Plant cell growth in tissue.  
Jump to Full Text  
MedLine Citation:

PMID: 20739609 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE 
Abstract/OtherAbstract:

Cell walls are part of the apoplasm pathway that transports water, solutes, and nutrients to cells within plant tissue. Pressures within the apoplasm (cell walls and xylem) are often different from atmospheric pressure during expansive growth of plant cells in tissue. The previously established Augmented Growth Equations are modified to evaluate the turgor pressure, water uptake, and expansive growth of plant cells in tissue when pressures within the apoplasm are lower and higher than atmospheric pressure. Analyses indicate that a stepdown and stepup in pressure within the apoplasm will cause an exponential decrease and increase in turgor pressure, respectively, and the rates of water uptake and expansive growth each undergo a rapid decrease and increase, respectively, followed by an exponential return to their initial magnitude. Other analyses indicate that pressure within the apoplasm decreases exponentially to a lower value after a stepdown in turgor pressure, which simulates its behavior after an increase in expansive growth rate. Also, analyses indicate that the turgor pressure decays exponentially to a constant value that is the sum of the critical turgor pressure and pressure within the apoplasm during stress relaxation experiments in which pressures within the apoplasm are not atmospheric pressure. Additional analyses indicate that when the turgor pressure is constant (clamped), a decrease in pressure within the apoplasm elicits an increase in elastic expansion followed by an increase in irreversible expansion rate. Some analytical results are supported by prior experimental research, and other analytical results can be verified with existing experimental methods. 
Authors:

Joseph K E Ortega 
Related Documents
:

14242019  Pressureinduced color mutation of euglena gracilis. 10066449  Thresholddependent dna synthesis by pure pressure in human aortic smooth muscle cells:... 17779439  Triton's global heat budget. 7204199  Correlation studies of individual variation in susceptibility to various components of ... 15204749  Altered heartrate variability in asthmatic and healthy volunteers exposed to concentra... 3475459  Fracture toughness of provisional resins for fixed prosthodontics. 12010739  Blocking cerebrospinal fluid absorption through the cribriform plate increases resting ... 9458239  Human kallikrein gene delivery attenuates hypertension, cardiac hypertrophy, and renal ... 15613939  Intake of fruits, vegetables, and dairy products in early childhood and subsequent bloo... 
Publication Detail:

Type: Journal Article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, NonP.H.S. Date: 20100825 
Journal Detail:

Title: Plant physiology Volume: 154 ISSN: 15322548 ISO Abbreviation: Plant Physiol. Publication Date: 2010 Nov 
Date Detail:

Created Date: 20101103 Completed Date: 20110210 Revised Date: 20110728 
Medline Journal Info:

Nlm Unique ID: 0401224 Medline TA: Plant Physiol Country: United States 
Other Details:

Languages: eng Pagination: 124453 Citation Subset: IM 
Affiliation:

Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado 802173364, USA. joseph.ortega@ucdenver.edu 
Export Citation:

APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex 
MeSH Terms  
Descriptor/Qualifier:

Cell Wall
/
physiology* Osmotic Pressure Plants / cytology*, growth & development Xylem / physiology* 
Comments/Corrections 
Full Text  
Journal Information Journal ID (nlmta): Plant Physiol Journal ID (hwp): plantphysiol Journal ID (publisherid): aspb ISSN: 00320889 ISSN: 15322548 Publisher: American Society of Plant Biologists 
Article Information Download PDF © 2010 American Society of Plant Biologists Received Day: 12 Month: 7 Year: 2010 Accepted Day: 24 Month: 8 Year: 2010 Print publication date: Month: 11 Year: 2010 Electronic publication date: Day: 25 Month: 8 Year: 2010 pmcrelease publication date: Day: 25 Month: 8 Year: 2010 Volume: 154 Issue: 3 First Page: 1244 Last Page: 1253 ID: 2971603 PubMed Id: 20739609 Publisher Id: 162644 DOI: 10.1104/pp.110.162644 
Plant Cell Growth in Tissue^{1}^{[OA]}  
Joseph K.E. Ortega*  
Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado 80217–3364 

