Document Detail


Polygraphy revisited: U.S. v. Scheffer.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  10212033     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
U.S. v. Scheffer is a case that poses two questions. First, must a defendant who wishes to place polygraphic evidence before the court be allowed to do so for fear that refusal will create a Constitutional issue by depriving him of due process? Second, is polygraphic evidence admissible evidence at all, as defined by the Military Rule of Evidence or the Federal Rules of Evidence? The case, originally tried in Court-Martial, was reviewed by two military courts of appeal, with resulting judicial dissention leading to the granting of certiorari by the U.S. Supreme Court. In its decision, the Supreme Court affirmed the refusal of the Court-Martial to admit the requested polygraphic evidence.
Authors:
M G Goldzband
Related Documents :
17040153 - Closing the schiavo case: an analysis of legal reasoning.
12346793 - Kailash kaur v. state of punjab, 28 april 1987.
8672593 - A case of megakaryoblastic leukemia in a dog.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Legal Cases    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law     Volume:  27     ISSN:  1093-6793     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law     Publication Date:  1999  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1999-06-08     Completed Date:  1999-06-08     Revised Date:  2004-11-17    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9708963     Medline TA:  J Am Acad Psychiatry Law     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  133-42     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Forensic Psychiatric Training, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, USA. mgoldzband@pol.net
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Civil Rights / legislation & jurisprudence*
Electrophysiology*
Humans
Jurisprudence*
Military Personnel / legislation & jurisprudence*
Truth Disclosure*
United States

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  O'Connor v. Donaldson: retelling a classic and finding some revisionist history.
Next Document:  Developments in clergy malpractice: the case of Sanders v. Casa View Baptist Church.