Document Detail


Prediction accuracy of computer-assisted surgical visual treatment objectives as compared with conventional visual treatment objectives.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  15883933     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: This present study used the conventional visualized treatment objectives (VTOs) as a tool to evaluate the predictive value of the Dolphin computer-assisted VTOs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Presurgical cephalometric tracing predictions generated by oral and maxillofacial surgeons and the Dolphin Imaging software were compared with the postsurgical outcome as seen on lateral cephalometric tracings. Sixteen measurements of the predicted and actual postsurgical hard tissue landmarks were compared statistically. RESULTS: A paired Student's t test showed that 7 measurements had statistically significant differences for the conventional VTOs (facial angle, P < .0001; AOC, P < .0001; SNB, P = .003; ANB, P = .004; U1-NA-degrees, P = .01; U1-NA-mm, P = .02; and N perp Pog, P < .0001), while 9 measurements were statistically significant ( P = <.0001) for Dolphin (facial angle, P = .0001; AOC, P = .005; SNB, P = .001; ANB, I = .04; U1-NA-degrees, P = .003; PogNB, P = .04; U1-NA-mm, P = .002; N perp Pog, P = .0001; UFH, P = .03; and LFH, P = .03). CONCLUSION: From these data, it appears that both VTOs demonstrated good predictive comparative outcome and are equally precise.
Authors:
Christel Buck Gossett; C Brian Preston; Robert Dunford; Judith Lampasso
Related Documents :
9755763 - Computer assisted knee replacement.
25438733 - Upper airway imaging in pediatric obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.
9188543 - Magnetic resonance imaging of human brain function. principles, practicalities, and pos...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Evaluation Studies; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons     Volume:  63     ISSN:  0278-2391     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.     Publication Date:  2005 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2005-05-10     Completed Date:  2005-05-31     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8206428     Medline TA:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  609-17     Citation Subset:  AIM; D; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Orthodontics, State University of New York School of Dental Medicine, Buffalo, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Adult
Cephalometry / instrumentation*,  methods
Facial Bones / anatomy & histology*
Female
Humans
Jaw / radiography,  surgery*
Male
Middle Aged
Osteotomy, Le Fort / instrumentation*
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Software*
Surgery, Computer-Assisted / instrumentation*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Internal distraction osteogenesis with a unidirectional device for reconstruction of mandibular segm...
Next Document:  Evaluation of taste sensation following tongue reconstruction by microvascular forearm free flap.