Document Detail


A practical approach to monitoring recovery: development of a perceived recovery status scale.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20581704     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Laurent, CM, Green, JM, Bishop, PA, Sjökvist, J, Schumacker, RE, Richardson, MT, and Curtner-Smith, M. A practical approach to monitoring recovery: development of a perceived recovery status scale. J Strength Cond Res 25(3): 620-628, 2011-The aim of this study was to develop and test the practical utility of a perceived recovery status (PRS) scale. Sixteen volunteers (8 men, 8 women) performed 4 bouts of high-intensity intermittent sprint exercise. After completion of the baseline trial, in a repeated-measures design, subjects were given variable counterbalanced recovery periods of 24, 48, and 72 hours whereupon they repeated an identical intermittent exercise protocol. After a warm-up period, but before beginning each subsequent bout of intermittent sprinting, each individual provided their perceived level of recovery with a newly developed PRS scale. Similar to perceived exertion during exercise, PRS was based on subjective feelings. The utility of the PRS scale was assessed by measuring the level of agreement of an individual's perceived recovery relative to their performance during the exercise bout. Perceived recovery status and change (both positive and negative) in sprint performance during multiple bouts of repeated sprint exercise were moderately negative correlated (r = -0.63). Additionally, subjects were able to accurately assess level of recovery using the PRS scale indicated by correspondence with negative and positive changes in total sprint time relative to their previous session. The ability to detect changes in performance using a noninvasive psychobiological tool to identify differences in performance was independent of other psychological and physiological markers measured during testing, because there were no differences (p > 0.05) among ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), heart rate, blood lactate concentration, or session RPE values among any of the performance trials. Although further study is needed, current results indicate a subjective approach may be an effective means for assessing recovery from day to day, at least under similar conditions.
Authors:
C Matthew Laurent; J Matt Green; Phillip A Bishop; Jesper Sjökvist; Randall E Schumacker; Mark T Richardson; Matt Curtner-Smith
Related Documents :
18523754 - Use of non-invasive nirs during a vascular occlusion test to assess dynamic tissue o(2)...
1748104 - The validation of backward extrapolation of submaximal oxygen consumption from the oxyg...
18166504 - Independence of exercise-induced diaphragmatic fatigue from ventilatory demands.
23382404 - Physicians' health habits are associated with lifestyle counseling for hypertensive pat...
10659274 - Muscular and metabolic responses to moderate-intensity short-term training.
17670464 - Atrial septal defect in adults: echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise capacity ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of strength and conditioning research / National Strength & Conditioning Association     Volume:  25     ISSN:  1533-4287     ISO Abbreviation:  J Strength Cond Res     Publication Date:  2011 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-02-17     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9415084     Medline TA:  J Strength Cond Res     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  620-8     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
1Department of Kinesiology, St. Ambrose University, Davenport, Iowa; 2Department of Health, Physical Education, and Recreation, University of North Alabama, Florence, Alabama; 3Department of Kinesiology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama; 4Winter Research Sports Center, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden; and 5Department of Educational Research, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  A comparison of traditional and weekly undulating periodized strength training programs with total v...
Next Document:  Precision in the prediction of middle distance-running performances using either a nomogram or the m...