*Email joseph.ortega@ucdenver.edu. 1This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant nos. MCB–0640542 and MCB–0948921). The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Joseph K.E. Ortega (joseph.ortega@ucdenver.edu). [OA]Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription. www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.110.162644 
Cell walls perform many functions for plant, algal, and fungal cells. Physical and chemical protection from the environment and physical support for cells and organs are obvious functions. Cell walls also withstand the stresses imposed by turgor pressure and deform irreversibly and reversible (elastically) during expansive growth. Irreversible wall deformations during expansive growth control cell enlargement, size, and shape. Growing and mature (nongrowing) cell walls undergo elastic deformations after changes in turgor pressure caused by changes in water status and environmental conditions. Elastic wall deformations are fundamental to the water relations of plant, algal, and fungal cells. For plant cells in tissues and organs, cell walls are part of the apoplasm pathway that transports water, solutes, and nutrients to cells.
Importantly, pressures within the apoplasm (cell walls and xylem) are frequently different from atmospheric pressure during expansive growth of plant cells in tissues and organs. Lower pressures (tensions) are related to transpiration rates from plant organs and to expansive growth of cells in plant organs, e.g. ^{Boyer (1967}, ^{2001}), ^{Molz and Boyer (1978)}, ^{Nonami and Boyer (1987}, ^{1993}), ^{Nonami and Hashimoto (1996)}, ^{Passioura and Boyer (2003)}, ^{Boyer and Silk (2004)}, ^{Koch et al. (2004)}, ^{Wiegers et al. (2009)}, and the references within. Higher pressures (root pressures) occur during the spring when the soil is well hydrated (e.g. ^{Kramer, 1932}). Bleeding sap from cuts and broken stems is evidence of root pressure. Also, higher pressures may occur diurnally, during the night when transpiration rates are low (e.g. ^{Tang and Boyer, 2008}). Guttation drops on leaves in the morning are evidence of these higher pressures.
Prior research indicates that a significant amount of chemistry and molecular biology occur within cell walls undergoing irreversible deformation during expansive growth (e.g. ^{Cosgrove, 2005}; ^{Boyer, 2009}). Two questions arise. First, how do pressures within the wall that are different from atmospheric pressure affect the turgor pressure, water uptake, and growth rate of cells in plant organs such as roots, stems, and leaves? Second, how are relevant chemical reactions affected by lower and higher pressures within the wall? The analyses conducted in this article focus on the first question.
Previously, equations derived by ^{Lockhart (1965)} for wall deformation and water uptake (Growth Equations) were augmented with terms for elastic wall deformation (^{Ortega, 1985}) and transpiration (^{Ortega et al., 1988}). In this article, the previously established Augmented Growth Equations (^{Ortega, 1985}, ^{1990}, ^{1994}, ^{2004}; ^{Ortega et al., 1988}; ^{Geitmann and Ortega, 2009}) are modified to evaluate the turgor pressure, water uptake, and expansive growth of plant cells in tissue when pressures within the apoplasm are lower and higher than atmospheric pressure. In addition, the pressure within the apoplasm is evaluated after turgor pressure in cells decrease, thus simulating the condition produced by an increase in expansive growth rate of cells in plant tissues and organs. Also, the modified equations are used to determine how the results of stress relaxation experiments conducted on growing plant organs are affected by pressures within the apoplasm that are not atmospheric pressure. Last, the expansive growth of a plant cell is evaluated when pressure within the apoplasm undergoes a semiinstantaneous change while the turgor pressure remains constant, i.e. clamped. Some analytical results are supported by prior experimental research, and some analytical results can be verified with existing experimental methods.
