Document Detail

Predicting lymph node status in patients with early gastric carcinoma using double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22295029     Owner:  NLM     Status:  PubMed-not-MEDLINE    
INTRODUCTION: Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCUS) is a new method we used in predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with early gastric cancer.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-six patients with early gastric cancer diagnosed by gastroscope and confirmed by pathology after operation were examined using DCUS preoperatively. Group N1 included 15 patients with LNM and group N0 61 patients without LNM.
RESULTS: In group N1, 13 patients (87%) had marked hyperenhancement during early arterial phase using DCUS, and 2 patients (13%) were unmarked as hyperenhancement. In group N0, 24 patients (39%) had marked hyperenhancement during early arterial phase using DCUS, and 37 patients (61%) had unmarked hyperenhancement. The sensitivity and specificity of marked hyperenhancement in predicting LNM in patients with early gastric cancer was 86.7% and 60.7% respectively, and the Youden's index was 0.474. The κ value of this method was 0.89.
CONCLUSIONS: Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is a new valuable method to evaluate LNM at an early stage of gastric cancer and prognosis of early gastric cancer preoperatively.
Nianyu Xue; Pintong Huang; Wilbert S Aronow; Zongmin Wang; Chandra K Nair; Zhiqiang Zheng; Xuedong Shen; Yimei Yin; Fuguang Huang; David Cosgrove
Related Documents :
19089449 - Prevalence of congenital heart defects in neuroblastoma patients: a cohort study and sy...
19481939 - Left ventricular dysfunction and cardiac arrhythmias are frequent in type 2 myotonic dy...
18187379 - Reinsertion predictors of intraaortic balloon pumps.
8269209 - Coronary artery spasm is a major cause of sudden cardiac arrest in survivors without un...
17164489 - Transcatheter closure of ventriculopulmonary artery communications in staged fontan pro...
19800819 - A propensity-matched comparison of the incidence of new-onset postoperative atrial arrh...
12213609 - Neurotrophin-4 and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor in cerebrospinal fluid f...
19954389 - Hyperhomocysteinemia in patients with stasis dermatitis and ulcer: a novel finding with...
9577429 - Sporotrichal arthritis in south central kansas.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2011-07-11
Journal Detail:
Title:  Archives of medical science : AMS     Volume:  7     ISSN:  1896-9151     ISO Abbreviation:  Arch Med Sci     Publication Date:  2011 Jun 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-02-01     Completed Date:  2012-10-02     Revised Date:  2013-05-29    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101258257     Medline TA:  Arch Med Sci     Country:  Poland    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  457-64     Citation Subset:  -    
2 Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Zhejiang, China.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Arch Med Sci
Journal ID (publisher-id): AMS
ISSN: 1734-1922
ISSN: 1896-9151
Publisher: Termedia Publishing House
Article Information
Download PDF
Copyright © 2011 Termedia & Banach
Received Day: 2 Month: 5 Year: 2010
Revision Received Day: 29 Month: 5 Year: 2010
Accepted Day: 31 Month: 5 Year: 2010
Print publication date: Month: 6 Year: 2011
Electronic publication date: Day: 11 Month: 7 Year: 2011
Volume: 7 Issue: 3
First Page: 457 Last Page: 464
ID: 3258739
PubMed Id: 22295029
Publisher Id: AMS-7-3-457
DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2011.23412

Predicting lymph node status in patients with early gastric carcinoma using double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography
Nianyu Xue1
Pintong Huang1
Wilbert S. Aronow2
Zongmin Wang1
Chandra K. Nair3
Zhiqiang Zheng1
Xuedong Shen3
Yimei Yin1
Fuguang Huang1
David Cosgrove4
12nd Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Zhejiang, China
2Cardiology Division, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA
3Cardiac Center of Creighton University, Omaha, NE, USA
4Imaging Sciences Department, Imperial College, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
Correspondence: Corresponding author: Wilbert S. Aronow MD, Cardiology Division, New York Medical College, Macy Pavilion, Room 138, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA, Phone: 914-493-5311, Fax: 914-235-6274. E-mail:


