|Pleomorphic adenoma with squamous and appendageal metaplasia mimicking mucoepidermoid carcinoma on cytology.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 19495404 Owner: NLM Status: PubMed-not-MEDLINE|
|BACKGROUND: Histological diversity is the hallmark of pleomorphic adenoma, the most common salivary gland tumor. It may cause difficulty in cytological interpretation, due to limited and selective sampling.
CASE PRESENTATION: A 16-year-old female patient presented with right cheek swelling. Fine needle aspiration cytology showed squamous cells, basaloid cells, and foamy cells, along with extracellular keratin and foreign body giant cells. Characteristic metachromatic fibrillary chondromyxoid stroma, which is usually seen in pleomorphic adenoma, was not seen in the aspirate. A diagnosis of mucoepidermoid carcinoma was given on cytology. Subsequent resection revealed an encapsulated pleomorphic adenoma, with extensive squamous metaplasia and appendageal differentiation on histology.
CONCLUSION: This case illustrates that pleomorphic adenoma with squamous metaplasia presents a potential for misinterpretation as mucoepidermoid carcinoma on cytology. We discuss the various pitfalls and the features that are helpful in distinguishing these two lesions.
|Meenakshi Batrani; Manju Kaushal; A K Sen; Rajbala Yadav; N K Chaturvedi|
Related Documents :
|17661244 - Determining the treatment strategy for colorectal neoplastic lesions: endoscopic assess...
24975534 - Endoscopic management of nonpolypoid colorectal lesions in colonic ibd.
3675804 - Morphometry in surgical pathology.
9972054 - Overexpression of the nucleolar organizer regions (nors) in the thyroid follicular tumo...
25206994 - Ovarian cyst formation following gonadotropin-releasing hormone-agonist administration ...
20096164 - Confocal reflectance microscopy in dermatology: promise and reality of non-invasive dia...
|Type: Journal Article Date: 2008-02-12|
|Title: CytoJournal Volume: 6 ISSN: 1742-6413 ISO Abbreviation: Cytojournal Publication Date: 2009|
|Created Date: 2009-06-04 Completed Date: 2009-12-16 Revised Date: 2013-05-23|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 101231642 Medline TA: Cytojournal Country: India|
|Languages: eng Pagination: 5 Citation Subset: -|
|Department of Pathology, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India. firstname.lastname@example.org|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Cytojournal
Journal ID (publisher-id): CJ
Publisher: Medknow Publications, India
This article is available from: http://www.cytojournal.com/content/6/1/5? 2009 Batrani et al; licensee Cytopathology Foundation Inc.
open-access: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received Day: 14 Month: 10 Year: 2008
Accepted Day: 23 Month: 11 Year: 2008
collection publication date: Year: 2009
Electronic publication date: Day: 12 Month: 2 Year: 2008
Volume: 6E-location ID: 5
PubMed Id: 19495404
Publisher Id: CJ-06-45496
|Pleomorphic adenoma with squamous and appendageal metaplasia mimicking mucoepidermoid carcinoma on cytology|
|Meenakshi BatraniAF0001||Email: email@example.com|
|Manju KaushalAF0001||Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|A. K. SenAF0001||Email: email@example.com|
|Rajbala YadavAF0001||Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|N. K. ChaturvediAF0001||Email: email@example.com|
|Department of Pathology, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India
Pleomorphic adenomas are easily identified on cytology, because of their characteristic biphasic pattern comprising of epithelial/myoepithelial cells and fibromyxochondroid stroma. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a highly accurate tool for the diagnosis of pleomorphic adenoma, with a reported reliability of 80-95%.[1, 2] However, even this common salivary gland neoplasm can be diagnostically challenging and cause pitfalls in cytodiagnosis. The presence of squamous metaplasia, especially in the absence of chondromyxoid stroma, may be misinterpreted as mucoepidermoid carcinoma.
The patient, a I6-year-old female, presented with complaint of right cheek swelling since three years. The swelling was painless and progressively increasing in size. On examination, a 1.5 ? 1.5 cm swelling was seen on both the outer aspect and the corresponding inner mucosal aspect of the right cheek. The swelling was well defined, firm, and mobile, with normal overlying skin.
