Document Detail


Positioning for acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22786486     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Because of the association of prone positioning with sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) it is recommended that young infants be placed on their backs (supine). However, the prone position may be a non-invasive way of increasing oxygenation in participants with acute respiratory distress. Because of substantial differences in respiratory mechanics between adults and children and the risk of SIDS in young infants, a specific review of positioning for infants and young children with acute respiratory distress is warranted.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of different body positions in hospitalised infants and children with acute respiratory distress.
SEARCH METHODS: We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2012, Issue 3), which contains the Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialised Register, MEDLINE (1966 to April week 1, 2012), EMBASE (2004 to April 2012) and CINAHL (2004 to April 2012).
SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or pseudo-RCTs comparing two or more positions in the management of infants and children hospitalised with acute respiratory distress.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data from each study. We resolved differences by consensus or referral to a third review author. We analysed bivariate outcomes using an odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI). We analysed continuous outcomes using a mean difference and 95% CI. We used a fixed-effect model unless heterogeneity was significant, in which case we used a random-effects model.
MAIN RESULTS: We extracted data from 53 studies. We included 24 studies with a total of 581 participants. Three studies used a parallel-group, randomised design which compared prone and supine positions only. The remaining 21 studies used a randomised cross-over design. These studies compared prone, supine, lateral, elevated and flat positions.Prone positioning was significantly more beneficial than supine positioning in terms of oxygen saturation (mean difference (MD) 1.97%, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.77), arterial oxygen (MD 6.24 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.20 to 10.28), episodes of hypoxaemia (MD -3.46, 95% CI -4.60 to -2.33) and thoracoabdominal synchrony (MD -30.76, 95% CI -41.39 to -20.14). No adverse effects were identified. There were no statistically significant differences between any other positions.As the majority of studies did not describe how possible biases were addressed, the potential for bias in these findings is unclear.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The prone position was significantly superior to the supine position in terms of oxygenation. However, as most participants were ventilated preterm infants, the benefits of prone positioning may be most relevant to these infants. In addition, although placing infants and children in the prone position may improve respiratory function, the association of SIDS with prone positioning means that infants should only be placed in this position while under continuous cardiorespiratory monitoring.
Authors:
Donna Gillies; Deborah Wells; Abhishta P Bhandari
Related Documents :
2364586 - Intracardiac fibroma in an asymptomatic infant.
21847846 - Reading baby books: medicine, marketing, money and the lives of american infants.
22786496 - Glutamine supplementation for young infants with severe gastrointestinal disease.
6847956 - Hypertensive encephalopathy. a cause of neonatal seizures.
11830946 - Incidence of candida species isolated from human skin and nails: a survey.
18848806 - Habituation of visual evoked potentials in healthy infants and in infants with perivent...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Meta-Analysis; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Review     Date:  2012-07-11
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Cochrane database of systematic reviews     Volume:  7     ISSN:  1469-493X     ISO Abbreviation:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev     Publication Date:  2012  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-07-12     Completed Date:  2012-09-21     Revised Date:  2013-06-28    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100909747     Medline TA:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  CD003645     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Western Sydney and Nepean Blue Mountains Mental Health Service, Parramatta, Australia. Donna_Gillies@wsahs.nsw.gov.au.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Acute Disease
Adolescent
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia / therapy
Child
Child, Preschool
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Premature
Patient Positioning / methods*
Posture / physiology*
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Respiration, Artificial
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn / therapy*
Respiratory Insufficiency / therapy*
Respiratory Tract Infections / therapy
Treatment Outcome
Comments/Corrections
Update Of:
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(2):CD003645   [PMID:  15846674 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Drugs for preventing red blood cell dehydration in people with sickle cell disease.
Next Document:  Inhaled bronchodilators for acute chest syndrome in people with sickle cell disease.