As a result of increased diagnostic accuracy and the wider application of mass surveys, the proportion of early gastric cancer (EGC) among resected gastric cancers has steadily increased, not only in Asia, but also in some Western countries [1-6]. Although the prognosis of EGC is excellent [7-9], EGC with lymph node metastasis (LNM) has a higher possibility of recurrence [10-12]. Because the presence of LNM is the most important prognostic factor for patients with EGC [3, 13-15], radical surgery with extended (D2) lymph node dissection (LND) has become the gold standard treatment for patients with EGC [16-19].

The prevalence of LNM in EGC ranges from 10% to 20% [20-24]. Therefore, at least 80% of patients will undergo unnecessary surgery with D2 lymphadenectomy [8, 25, 26]. Bonenkamp et al. [27] reported that patients with D2 lymph node resection have a higher operative mortality rate with more complications and a longer postoperative hospital stay. Recently, various minimally invasive procedures such as endoscopic mucosal resection and laparoscopic wedge resection without LND have been performed in selected EGC patients to improve the quality of life of long-term survivors [28-35]. For such procedures, the accurate prediction of LNM is crucial to determining the extent of LND.

Although it is extremely useful to know the involvement of lymph nodes before surgery, there is no simple and high sensitivity test to evaluate lymph node status preoperatively. Diagnostic imaging techniques including endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET) and ultrasonography (US) are still unsatisfactory and do not provide enough evidence for an accurate prediction of metastasis in the regional lymph nodes draining gastric cancer because of their low sensitivity [36-41]. It is also difficult to diagnose such nodes during operation [42]. Because direct detection of LNM with high sensitivity is impossible yet, the indirect assessment of LNM in EGC is still based on the pathobiologic behaviors of the tumor [19, 43]. Accurate assessment of the pathobiologic behaviors of the tumor needs resected specimens. Biopsies are too superficial to provide the entire information of the tumor [13].

Conventional trans-abdominal US has been considered unsuitable for the detection of early staging lesions and LNM [44]. Oral contrast agent assisted US has been widely used to detect gastric cancer in China. In the present study, we sought to assess LNM of EGC preoperatively using double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCUS), an oral ultrasonic contrast agent combined with an intravenous contrast agent.

Material and methods

Eighty patients with EGC proven by pathology were examined with DCUS preoperatively between 2005 and 2009 after obtaining written informed consent. Of the 79 patients, 3 were excluded, one with advanced gastric cancer and the other 2 with the number of retrieved lymph nodes less than 15. The remaining 76 patients were enrolled in this study. The mean age of the patients was 58.3 years (range 35-83). The male to female ratio was 1.71 (48/28). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. The ethics committee for our institution approved the study.

In this study, all patients underwent curative gastrectomy with D2 or more extended (D3) lymphadenectomy for primary early GC. Surgical resections were performed within 3 to 5 days after the DCUS examination. None of the patients in this study received nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy before surgery. All of the subjects were divided into 2 groups according to their lymph nodes status postoperatively. Group N1 included 15 patients with LNM. Group N0 included 61 patients without LNM.

Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was performed after fasting for at least 6 h; Atropine sulfate injection (0.05 mg/kg) was administered via intramuscular injection half an hour before the examination to inhibit gastric peristalsis. An Acuson Sequoia 512 system (Siemens, Mountain View, CA), equipped with a 4V1 vector™ transducer (frequency: 1.0~4.0 MHz) and contrast pulse sequencing (CPS) technology with auto-tracking contrast quantification (ACQ) software was used (Phillips and Gardner 2004).

The oral contrast agent Xinzhang® (Huqingyutang, HangZhou, China) was supplied as a microdot powder which was composed of a kind of soya derivative (48 g per package); it was reconstituted by adding 500 ml of boiling water and gently agitating the water by hand to form a homogeneous particulate suspension.