Fine needle aspiration (FNA) was done using a 23 gauze needle attached to a 10 cc syringe. Both alcohol fixed and air dried smears, stained with Papanicolaou and Giemsa stains respectively, were examined. The smears showed a cellular aspirate with squamous and basaloid cells seen isolated and in clusters [Figure 1]. A few cells showed nuclear atypia [Figure 2]. Whorls of extracellular keratin, with foreign body giant cell reaction were seen [Figure 3]. Many vacuolated and foamy cells were also seen in a background of scant mucin and proteinaceous debris [Figure 4]. Metachromatic fibrillary chondromyxoid stroma, characteristic of pleomorphic adenoma, was not seen. A diagnosis of mucoepidermoid carcinoma was made, based on the cytological findings.
Surgical resection was done. Gross specimen comprised of an encapsulated soft tissue mass, measuring 1.5 cm in diameter. Cut surface was firm and grey white. No areas of hemorrhage, necrosis or cystic change were seen. Histology showed an encapsulated tumor mass with 75% of the tumor volume comprising of sheets of squamous cells, with multiple keratin filled cysts, reminiscent of trichoepitheliomatous differentiation [Figure 5]. The rest of the areas showed features of conventional pleomorphic adenoma [Figure 6]. A diagnosis of pleomorphic adenoma, with extensive squamous metaplasia and appendageal differentiation, was made.
Histological diversity is the hallmark of pleomorphic adenoma. Histological patterns vary considerably between different parts of the same tumor. Not only does the proportion between epithelial and chondromyxoid stroma vary, but there are also metaplastic variations in the epithelial and stromal components. Morphological diversity is often not a problem in surgical pathology, where the whole tumor is available for examination. However, this can lead to a misdiagnosis on cytology, due to limited and selective sampling.[3, 4]
Focal squamous metaplasia is found in about 25% of pleomorphic adenomas. Rarely, florid squamous metaplasia is reported. Adenexal differentiation in the form of extensive keratin filled cysts, reminiscent of trichoepitheliomatous differentiation, as in our case, is also reported in three other cases published in literature.[6?8]
Potential for misdiagnosis of pleomorphic adenoma as mucoepidermoid carcinoma on cytology include squamous and basaloid cells mimicking squamous and intermediate cells of mucoepidermoid carcinoma; presence of sebaceous/mucinous metaplastic cells, vacuolated histiocytic cells and mucoid material; and, absence of metachromatic fibrillar stromal material that characterizes most pleomorphic adenomas on aspiration cytology.[1, 6, 7]
In our case also, these features led to the cytological diagnosis of mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Similar cases are being reported in literature, where the cytological diagnosis of pleomorphic adenoma are given as mucoepidermoid carcinoma either as the only diagnosis or as a differential diagnosis [Table 1]. In a case report by Hamdan et al., a misdiagnosis of mucoepidermoid carcinoma was made on frozen section.
To avoid misinterpretation of pleomorphic adenoma with squamous metaplasia as mucoepidermoid carcinoma on cytology, a close scrutiny for fragments of chondromyxoid stroma, a characteristic feature for pleomorphic adenoma, is important. In our case also, on reviewing the slides again after histological diagnosis, we could find occasional tiny fragment of stroma. Also, keratinization, especially of the extracellular type, is rare in mucoepidermoid carcinoma. However, even if the features diagnostic of pleomorphic adenoma are identified, the differential diagnosis may still include a mucoepidermoid carcinoma arising in a preexisting pleomorphic adenoma. However, mucoepidermoid carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma is exceedingly rare and is usually a high grade malignancy.[6, 7]
Although FNAC is a highly accurate tool for the diagnosis of pleomorphic adenoma, the diagnosis of this common tumor can be challenging and cause pitfalls in cytodiagnosis. The presence of squamous, mucinous or sebaceous metaplasia, especially in the absence of chondromyxoid stroma, may be misinterpreted as mucoepidermoid carcinoma on cytology. Awareness of the cytological variations is important, so as to avoid diagnostic errors.
No competing interest to declare by any of the authors.
According to International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE http://www.icmje.org) ?author? is generally considered to be someone who has made substantive intellectual contributions to a published study.