Expansive growth of cells with walls is the result of two simultaneous and interrelated biophysical processes: water uptake and wall deformation. Water uptake produces turgor pressure, which stresses the wall. The wall deforms in response to the wall stresses. During expansive growth, wall deformations are both irreversible and reversible (elastic). Assembly and incorporation of wall materials into the deforming wall control wall thickness, mechanical properties, and mechanical behavior (deformation rate and direction).
The Augmented Growth Equations are biophysical equations that describe the turgor pressure, water uptake, expansive growth, and wall deformation of cells with walls. The magnitude and behavior of the inclusive biophysical variables are dependent on relevant biological processes. Previously, the Augmented Growth Equations were used to analyze and interpret the experimental results of growing cells with walls for time periods of several minutes to hours for plant cells in tissue (e.g. ^{Cosgrove, 1985}, ^{1987}; ^{Serpe and Matthews, 1992}, ^{2000}; ^{Murphy and Ortega, 1995}, ^{1996}), isolated fungal cells (e.g. ^{Ortega et al., 1988}, ^{1989}, ^{1991}), and isolated algal cells (e.g. ^{Proseus et al., 1999}, ^{2000}). ^{Lewicka (2006)} extended their application to whole plants and longer time periods (days). ^{Ortega (2004)} and ^{Geitmann and Ortega (2009)} reviewed these biophysical equations.
Equation 1 describes the relative rate of change in water volume, (dV_{w}/Vdt), for the general condition when a cell is exposed to the atmosphere and loses water through transpiration (^{Ortega et al., 1988}; ^{Ortega, 1990}, ^{1994}, ^{2004}; ^{Geitmann and Ortega, 2009}).
Equation 1 is written in relative terms.
(rate of change in water volume) = (rate of water uptake) – (transpiration rate)
where V is the volume, t is the time, L is the membrane relative hydraulic conductance (L = L_{p}A/V), L_{p} is the membrane hydraulic conductivity, A is the membrane area, σ is the solute reflection coefficient, ΔΠ is the osmotic pressure difference across the membrane (ΔΠ = Π_{I} – Π_{E}), P is the turgor pressure (a gauge pressure relative to atmospheric pressure as measured with a pressure probe, P_{I} – P_{atm}, where P_{I} is the pressure inside the membrane and P_{atm} is defined to be zero), and T is the relative rate of change in water volume lost via transpiration (relative volumetric transpiration rate), i.e. T = dV_{T}/Vdt.
Equation 2 describes the relative rate of change in volume of the cell wall chamber, dV_{cwc}/Vdt, as the sum of irreversible deformation rate and reversible (elastic) deformation rate of the wall (^{Ortega, 1985}, ^{1990}, ^{1994}, ^{2004}; ^{Ortega et al., 1988}; ^{Geitmann and Ortega, 2009}). Equation 2 is written in relative terms.
(wall expansion rate) = (irreversible deformation rate) + (elastic deformation rate)
The biophysical variable φ is the irreversible extensibility of the wall, P_{C} is the critical turgor pressure (related to the yield threshold, Y), and ε is the volumetric elastic modulus.
Because the relative rate of change in volume of the cell contents, water, and cell wall chamber are approximately equal, a biophysical equation describing the rate of change of turgor pressure, Equation 3, can be obtained by combining Equations 1 and 2 with the elimination of dV_{w}/Vdt and dV_{cwc}/Vdt because dV_{w}/Vdt ≈ dV_{cwc}/Vdt (^{Ortega, 1994}, ^{2004}; ^{Geitmann and Ortega, 2009}).
(rate of change of turgor pressure) ∝ {(water uptake rate) – (irreversible deformation rate) – (transpiration rate)}
Equation 3 states that the rate of change of turgor pressure is proportional to the relative magnitudes of water uptake rate, irreversible deformation rate of the wall, and volumetric transpiration rate. Equation 3 may be solved to determine how the turgor pressure changes after an instantaneous change in the magnitude of the one or more of the inclusive biophysical variables and/or the relative volumetric transpiration rate, i.e. Equations 4 and 5.