The distal esophagus of all patients was observed dynamically while the patients ingested the oral ultrasonic agent to expand the stomach and evacuate the air in stomach. Hence, the stomach lumen appeared as an iso-echoic homogenous acoustic window. Then the other parts of the stomach and the duodenal bulb were examined in turns with the patient in different body positions. When a suspected lesion was identified, it was measured routinely. If the lesion was smaller than 5 cm, it would be zoomed in for higher spatial resolution. Then after this procedure, a dynamic real-time contrast-enhanced sonography with CPS mode was performed using the following settings: insonating frequency 1.5 MHz and acoustic power, –15 to –21 dB. A low mechanical index (0.20) was selected to minimize microbubble disruption. Images of the ideal scanning plane were displayed in a real-time fashion by slightly changing the scanning plane to portray the whole area of the tumor.

Contrast-enhanced sonographic studies were performed after the administration of 2.4 ml of SonoVue (Bracco SpA, Milan, Italy) as a bolus via a 19-gauge peripheral intravenous cannula. The cannula was flushed with 10 ml saline. A timer on the sonography unit was activated at the beginning of injection, and the entire movie sequence (at least 5 min) was stored on magnetic optical disks for analysis. The contrast study could be repeated a second time if necessary.

The cine loops of the 69 lesions were retrospectively reviewed by 2 independent radiologists who are experts in sonography and microbubble contrast agents. Vascular enhancement of gastric carcinomas was visually classified into 3 patterns: hyper- enhancement, iso-enhancement, and hypo-enhancement. Hyper- enhancement was defined as a signal intensity over the whole tumor higher than the adjacent normal gastric wall during the whole arterial phase. Iso-enhancement was defined as a signal intensity over the whole tumor similar to the adjacent normal gastric wall during the whole arterial phase. Hypo-enhancement was defined as a signal intensity over the whole tumor lower than the adjacent normal gastric wall during the whole arterial phase. According to the pattern of enhancement, all cases were classified into the marked hyperenhancement group and the unmarked hyperenhancement group (including hypoenhancement and isoenhancement). The 2 reviewers were unaware of the definitive diagnosis and other imaging information at the time of the analysis. Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography diagnoses were then compared with the final diagnosis based on the pathologic results.

Lymph nodes were meticulously dissected from the en bloc specimens, and the classification of the dissected lymph nodes was determined by surgeons who reviewed the excised specimens after surgery based on the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma. The primary tumor and retrieved lymph nodes were fixed in 10% formaldehyde solution, embedded in paraffin, incised into 4 mm sections, and mounted on poly-lysine-coated slides. These sections were stained by hematoxylin-and-eosin method to confirm their histological diagnosis and other microscopic characteristics. Experienced pathologists were employed to ensure a high quality of pathological diagnosis. The following clinicopathologic variables were evaluated: sex, age, location of tumor (lower third, middle third, upper third, or entire stomach), tumor diameter, histological type (differentiated: well differentiated, moderately differentiated, or papillary; undifferentiated: poorly differentiated, signet-ring cell, or mucinous), LNM, and depth of invasion (mucosa or submucosa).

Sensitivity, specificity and Youden’s index were calculated for both oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and DCUS. Statistical evaluation was performed using the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test to differentiate the rates among the different groups. Student’s t-test was used to analyze quantitative data. Kappa statistics was used to show the level of correlation in agreement between the 2 reviewers. Kappa values are categorized as follows [45]. Values between –1 and 0 indicate "no agreement"; between 0 and 0.20 indicate "poor agreement"; between 0.21 and 0.40 indicate "slight agreement"; between 0.41 and 0.60 indicate "fair agreement"; between 0.61 and 0.80 indicate "good agreement"; between 0.81 and 0.90 indicate "very good agreement"; and between 0.91 and 1.0 indicate "excellent agreement". For all analyses, a p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All data were analyzed using SPSS13.0 statistical software (Chicago, IL, United States).