Authorship credit should be based on 1) substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and 3) final approval of the version to be published. Authors should meet conditions 1, 2, and 3. Other contributors, who do not meet these criteria for authorship, are listed in an acknowledgments section.
All authors of this article declare that we qualify for authorship as defined by ICMJE http://www.icmje.org/#author.
Each author has participated sufficiently in the work and take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content of this article.
MB conceived the study, performed the FNAC, performed literature search and drafted, proof read and scrutinized the manuscript.
MK participated in the diagnostic workup, helped in drafting the manuscript and proof reading.
AKS participated in the diagnostic workup.
NKC participated in the diagnostic workup, helped in drafting the manuscript and scrutinized the manuscript.
RBY helped in drafting the manuscript and scrutinized the manuscript.
All authors read and approved the final manuscript
Each author acknowledges that this final version was read and approved.
otherAvailable FREE in open access from: http://www.cytojournal.com/text.asp?2009/6/1/5/45496
|1.||Verma K,Kapila K. Role of fine needle aspiration cytology in diagnosis of pleomorphic adenomasCytopathology 2002;13:121–7. [pmid: 11952751]|
|2.||Viguer JM,Vicandi B,Jim?nez-Heffernan JA,L?pez-Ferrer P,Limeres MA. Fine needle aspiration cytology of pleomorphic adenoma: An analysis of 212 casesActa Cytol 1997;41:786–94. [pmid: 9167703]|
|3.||Das DK,Anim JT. Pleomorphic adenoma of salivary gland: To what extent does fine needle aspiration cytology reflect histopathological features?Cytopathology 2005;16:65–70. [pmid: 15787647]|
|4.||Orell SR,Nettle WJ. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of salivary gland tumors: Problems and pitfallsPathology 1988;20:332–7. [pmid: 2853862]|
|5.||Lam KY,Ng IOL,Chan GSW. Palatal pleomorphic adenoma with florid squamous metaplasia: A potential diagnostic pitfallJ Oral Pathol Med 1998;27:407–10. [pmid: 9736432]|
|6.||Brachtel EF,Pilch BZ,Khettry U,Zembowicz A,Faquin WC. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of cystic pleomorphic adenoma with extensive adenexa like differentiation: Differential diagnostic pitfall with mucoepidermoid carcinomaDiagn Cytopathol 2002;28:100–3. [pmid: 12561031]|
|7.||Siddique NH,Wu SJ. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of cystic pleomorphic adenoma wiyh adenexa-like differentiation mimicking mucoepidermoid carcinoma: A case reportDiagn Cytopathol 2005;32:229–32. [pmid: 15754364]|
|8.||Stewart CJ,MacKenzie K,McGarry GW,Mowat A. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of salivary gland: A review of 341 casesDiagn Cytopathol 2000;22:139–46. [pmid: 10679992]|
|9.||Hamdan K,Maly B,Elashar R,Gross M. Mucinous and squamous metaplasia in benign tumors of the parotid gland: A potential pitfall in the diagnosisOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;133:987–88. [pmid: 16360528]|
To ensure integrity and highest quality of CytoJournal publications, the review process of this manuscript was conducted under a double blind model (authors are blinded for reviewers and reviewers are blinded for authors) through automatic online system.
Previous reported cases of pleomorphic adenoma with squamous metaplasia mimicking mucoepidermoid carcinoma
|Authors||Number of cases||Cytological diagnosis|
|Orell et al.||2||Mucoepidermoid carcinoma as differential|
|Vigeur et al.||1||Low grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma|
|Lam K Y||1||Differential of low grade mucoepidermoid|
|Carcinoma and well differentiated squamous cell carcinoma|
|Kusum Verma||5*||Mucoepidermoid carcinoma|
|Brachetel et al.||1||Atypical neoplasm, cannot rule out mucoepidermoid carcinoma|
*After review, three of the five cases were given as pleomorphic adenoma.
Keywords: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma, pleomorphic adenoma, squamous metaplasia.
Previous Document: Collection of the BD SurePath Pap Test with a broom device plus endocervical brush improves disease ...
Next Document: FNA of misclassified primary malignant neoplasms of the thyroid: Impact on clinical management.