| Post-endovascular aneurysm repair patient outcomes and follow-up are not adversely impacted by long travel distance to tertiary vascular surgery centers. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 21035700 Owner: NLM Status: In-Process |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
BACKGROUND: To determine whether patient adherence to follow-up and patient outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) are affected by the distance between a patient's residence and a tertiary care treatment center. METHODS: A retrospective review of 136 consecutive patients undergoing EVAR at the New Mexico Veterans Affairs Medical Center over a 7-year period was conducted. Patients were stratified as living within a 100-mi radius of the treatment center (group 1) and those living outside this radius (group 2). Follow-up included clinic visits and computed tomography scans at 1 month after discharge, every 6 months for 2 years, and then yearly. Incomplete follow-up was defined if two or more consecutive appointments were missed. Survival and graft-related complication rates were analyzed for both the patient groups. RESULTS: Of the 136 patients, 10 patients died from nonaneurysm-related causes less than 1 year after their EVAR procedures, and hence were not a part of the study. Of the surviving patients, 44% lived within a 100-mi radius of the treatment center (group 1), and 56% outside this 100-mi radius (group 2). The mean patient follow-up time was 52.1 ± 25.9 months. Of the surviving patients, 15% had inadequate follow-up, yet there was no significant difference in the adequacy of follow-up for patients in group 1 compared with group 2. The incidence of major complications, defined as aneurysm rupture, conversion to open repair, myocardial infarction, and stroke, was not statistically different in group 1 versus group 2 (5.0% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.23). Of the five patients (3.7%) who died as a result of abdominal aortic aneurysms related causes, three were in group 1 and two in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Distance from a tertiary care center is not a limiting factor in patient adherence to follow-up, patient graft-related morbidity, or patient survival, likely because of the Albuquerque VA Medical Center's electronic tracking of patients and provision of travel vouchers. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Dusadee Sarangarm; Jordan Knepper; John Marek; Kristen L Biggs; Diane Robertson; Mark Langsfeld |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Annals of vascular surgery Volume: 24 ISSN: 1615-5947 ISO Abbreviation: Ann Vasc Surg Publication Date: 2010 Nov |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2010-11-01 Completed Date: - Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 8703941 Medline TA: Ann Vasc Surg Country: United States |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 1075-81 Citation Subset: IM |
Copyright Information:
|
Copyright © 2010 Annals of Vascular Surgery Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
Affiliation:
|
Division of Vascular Surgery, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001, USA. |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
|
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Open surgical repair and endovascular treatment in adult coarctation of the aorta.
Next Document: Results of single- and two-vessel mesenteric artery stents for chronic mesenteric ischemia.