A total of 76 patients who had undergone gastrectomy with D2 or more extended (D3) lymphadenectomy for EGC at the 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College were studied. The number of retrieved lymph nodes in all patients was more than 15, ranging from 15 to 63 (median, 29.9). Lymph node metastasis was detected in 15 patients (19.7%), and the number of metastatic lymph nodes ranged from 1 to 36 (median 6.9).

In group N1, 13 patients (87%) had marked hyperenhancement compared with the adjacent normal gastric wall during the early arterial phase by using DCUS (Figure 1 C), and the other 2 patients (13%) had unmarked hyperenhancement. However, in group N0, 24 patients (39%) had marked early hyperenhancement compared to the adjacent normal gastric wall during the arterial phase using DCUS, and the other 37 patients had unmarked hyperenhancement (Figure 2 C). The sensitivity and specificity of marked hyperenhancement in predicting LNM in patients with early gastric cancer were 86.7% and 60.7%, respectively, and the Youden’s index was 0.474 (Table I). The relationships between pathological characteristics of patients and the type of contrast enhancement are summarized in Table II.


Since LNM remains one of the most important predictors for survival, reduction in lymphadenectomy will probably result in a residue of metastatic lymph nodes [19]. Unnecessarily extended resection will induce a series of complications, which also result in a poor quality of life [10, 46, 47]. Thus, it is important to standardize the optimal extent of LND by investigating LNM of EGC preoperatively.

The low sensitivities of EUS, CT, US and PET are insufficient to allow decision making on the extent of lymphadenectomy [37-40]. Endoscopic ultrasound, MR and CT mainly depend on lymph node size as criteria to define malignancy [48]. Lymph nodes of less than 5 mm in diameter cannot be accurately detected by available imaging techniques [49-51]. In one study, 55% of the metastatic lymph nodes were 5 mm or less in diameter [52]. The lack of correlation between lymph node size and metastatic infiltration has been reported in studies of other solid tumors [53-57]. Therefore, differentiating between benign and metastatic lymph nodes may be unreliable when lymph node size is used as a criterion [52]. Lymph node metastasis of EGC is still predicted by means of the presence or absence of certain tumor characteristics postoperatively [19, 43, 58].

It is very difficult for conventional transabdominal US to visualize the gastric cancer without any assistant because of the interference of gas in the stomach (Figures 1 A, 2 A). Although the likelihood of detecting gastric cancer followed by oral contrast agent exist (Figures 1 B, 2 B), the sensitivity of diagnosis of LNM of EGC by oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is still very low (Figure 1 B), with a rate of 33.3% in our study.

Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography could be considered as a valid method to evaluate the microcirculatory perfusion of gastric cancer using intravenous contrast agents, based on taking an oral ultrasonic agent. An oral ultrasonic agent which was composed by a kind of soya derivative has some contribution for this study, such as the how to evacuate the air in stomach and distend the gastric lumen for displaying the lesions prominently. After taking the oral contrast agent, the stomach lumen appeared as an iso-echoic homogenous acoustic window, and its effect was superior to water because the evacuation was slow. SonoVue, a microbubble contrast material with a mean diameter of 2.5 µm, is a blood pool agent that does not cross into the interstitial space [59, 60].

Because such microbubbles flow with red blood cells, the injected microbubbles act as markers for tissues that are densely populated with vessels, thereby, suggesting that angiogenesis is the foundation for tumor enhancement [61, 62]. Angiogenesis is important for tumor growth and metastasis [63-65]. Angiogenesis is an unfavorable factor related to LNM in EG [66]. Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography can be used to assess vascularity and the biological behavior of gastric carcinomas in vivo [67].

Because of this finding, we sought to predict the LNM in EGC preoperatively using DCUS by means of certain primary tumor characteristics. Although the specificity decreased from 98.4% with oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography to 60.7% with DCUS (p < 0.005), the sensitivity was improved from 33.3% with oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography to 86.7% with DCUS (p < 0.005). Because the presence of LNM has a strong adverse influence on the prognosis of patients with EGC [11, 22, 68-70], the high sensitivity of diagnosis is more important. The agreement of this diagnosis is very good (κ value = 0.89).

