Document Detail


Practice nurses and obesity: professional and practice-based factors affecting role adequacy and role legitimacy.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22464138     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
AimThis qualitative study explored the professional and practice-based factors affecting the role legitimacy and adequacy of practice nurses in managing obese patients. BACKGROUND: There are strong clinical, financial and practical reasons for tackling obesity in UK general practice. Although practice nurses may seem to be in an ideal position to manage obesity, there remain questions about their role adequacy (sense of self-efficacy in responding to patients' problems) and role legitimacy (their perceived boundaries of professional responsibility and right to intervene). METHODS: Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted with 22 practice nurses in Lambeth, Southwark and Lewisham in South London. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed. Key themes were identified following coding of the data.FindingsFactors that positively affected nurses' role adequacy and legitimacy were: their belief that obesity management was part of their chronic disease management and health promotion remit; their confidence in their own communication skills and ability to build rapport with patients; having attended training and being supported to take extra time for obesity management. Factors negatively affecting their role legitimacy and adequacy were: their low awareness and use of guidance; lack of knowledge of referral options; limited knowledge and use of non-medical and non-persuasive approaches; perceived lack of expertise in motivating patients, as well as in nutrition, child obesity and assessment; belief that there were some contexts in which it was more appropriate to raise the issue than others; lack of culturally appropriate materials and language barriers; belief that they had limited impact on outcome and that the patient is responsible for lack of success. Other factors negatively affecting their role adequacy and legitimacy included their ambivalence about the effectiveness of the interventions offered; perceived lack of priority for obesity management within practices; lack of time; workload and lack of clarity on protocols and roles within the practice.
Authors:
Christine Nolan; Ann Deehan; Ann Wylie; Roger Jones
Related Documents :
15285868 - Retropharyngeal space swelling secondary to minor blunt head and neck trauma.
20705248 - Concussion in the adolescent athlete.
8730378 - Management of missile wounds of the maxillofacial region during the 20th century.
20956918 - Dysphagia in severe traumatic brain injury.
21166878 - Electrolyte management in frequent home hemodialysis.
23286188 - Medicine, 1450-1620, and the history of science.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2012-4-2
Journal Detail:
Title:  Primary health care research & development     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1477-1128     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2012 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-4-2     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100897390     Medline TA:  Prim Health Care Res Dev     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  1-11     Citation Subset:  -    
Affiliation:
1Honorary Research Fellow, Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Kings College London, UK.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Prevalence of aphysiologic performance on dynamic posturography in work-related patients.
Next Document:  Prostaglandins and chronic inflammation.