (n = 21), black bar: pregnant women (n = 26). Data are predicted means ± SEM. Analyzed with general linear models.



Tables
[TableWrap ID: pone-0046736-t001] doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046736.t001.
Table 1  Baseline (study week 0) characteristics of third trimester pregnant women and nonpregnant women randomized to either the 480 or 930 mg/d choline intake group.
Pregnant Nonpregnant
480 mg/d (n = 13) 930 mg/d (n = 13) 480 mg/d (n = 10) 930 mg/d (n = 11)
Age, y (range) 29 (25–33) 28 (22–34) 28 (21–37) 29 (21–40)
Ethnicity, Caucasian/African American/Latino/Asian/Other 9/0/2/1/1 7/1/2/3/0 8/1/1/0/0 6/1/1/1/2
BMI, kg/m2 (range)a 23.6 (20.2–31.9) 23.6 (19.9–29.8) 23.6 (19.6–27.3) 23.5 (18.2–29.8)
Education, high school/college 1/12 3/10 3/7 3/8
Physical activity, usual daily activity/exercise ≥3 times per wk/unknown 5/7/1 1/10/2 2/8/0 1/9/1
Vitamin supplement consumption, yes/nob 11/2 11/2 2/8 5/6

aFor pregnant women, this parameter represents pre-pregnancy BMI.

bP<0.01 between pregnant and nonpregnant women, Chi-square test.


[TableWrap ID: pone-0046736-t002] doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046736.t002.
Table 2  Peripheral blood leukocyte counts in third trimester pregnant women and nonpregnant women at the beginning and end of the controlled feeding study.
Study-baseline Study-end
Pregnant Nonpregnant P value Pregnant Nonpregnant P value
(n = 26) (n = 21) (n = 26) (n = 21)
Leukocytes (×103/µL) 9.8±0.5 6.1±0.2 < 0.01 9.7±0.5 6.3±0.3 < 0.01
Lymphocytes (×103/µL) 1.8±0.1 1.9±0.1 0.30 2.0±0.1 2.1±0.1 0.70
Monocytes (×103/µL) 0.3±0.03 0.2±0.02 < 0.01 0.3±0.02 0.2±0.02 0.09
Granulocytes (×103/µL) 7.7±0.4 4.0±0.2 < 0.01 7.4±0.4 3.9±0.2 < 0.01
Granulocyte (%) 78.2±0.9 65.4±1.4 < 0.01 75.4±0.9 62.5±1.6 < 0.01

Data were analyzed using general linear models.


[TableWrap ID: pone-0046736-t003] doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046736.t003.
Table 3  Quantitative PCR verification of microarray results of genes differentially expressed in third trimester pregnant women (n = 12) and nonpregnant women (n = 10) at the end of the controlled feeding study.
Gene symbol Gene name Function Total transcript abundance Transcript abundance/percent granulocyte Transcript abundance/granulocyte count
Fold change P value Fold change P value Fold change P value
OLFM4 Olfactomedin 4 Cell adhesion 64 <0.01 49 <0.01 32 <0.01
LTF Lactoferrin Host defense 39 <0.01 30 <0.01 23 <0.01
ELANE Elastase Virulence factor degradation 34 <0.01 26 <0.01 18 <0.01
DEFA4 Defensin, alpha 4 Host defense 25 <0.01 20 <0.01 15 <0.01

Data were analyzed with general linear models. Fold change was calculated as the average transcript abundance in pregnant women/the average transcript abundance in nonpregnant women.