Intratumor microvessel density (MVD) is a reliable index of tumor angiogenesis [71]. Many previous studies of gastric carcinoma have demonstrated that angiogenesis is one of the crucial factors for tumor development and progression in gastric cancer [72, 73]. Angiogenesis is closely correlated with biological behaviors, degree of differentiation, and metastatic lymphadenopathy in gastric cancer [74]. Contrast-enhanced intensity has a strong positive linear correlation with MVD in gastric carcinoma [67]. Therefore, contrast-enhanced intensity is a promising index to evaluate the growth and progression of gastric carcinoma. This study demonstrates that depth of tumor size and degree of differentiation both relate to contrast-enhanced intensity (p < 0.05), which indicates that contrast-enhanced intensity can be used to assess the biological behavior of EGC in vivo. We found that degree of differentiation was significantly associated with LNM (p < 0.05), similar to that indicated by other authors [18, 19, 75].

Although contrast enhanced ultrasonography can assess whether LNM is present in the patients with DCUS, the location and number of lymph nodes cannot be determined. Further studies are required to evaluate LNM with precise quantitative analysis.

In conclusion, DCUS shows promise as a new noninvasive, convenient, and repeatable method to evaluate LNM in EGC and the prognosis of EGC preoperatively. Identification of EGC with marked hyperenhancement allows closer postoperative follow-up and possibly the use of drugs targeted for the growth of new vessels to prevent recurrence.


This study was supported by grants from Science and Technology Bureau of Wenzhou, Zhejiang province, China, Foreign Cooperation Foundation (H20060039). We thank all the surgeons, pathologists and the technicians at the 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College.

