Document Detail

Postoperative issues of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence and constipation: a systematic literature review and treatment guideline.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21979192     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
BACKGROUND: : There is a lack of knowledge on the incidence and management of suboptimal therapeutic effect and the complications associated with sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence and constipation.
OBJECTIVE: : This study aimed to review current literature on postoperative issues and to propose a treatment algorithm.
DATA SOURCE: : PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were searched using the keywords "sacral nerve stimulation," "sacral neuromodulation," "fecal incontinence," and "constipation" for English-language articles published from January 1980 to August 2010. A further search was conducted on a wider literature using the keywords "complication," "adverse effect," "treatment failure," "equipment failure," "infection," "foreign-body migration," "reoperation," "pain," and "algorithm."
STUDY SELECTION: : Four hundred sixty-one titles were identified, and after a title and abstract review, 135 were subjected to full article review; 89 were finally included in this review. Five articles were added by manual search and consensus.
RESULTS: : Forty-eight studies were identified as cohort studies reporting on postoperative issues, including 1661 patients who underwent percutaneous nerve evaluation and 1600 patients who proceeded to sacral nerve stimulation therapy. Pooled data showed that the most common problem during percutaneous nerve evaluation was lead displacement (5.3%). The incidence of suboptimal outcome, pain, and infection after implantation was 12.1%, 13.0%, and 3.9%.
LIMITATIONS: : There was significant underreporting of untoward events, because 60% of the studies did not report complications during percutaneous nerve evaluation, and suboptimal outcome after implantation was not disclosed in 44% of the studies.
CONCLUSIONS: : The incidence of untoward events associated with sacral nerve stimulation appears to be low. However, there is a significant underreporting of the incidence. Using the information from the structured and systematic literature review, we formulated a clinically relevant guideline for reporting and managing postoperative issues. The guideline can provide a framework for clinical practice.
Yasuko Maeda; Klaus Matzel; Lilli Lundby; Steen Buntzen; Søren Laurberg
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Diseases of the colon and rectum     Volume:  54     ISSN:  1530-0358     ISO Abbreviation:  Dis. Colon Rectum     Publication Date:  2011 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-10-07     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0372764     Medline TA:  Dis Colon Rectum     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1443-60     Citation Subset:  IM    
1 Sir Alan Parks Physiology Unit, St. Mark's Hospital, Harrow, United Kingdom 2 Department of Surgery, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany 3 Surgical Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Reoperation after colorectal surgery is an independent predictor of the 1-year mortality rate.
Next Document:  Fine-needle aspiration cytology of adrenal masses: a re-assessment with histological confirmation.