[TableWrap ID: pone-0046736-t004] doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046736.t004.
Table 4  Select list of genes involved in defense response that were upregulated in third trimester pregnant women at the end of the controlled feeding study.
Gene symbol Gene name Category Fold change (unadjusted) Fold change (adjusted)
CD14 CD14 molecule Surface marker 2.30 1.77
TLR1 Toll-like receptor 1 TLR signaling pathway 2.16 1.79
TLR4 Toll-like receptor 4 TLR signaling pathway 2.47 1.94
TLR5 Toll-like receptor 5 TLR signaling pathway 3.07 2.43
TLR6 Toll-like receptor 6 TLR signaling pathway 2.51 1.97
MYD88 Myeloid differentiation primary response gene (88) TLR signaling pathway 2.02 1.51
ELANE Elastase, neutrophil expressed Azurophil granule protein 11.05 13.77
MPO Myeloperoxidase Azurophil granule protein 7.25 7.44
AZU1 Azurocidin 1 Azurophil granule protein 2.94 2.93
CTSG Cathepsin G Azurophil granule protein 7.50 7.03
DEFA1 Defensin, alpha 1 Azurophil granule protein 4.76 3.72
DEFA3 Defensin, alpha 3, neutrophil-specific Azurophil granule protein 7.53 4.97
DEFA4 Defensin, alpha 4, corticostatin Azurophil granule protein 26.95 25.81
LTF Lactotransferrin Specific granule protein 35.51 26.33
CAMP Cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide Specific granule protein 17.48 15.59
C1QB Complement component 1, q subcomponent, B Complement system 3.35 2.62
CR1 Complement component (3 b/4 b) receptor 1 Complement system 3.20 2.50
C2 Complement component 2 Complement system 3.58 2.80
IL1B Interleukin 1, beta Cytokine signaling 2.78 2.14
IL1R1 Interleukin 1 receptor, type I Cytokine signaling 2.42 1.77
IL8RB Interleukin 8 receptor, beta Cytokine signaling 2.86 2.23
IL8RA Interleukin 8 receptor, alpha Cytokine signaling 2.81 2.19

P values<0.05 with or without adjusting for leukocyte sub-populations as analyzed with general linear models or the LEMMA statistical package, respectively. Fold change was calculated as the average transcript abundance in pregnant women/the average transcript abundance in nonpregnant women.


[TableWrap ID: pone-0046736-t005] doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046736.t005.
Table 5  Genes involved in adaptive immune response that were downregulated in third trimester pregnant women at the end of the controlled feeding study.
Gene symbol Gene name Function Fold change (unadjusted) Fold change (adjusted)
CD70 CD70 molecule Activated T and B cell marker 0.47 0.61
CD1C CD1c molecule Antigen presentation 0.46 0.63
CD1E CD1e molecule Antigen presentation 0.42 0.55
CCR6 chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 6 T cell recruitment 0.34 0.54
CCR9 chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 9 T cell recruitment 0.50 0.47
BLNK B cell linker B cell receptor signaling 0.38 0.47

P values<0.05 with or without adjusting for leukocyte sub-populations as analyzed with general linear models or the LEMMA statistical package, respectively. Fold change was calculated as the average transcript abundance in pregnant women/the average transcript abundance in nonpregnant women.


[TableWrap ID: pone-0046736-t006] doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046736.t006.
Table 6  Leukocyte DNA damage and global DNA methylation in third trimester pregnant women and nonpregnant women consuming 480 or 930 mg choline/d at the beginning and end of the controlled feeding study.
Pregnant Nonpregnant
480 mg/d 930 mg/d Total 480 mg/d 930 mg/d Total
(n = 13) (n = 13) (n = 26) (n = 10) (n = 11) (n = 21)
Percent tail DNA
Study-beginning 44.9±3.6 43.5±4.8 44.3±2.9* 26.4±2.9 27.8±4.0 27.1±2.5
Study-end 33.2±4.6 43.5±4.8 38.3±3.4* 20.6±1.9 24.9±1.5 22.9±1.6
DNA methylation
Study-beginning 5.1±0.2 5.2±0.2 5.1±0.1 4.9±0.2 5.2±0.2 5.1±0.1
Study-end 5.2±0.2 5.1±0.2 5.1±0.1 5.0±0.1 4.8±0.2 4.9±0.1

Data were analyzed with general linear models.

*P<0.01 between pregnant and nonpregnant women.



Article Categories:
  • Research Article
Article Categories:
  • Biology
    • Genomics
    • Immunology
Article Categories:
  • Medicine
    • Nutrition
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology


Previous Document:  The effect of chance variability in blood pressure readings on the decision making of general practi...
Next Document:  Conformations of islet amyloid polypeptide monomers in a membrane environment: implications for fibr...