1. Gentsch HH,Groitl H,Giedl J. Results of surgical treatment of early gastric cancer in 113 patientsWorld J SurgYear: 1981510377233947
2. Green PH,O’Toole KM,Weinberg LM,Goldfarb JP. Early gastric cancerGastroenterologyYear: 198181247567239133
3. Hochwald SN,Brennan MF,Klimstra DS,Kim S,Karpeh MS. Is lymphadenectomy necessary for early gastric cancer?Ann Surg OncolYear: 199966647010560852
4. Machado G,Davies JD,Tudway AJ,et al. Superficial carcinoma of the stomachBr Med JYear: 197627791276819
5. Maehara Y,Kakeji Y,Oda S,Takahashi I,Akazawa K,Sugimachi K. Time trends of surgical treatment and the prognosis for Japanese patients with gastric cancerBr J CancerYear: 2000839869110993643
6. Sue-Ling HM,Martin I,Griffith J,et al. Early gastric cancer 46 cases treated in one surgical departmentGutYear: 1992331318221446852
7. Ikeda Y,Saku M,Kawanaka H,et al. Prophylactic lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer invading submucosaHepatogastroenterologyYear: 2004518879015143940
8. Roviello F,Rossi S,Marrelli D,et al. Number of lymph node metastases and its prognostic significance in early gastric cancer a multicenter Italian studyJ Surg OncolYear: 2006942758016917863
9. Shan J,Chen J,Wang S. Recurrence of early gastric cancerZhonghua Yi Xue Za ZhiYear: 19967675029275516
10. Borie F,Plaisant N,Millat B,Hay JM,Fagniez PL. Appropriate gastric resection with lymph node dissection for early gastric cancerAnn Surg OncolYear: 200411512715078634
11. Sano T,Sasako M,Kinoshita T,Maruyama K. Recurrence of early gastric cancer. Follow-up of 1475 patients and review of the Japanese literatureCancerYear: 199372317488242540
12. Yasuda K,Adachi Y,Shiraishi N,Inomata M,Takeuchi H,Kitano S. Prognostic effect of lymph node micrometastasis in patients with histologically node-negative gastric cancerAnn Surg OncolYear: 20029771412374660
13. Gotoda T,Yanagisawa A,Sasako M,et al. Incidence of lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: estimation with a large number of cases at two large centersGastric CancerYear: 200032192511984739
14. Jentschura D,Heubner C,Manegold BC,Rumstadt B,Winkler M,Trede M. Surgery for early gastric cancer a European one-center experienceWorld J SurgYear: 19972184589327676
15. Roder JD,Bottcher K,Busch R,Wittekind C,Hermanek D,Siewert JR. Classification of regional lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma. German Gastric Cancer Study GroupCancerYear: 199882621319477092
16. Isozaki H,Tanaka N,Okajima K. General and specific prognostic factors of early gastric carcinoma treated with curative surgeryHepatogastroenterologyYear: 1999461800810430349
17. kamura T,Tsujitani S,Korenaga D,et al. Lymphadenectomy for cure in patients with early gastric cancer and lymph node metastasisAm J SurgYear: 1988155476803344913
18. Shen L,Huang Y,Sun M,Xu H,Wei W,Wu W. Clinicopathological features associated with lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer analysis of a single-institution experience in ChinaCan J GastroenterolYear: 200923353619440566
19. Xu YY,Huang BJ,Sun Z,Lu C,Liu YP. Risk factors for lymph node metastasis and evaluation of reasonable surgery for early gastric cancerWorld J GastroenterolYear: 2007135133817876881
20. Guadagni S,Reed PI,Johnston BJ,et al. Early gastric cancer followup after gastrectomy in 159 patientsBr J SurgYear: 19938032588472141
21. Hanazaki K,Wakabayashi M,Sodeyama H,et al. Surgical outcome in early gastric cancer with lymph node metastasisHepatogastroenterologyYear: 199744907119222713
22. Kim JP,Hur YS,Yang HK. Lymph node metastasis as a significant prognostic factor in early gastric cancer analysis of 1 136 early gastric cancersAnn Surg OncolYear: 19952308137552619
23. Maehara Y,Okuyama T,Oshiro T,et al. Early carcinoma of the stomachSurg Gynecol ObstetYear: 199317759378266270
24. Ranaldi R,Santinelli A,Verdolini R,Rezai B,Mannello B,Bearzi I. Long-term follow-up in early gastric cancer evaluation of prognostic factorsJ PatholYear: 1995177343518568588
25. Hyung WJ,Cheong JH,Kim J,Chen J,Choi SH,Noh SH. Application of minimally invasive treatment for early gastric cancerJ Surg OncolYear: 200485181514991872
26. Yoshikawa T,Tsuburaya A,Kobayashi O,Sairenji M,Motohashi H,Noguchi Y. Indications of limited surgery for gastric cancer with submucosal invasion analysis of 715 cases with special reference to site of the tumor and level 2 lymph nodesHepatogastroenterologyYear: 20035017273014571828
