Document Detail


Post-radical prostatectomy pharmacological penile rehabilitation: practice patterns among the international society for sexual medicine practitioners.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19453918     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Process    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
INTRODUCTION: Despite the fact that there is minimal evidence-based data supporting it, the concept of pharmacological penile rehabilitation following radical prostatectomy (RP) is receiving great attention. AIM: To define attitudes and practice patterns of clinicians who were members of the International Society for Sexual Medicine (ISSM) and/or its affiliated societies. METHODS: Members of the ISSM and its regional affiliates were invited to participate in a web-based survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic factors, current practice status, and opinions regarding post-RP erectile dysfunction and penile rehabilitation. The statistical methods used included chi-square, Student's t-tests, and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Three hundred-one physicians from 41 countries completed the questionnaire (82% were urologists). Sixty-five percent of the responders had formal sexual medicine specialty training, 44% had uro-oncology specialty training, and 60% performed RPs. Eighty-seven percent performed some form of rehabilitation. As part of the primary rehabilitation strategy, 95% used phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5), 30% used vacuum device, 75% used intracavernosal injections, and 9.9% used intraurethral prostaglandin. Fifty-four percent commenced rehabilitation immediately/just after urethral catheter removal, and 37% within the first 4 months after RP. Neither the number of years in medical practice, clinician age, nor country/region of practice differed between rehabilitation performers and non-performers. With regard to the primary reason for avoiding rehabilitation: 50% responded said it is the cost; 25% said the fact that it is not evidence-based; and 25% said they were not familiar with the concept. Performing rehabilitation was positively associated with urologic oncology training (P = 0.03), performing RP (P < 0.001), and seeing over 50 post-RP patients per year (P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Among ISSM members post-RP penile rehabilitation is widely practiced, commenced early, and based predominantly on PDE5 inhibitors and intracavernosal injections. Clinicians who perform RP or see over 50 such patients per year are the most likely to perform rehabilitation. Cost represents the most common reason for rehabilitation neglect.
Authors:
Patrick Teloken; Guilherme Mesquita; Francesco Montorsi; John Mulhall
Related Documents :
20825918 - Diagnostic nuclear medicine in the ed.
9115068 - Design and implementation of a nuclear cardiology testing facility in a private-practic...
16500188 - Limb deficiency and prosthetic management. 2. aging with limb loss.
7805108 - Achilles tendon disorders.
6957458 - New dental graduates: mobility and choice of dental practice arrangement. bureau of eco...
10116648 - Information systems management under pressure.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2009-04-23
Journal Detail:
Title:  The journal of sexual medicine     Volume:  6     ISSN:  1743-6109     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2009 Jul 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2009-07-06     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101230693     Medline TA:  J Sex Med     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  2032-8     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil. patrickteloken@gmail.com
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Men's Sexual Health: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Print- and PDA-based CME.
Next Document:  Depression resulting from olfactory dysfunction is associated with reduced sexual appetite--a cross-...