Equation 4 describes an exponential decay of the turgor pressure from P_{o} (turgor pressure at t = 0) to P_{eq} (equilibrium turgor pressure) that occurs subsequent to an instantaneous change in the magnitude of one or more of the inclusive biophysical variables and/or the relative volumetric transpiration rate. The exponential decay has a time constant, t_{c} = [ε (φ + L)]^{−1}. The expression for P_{eq} (5) is new and describes the equilibrium turgor pressure for a growing cell that is transpiring. Interestingly, Equation 5 establishes a relationship between the equilibrium turgor pressure and the transpiration rate. It is apparent that an increase or decrease in transpiration rate will decrease or increase the magnitude of the equilibrium turgor pressure, respectively. In the special case when the transpiration is zero, Equation 5 reduces to P_{eq} = (L σ ΔΠ + φ P_{C}) (φ + L)^{−1}, which is the same expression previously obtained by ^{Ortega (1985)} and previously derived for turgor pressure in equilibrium (steady) growth by ^{Lockhart (1965)} and ^{Ray et al. (1972)}.
In plant tissue, the pressure external to the cell membrane is the pressure within the cell wall or apoplasm, P_{A} (a gauge pressure relative to the atmospheric pressure, P_{atm}, where P_{atm} is defined to be zero). Importantly, P_{A} may be different than P_{atm} for plant cells in tissue, i.e. not zero. Therefore, it is useful to expand Equation 1 so that water uptake can be evaluated for cells in tissue when the pressure within the apoplasm is not zero.
(rate of change in water volume) = (rate of water uptake)
The turgor pressure, P_{I}, is the pressure inside the cell membrane as measured with the pressure probe, and P_{A} is the pressure within the apoplasm as measured with the pressure chamber. The osmotic pressure difference across the membrane is now, ΔΠ = Π_{I} – Π_{A}, where Π_{I} is the osmotic pressure inside the membrane and Π_{A} is the osmotic pressure within the apoplasm. The term for the relative transpiration rate has been omitted in Equation 6 because cells in tissue are typically not exposed directly to the atmosphere where they can lose water via transpiration. However, experimental evidence demonstrates a relationship between the magnitude of P_{A} and the magnitude of transpiration rates from plant tissue and organs, e.g. in maize (Zea mays) leaves, P_{A} is negative during the day when transpiration rates are large and positive during the night when transpiration rates are small (^{Tang and Boyer, 2008}).
Equation 2 is expanded to explicitly include P_{I} and P_{A}, and Equation 7 is obtained in relative terms.
(wall expansion rate) = (irreversible deformation rate) + (elastic deformation rate)
Similarly, Equation 3 is expanded to explicitly include P_{I} and P_{A}, and Equation 8 is obtained after rearranging the terms.
The behavior of the water uptake, expansive growth, and turgor pressure is evaluated using Equations 6 to 8 after a stepdown in P_{A}; P_{A} = P_{AO}– ΔP_{a}, where P_{AO} is the pressure within the apoplasm before the stepdown and –ΔP_{a} is the stepdown. The turgor pressure couples the equations for water uptake and expansive growth (Eqs. 6 and 7, respectively), so the equation for turgor pressure (Eq. 8) is solved first and its solution is used in the equations for water uptake and expansive growth to determine their behavior. Immediately after the stepdown, the magnitude of P_{A} (P_{AO}– ΔP_{a}) is constant and dP_{A}/dt is zero, and Equation 8 becomes Equation 9.
Assuming that all the biophysical parameters remain constant after the stepdown, Equation 9 takes the form dP_{I}/dt + A P_{I} = B. The constants A and B are as follows: A = ε (φ + L), and B = ε (L σ ΔΠ + φ P_{C}) + ε (φ + L) (P_{AO}– ΔP_{a}). The solution for turgor pressure as a function of time, P_{I} (t), is P_{I} (t) = [P_{I} (0) – A^{−1} B] exp {– A t} + A^{−1} B, where P_{I} (0) is the turgor pressure at t = 0, i.e. the initial equilibrium turgor pressure. Substituting in the expressions for A and B, and after some algebra and rearranging, Equation 10 is obtained.
Note that at t = 0 (immediately after the stepdown in P_{A}), P_{I} (0) = P_{eqO} + P_{AO}, i.e. the initial equilibrium turgor pressure. The expression for P_{eqO} is:
At t = ∞, P_{I} (∞) = P_{eqO} + P_{AO}– ΔP_{a}, i.e. the new equilibrium turgor pressure that is lower than the initial equilibrium turgor pressure by ΔP_{a}. Therefore, Equation 10 describes the exponential decay of the turgor pressure from its initial equilibrium value (P_{eqO} + P_{AO}) to its new equilibrium value (P_{eqO} + P_{AO}– ΔP_{a}). The time constant for the exponential decay is, t_{c} = [ε (ϕ + L)]^{−1}. Interestingly, the magnitude of the pressure difference between the inside and outside of the membrane is the same before the stepdown, P_{I}– P_{A} = (P_{eqO} + P_{AO}) – P_{AO} = P_{eqO} and after the exponential decay at t = ∞, P_{I} (∞) – P_{A} = (P_{eqO} + P_{AO} – ΔP_{a}) – (P_{AO} – ΔP_{a}) = P_{eqO}.
The water uptake may be evaluated by substituting the solution for P_{I} (t), i.e. Equation 10, into Equation 6. After some algebra and rearranging, Equation 12 is obtained.
Note that at t = 0, dV_{w}/Vdt = L [σ ΔΠ – P_{eqO}] – L ΔP_{a}, which represents a decrease in water uptake rate when compared to the rate before the stepdown in P_{A}. At t = ∞, dV_{w}/Vdt = L [σΔΠ – P_{eqO}], which represents the original magnitude of water uptake rate before the stepdown in P_{A}. Therefore, Equation 12 describes an exponential increase in water uptake rate from an initial smaller rate immediately after the stepdown in P_{A} to the original rate before the stepdown in P_{A}.
The expansive growth may be evaluated by substituting the expression for P_{I} (t), i.e. Equation 10, into Equation 7. Note that immediately after the stepdown, dP_{A}/dt = 0. Equation 13 is obtained after some calculus, algebra, and rearranging.
Note at t = 0, dV_{cwc}/Vdt= ϕ [P_{eqO} – P_{C}] – L ΔP_{a}, which represents a decrease in expansive growth rate when compared to that before the stepdown in P_{A}. At t = ∞, dV_{cwc}/Vdt= ϕ [P_{eqO} – P_{C}], which is the same magnitude as that before the stepdown in P_{A}. Equation 13 describes the exponential increase in expansive growth rate from an initial smaller rate immediately after the stepdown in P_{A} to the original rate before the stepdown in P_{A}. A schematic illustration of the behavior for P_{I}, P_{A}, dV_{w}/Vdt, and dV_{cwc}/Vdt as a function of time (Eqs. 10, 12, and 13, respectively) is shown in Figure 1A.
The behavior of the turgor pressure, water uptake, and expansive growth is evaluated after a stepup in P_{A} (P_{A} = P_{AO} + ΔP_{a}) using the same analyses described in the previous section, and Equations 14 to 16 are obtained, respectively.
Equation 14 describes the exponential increase of the turgor pressure from its initial equilibrium value (t = 0), P_{eqO} + P_{AO}, to its new equilibrium value (t = ∞), P_{eqO} + P_{AO} + ΔP_{a}, and the time constant for the exponential increase is t_{c} = [ε (ϕ + L)]^{−1}. As before, the magnitude of the pressure difference between the inside and outside of the membrane is the same before the stepup, P_{I}– P_{A} = (P_{eqO} + P_{AO}) – P_{AO} = P_{eqO}, and after the exponential decay at t = ∞, P_{I} (∞) – P_{A} = (P_{eqO} + P_{AO} + ΔP_{a}) – (P_{AO} + ΔP_{a}) = P_{eqO}.
Equation 15 describes an exponential decrease in water uptake rate from an initial larger rate immediately after the stepup in P_{A} (i.e. L [σ ΔΠ – P_{eqO}] + L ΔP_{a}) to the original rate before the stepup in P_{A} (i.e. L [σ ΔΠ – P_{eqO}]). Equation 16 describes the exponential decrease in expansive growth rate from an initial larger rate immediately after the stepup in P_{A} (i.e. ϕ [P_{eqO} – P_{C}] + L ΔP_{a}) to the original rate before the stepup in P_{A} (i.e. ϕ [P_{eqO} – P_{C}]). Time constants for both the decay of the water uptake rate and the expansive growth rate are the same as before, t_{c} = [ε (ϕ + L)]^{−1}. Schematic illustration of the behavior for P_{I}, P_{A}, dV_{w}/Vdt, and dV_{cwc}/Vdt as a function of time (Eqs. 14–16, respectively) are shown in Figure 1B.
The pressure within the apoplasm as a function of time, P_{A} (t), after a stepdown in turgor pressure, –ΔP_{i}, is evaluated using Equation 8. The magnitude of the initial equilibrium turgor pressure before the stepdown is P_{I} = P_{eqO} + P_{AO}, where P_{AO} is the initial pressure within the apoplasm. The magnitude of the new turgor pressure after the stepdown (P_{IN} = P_{eqO} + P_{AO} – ΔP_{i}) is constant, so dP_{I}/dt is zero immediately after the stepdown. Then Equation 8 becomes Equation 17.