27. Brennan MF. Current status of surgery for gastric cancer a reviewGastric CancerYear: 20058647015864711
28. Abe N,Mori T,Takeuchi H,et al. Laparoscopic lymph node dissection after endoscopic submucosal dissection a novel and minimally invasive approach to treating early-stage gastric cancerAm J SurgYear: 200519049650316105543
29. Chavez Rossell M. Endoscopic treatment of early gastric cancer: from endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) to endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)Rev Gastroenterol PeruYear: 200525769215818423
30. Gotoda T. A large endoscopic resection by endoscopic submucosal dissection procedure for early gastric cancerClin Gastroenterol HepatolYear: 20053S71316013003
31. Gotoda T,Yamamoto H,Soetikno RM. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancerJ GastroenterolYear: 2006419294217096062
32. Hirasaki S,Tanimizu M,Nasu J,Shinji T,Koide N. Treatment of elderly patients with early gastric cancer by endoscopic submucosal dissection using an insulated-tip diathermic knifeIntern MedYear: 2005441033816293912
33. Ishikawa S,Togashi A,Inoue M,et al. Indications for EMR/ESD in cases of early gastric cancer: relationship between histological type depth of wall invasion and lymph node metastasisGastric CancerYear: 20071035817334716
34. Kato M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is being accepted as a new procedure of endoscopic treatment of early gastric cancerIntern MedYear: 20054485615750264
35. Ono H. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancerChin J Dig DisYear: 200561192116045601
36. Akahoshi K,Chijiiwa Y,Hamada S,et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography a promising method for assessing the prospects of endoscopic mucosal resection in early gastric cancerEndoscopyYear: 19972961499360870
37. Halpert RD,Feczko PJ. Role of radiology in the diagnosis and staging of gastric malignancyEndoscopyYear: 19932539458453925
38. Neumaier CE,Cittadini G,Grasso A,Dahmane M. Role of ultrasonography in the staging of gastrointestinal neoplasmsSemin Surg OncolYear: 200120869011398202
39. Polkowski M,Palucki J,Wronska E,Szawlowski A,Nasierowska-Guttmejer A,Butruk E. Endosonography versus helical computed tomography for locoregional staging of gastric cancerEndoscopyYear: 2004366172315243885
40. Tsendsuren T,Jun SM,Mian XH. Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography in preoperative TNM staging of gastric cancerWorld J GastroenterolYear: 20061243716440415
41. Yun M,Lim JS,Noh SH,et al. Lymph node staging of gastric cancer using (18)F-FDG PET a comparison study with CTJ Nucl MedYear: 2005461582816204706
42. Noguchi Y,Imada T,Matsumoto A,Coit DG,Brennan MF. Radical surgery for gastric cancer. A review of the Japanese experienceCancerYear: 1989642053622680049
43. Li C,Kim S,Lai JF,et al. Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in undifferentiated early gastric cancerAnn Surg OncolYear: 200815764918043971
44. Nuernberg D,Ignee A,Dietrich CF. Current status of ultrasound in gastroenterology bowel and upper gastrointestinal tract – part 1Z GastroenterolYear: 2007456294017599290
45. Byrt T,Bishop J,Carlin JB. Bias prevalence and kappaJ Clin EpidemiolYear: 19934642398501467
46. Cuschieri A,Fayers P,Fielding J,et al. The Surgical Cooperative GroupPostoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trialLancetYear: 199634799598606613
47. Wanebo HJ,Kennedy BJ,Winchester DP,Fremgen A,Stewart AK. Gastric carcinoma does lymph node dissection alter survival?J Am Coll SurgYear: 1996183616248957465
48. Fukuya T,Honda H,Hayashi T,et al. Lymph-node metastases efficacy for detection with helical CT in patients with gastric cancerRadiologyYear: 1995197705117480743
49. Baba H,Maehara Y,Okuyama T,et al. Lymph node metastasis and macroscopic features in early gastric cancerHepatogastroenterologyYear: 19944138037959576
50. Kurihara N,Kubota T,Otani Y,et al. Lymph node metastasis of early gastric cancer with submucosal invasionBr J SurgYear: 19988583599667719
51. Nakahara K,Tsuruta O,Tateishi H,et al. Extended indication criteria for endoscopic mucosal resection of early gastric cancer with special reference to lymph node metastasis – examination by multivariate analysisKurume Med JYear: 20045191415150895
