Document Detail

Polypropylene meshes coated with a polysaccharide based bioadhesive for intra-abdominal mesh fixation in a rabbit model.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23299133     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
BACKGROUND: In this study, we evaluate a new bioadhesive for intra-abdominal onlay mesh fixation of a polypropylene-polyvinylchloride graft. METHODS: Three pieces of a commercially available polypropylene/polyvinylfluoride mesh, each 3 × 3 cm in size, and three pieces of the same mesh coated with a polysaccharide bioadhesive were fixated to the surface of the anterior abdominal wall of 30 New Zealand white rabbits. The fixation was performed either by using four transabdominal Prolene(®) 4/0 sutures, four spiral tacks (Protack 5 mm Tyco), or cyanoacrylate glue (Glubran(®) GEM, Viareggio, Italy). Each mesh position and the according kind of fixation were randomized before implantation. The animals were sacrificed 12 weeks postoperatively. After determining the extent of intra-abdominal adhesions, the meshes were excised en bloc with the anterior abdominal wall for tensile strength measurements and histological analysis. RESULTS: All meshes coated with the bioadhesive adhered to the intact peritoneum without extra fixation. Irrespective of the fixation technique coated meshes led to more and stronger adhesions. Mesh shrinkage by scarring was increased in coated meshes fixed with glue and low in uncoated meshes fixed with tacks. Testing the tensile strength, coated meshes fixed with transfascial sutures achieved the best results (16.14 ± 6.1 N), whereas coated meshes fixed with glue showed the lowest strength (10.39 ± 4.81 N). The foreign body reaction was considerably more distinctive using coated mesh. The mesh ingrowth was not influenced by this reaction. CONCLUSIONS: All meshes coated with the new bioadhesive were self-adhesive in that way; they stayed in position when attached to the peritoneum. Although this may facilitate intra-operative mesh fixation, the bioadhesive displayed several disadvantages, such as stronger adhesions and an increased shrinkage of the implant. The tensile strength was not influenced by the use of the bioadhesive. At present, we see no major advantage for polysaccharide bioadhesive applied in this study.
Roland Ladurner; Inga Drosse; Costanza Chiapponi; Dominik Bürklein; Volkmar Jansson; Andreas Kokott; Bettina Hoffmann; Günter Ziegler; Wolf Mustchler; Thomas Mussack; Matthias Schieker
Related Documents :
24481533 - Osseointegration of bioactive microarc oxidized amorphous phase/tio2 nanocrystals compo...
591523 - Skin replacement with bioplast fibrin in ophthalmology.
23486193 - Gentamicin-collagen implants to reduce surgical site infection: systematic review and m...
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2013-1-9
Journal Detail:
Title:  Surgical endoscopy     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1432-2218     ISO Abbreviation:  Surg Endosc     Publication Date:  2013 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-1-9     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8806653     Medline TA:  Surg Endosc     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Department of Surgery Innenstadt, Klinikum der Universität München, Nussbaumstrasse 20, 80336, Munich, Germany,
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Short- and long-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis in lapar...
Next Document:  Allograft dermal matrix hiatoplasty during laparoscopic primary fundoplication, paraesophageal herni...