52. Monig SP,Zirbes TK,Schroder W,et al. Staging of gastric cancer: correlation of lymph node size and metastatic infiltrationAJR Am J RoentgenolYear: 1999173365710430138
53. Dworak O. Number and size of lymph nodes and node metastases in rectal carcinomasSurg EndoscYear: 198939692672395
54. Herrera-Ornelas L,Justiniano J,Castillo N,et al. Metastases in small lymph nodes from colon cancerArch SurgYear: 1987122125363675188
55. Kerr KM,Lamb D,Wathen CG,Walker WS,Douglas NJ. Pathological assessment of mediastinal lymph nodes in lung cancer: implications for non-invasive mediastinal stagingThoraxYear: 199247337411609375
56. Kotanagi H,Fukuoka T,Shibata Y,et al. The size of regional lymph nodes does not correlate with the presence or absence of metastasis in lymph nodes in rectal cancerJ Surg OncolYear: 19935425248255087
57. Okuda I,Kokubo T,Udagawa H,et al. Mediastinal lymph node metastasis from esophageal carcinoma CT assessment with pathologic correlationNippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai ZasshiYear: 19975739149232987
58. Kwee RM,Kwee TC. Predicting lymph node status in early gastric cancerGastric CancerYear: 2008111344818825308
59. Schneider M. SonoVue a new ultrasound contrast agentEur RadiolYear: 19999Suppl 3S347810602926
60. Schneider M,Arditi M,Barrau MB,et al. BR1 a new ultrasonographic contrast agent based on sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubblesInvest RadiolYear: 19953045178557510
61. Brasch RC,Weinmann HJ,Wesbey GE. Contrast-enhanced NMR imaging animal studies using gadolinium-DTPA complexAJR Am J RoentgenolYear: 1984142625306607656
62. Strich G,Hagan PL,Gerber KH,Slutsky RA. Tissue distribution and magnetic resonance spin lattice relaxation effects of gadolinium-DTPARadiologyYear: 198515472363969477
63. Folkman J. What is the evidence that tumors are angiogenesis dependent?J Natl Cancer InstYear: 199082461688381
64. Folkman J,Watson K,Ingber D,Hanahan D. Induction of angiogenesis during the transition from hyperplasia to neoplasiaNatureYear: 198933958612469964
65. Song ZJ,Gong P,Wu YE. Relationship between the expression of iNOS VEGF tumor angiogenesis and gastric cancerWorld J GastroenterolYear: 20028591512174362
66. Xiangming C,Hokita S,Natsugoe S,et al. Angiogenesis as an unfavorable factor related to lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancerAnn Surg OncolYear: 1998558599831105
67. Shiyan L,Pintong H,Zongmin W,et al. The relationship between enhanced intensity and microvessel density of gastric carcinoma using double contrast-enhanced ultrasonographyUltrasound Med BiolYear: 20093510869119419811
68. Park DJ,Lee HK,Lee HJ,et al. Lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer with submucosal invasion feasibility of minimally invasive surgeryWorld J GastroenterolYear: 20041035495215534904
69. Shiu MH,Moore E,Sanders M,et al. Influence of the extent of resection on survival after curative treatment of gastric carcinoma. A retrospective multivariate analysisArch SurgYear: 19871221347513675199
70. Tanaka M,Ono H,Hasuike N,Takizawa K. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancerDigestionYear: 200877Suppl 123818204258
71. Fukumura D,Jain RK. Role of nitric oxide in angiogenesis and microcirculation in tumorsCancer Metastasis RevYear: 19981777899544424
72. Carmeliet P,Jain RK. Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseasesNatureYear: 20004072495711001068
73. Liekens S,De Clercq E,Neyts J. Angiogenesis: regulators and clinical applicationsBiochem PharmacolYear: 2001612537011172729
74. Nakajima Y,Gotanda T,Uchimiya H,et al. Inhibition of metastasis of tumor cells overexpressing thymidine phosphorylase by 2-deoxy-L-riboseCancer ResYear: 200464179480114996742
75. Gotoda T,Sasako M,Ono H,Katai H,Sano T,Shimoda T. Evaluation of the necessity for gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for patients with submucosal invasive gastric cancerBr J SurgYear: 200188444911260114

Article Categories:
  • Clinical Research

Keywords: early gastric cancer, lymph node metastasis, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

Previous Document:  Relationship between B-type natriuretic peptide serum level, echocardiographic TEI index and the deg...
Next Document:  Evaluation of the neuroprotective effect of dextromethorphan in the acute phase of ischaemic stroke.