Assuming that all the biophysical parameters remain constant after the stepdown in turgor pressure and employing the general solution used for Equation 9, the solution for P_{A} (t) is obtained.
It is noted that at t = 0 (immediately after the stepdown in P_{I}), P_{A} (0) = P_{AO}. At t = ∞, P_{A} (∞) = P_{AO}– ΔP_{i}. Therefore, Equation 18 describes the exponential decay of the pressure within the apoplasm from its initial value, P_{AO}, to a value that is smaller by the magnitude of the turgor pressure stepdown, P_{AO}– ΔP_{i}. The time constant for the exponential decay is t_{c} = [ε (ϕ + L)]^{−1}. Interestingly, the magnitude of the pressure difference between the inside and outside of the membrane is the same before the stepdown, P_{I}– P_{A} = (P_{eqO} + P_{AO}) – P_{AO} = P_{eqO}, and after the exponential decay at t = ∞, P_{IN}– P_{A} (∞) = (P_{eqO} + P_{AO}– ΔP_{i}) – (P_{AO}– ΔP_{i}) = P_{eqO}. A schematic illustration of the behavior for P_{I} and P_{A} as a function of time is shown in Figure 2.
In a stress relaxation experiment, the water uptake and transpiration are eliminated from the growing plant organ. Therefore, the terms that represent water uptake and transpiration in the Augmented Growth Equations, L (σ ΔΠ – P) and T, are zero. The change in turgor pressure that results from the elimination of water uptake and transpiration (stress relaxation experiment) is evaluated with a modified form of Equation 3, i.e. Equation 19 (^{Cosgrove, 1985}; ^{Ortega, 1985}).
(turgor pressure decay rate) ∝ {irreversible deformation rate}
Equation 19 indicates that the turgor pressure decay rate, –dP/dt, is proportional to the relative irreversible deformation rate of the wall, ϕ (P – P_{C}). Equation 19 can be expanded to explicitly include P_{I} and P_{A}, i.e. Equation 20.
In the special case, where P_{A} is constant but not P_{atm} (not zero), Equation 21 is obtained.
(turgor pressure decay rate) ∝ {irreversible deformation rate}
The solution is obtained by integrating Equation 21, noting that the initial equilibrium turgor pressure is P_{I} = P_{eqO} + P_{A}.
At t = 0, P_{I} (0) = P_{eqO} + P_{A}, i.e. the initial equilibrium turgor pressure. At t = ∞, P_{I} (∞) = P_{C} + P_{A}. Equation 22 describes an exponential decay of the turgor pressure (as measured with a pressure probe) from its initial equilibrium value, P_{eqO} + P_{A}, to a constant value, P_{C} + P_{A}. The time constant for the exponential decay is, t_{c} = (εϕ)^{−1}.
When P_{A} = P_{atm} = 0, the solution previously reported by ^{Cosgrove (1985)} and ^{Ortega (1985)} is recovered for a stress relaxation experiment.
Equation 23 describes an exponential decay of the turgor pressure from its initial equilibrium value, P_{eqO}, to a constant value, P_{C}, with a time constant, t_{c} = (εϕ)^{−1}.
Consider the case when the pressure within the apoplasm is decreased from an initial constant value, P_{AO}, by an amount, ΔP_{a} (P_{A} = P_{AO} – ΔP_{a}), in a short time interval, Δt. The initial equilibrium turgor pressure, P_{I} = P_{eqO} + P_{AO}, is kept constant (clamped); thus, dP_{I}/dt = 0. Assuming the magnitudes of ϕ, ε, and P_{C} remain constant, then Equation 7 becomes Equation 24.
(increase in wall expansion rate) = (increase in irreversible deformation rate) + (semiinstantaneous elastic expansion)
Equation 24 describes the following expansive growth behavior in relative terms; a semiinstantaneous elastic expansion of the wall, (1/ε) [ΔP_{a} /Δt], followed by an increase in the rate of irreversible deformation of the wall, ϕ [{P_{eqO} + ΔP_{a}} – P_{C}]. A schematic illustration of the behavior of P_{I}, P_{A}, and expansive growth (ln V_{cwc}, natural logarithm of the volume of the cell wall chamber) as a function of time is shown in Figure 3A. Note that the slope of the lnV_{cwc} curve is d(lnV_{cwc})/dt = (dV_{cwc}/Vdt).
If the pressure within the apoplasm is increased from an initial constant value, P_{AO}, by an amount, ΔP_{a} (P_{A} = P_{AO} + ΔP_{a}), in a short time interval, Δt, and the initial equilibrium turgor pressure, P_{I} = P_{eqO} + P_{AO}, is kept constant (clamped), Equation 25 is obtained.
(decrease in wall expansion rate) = (decrease in irreversible deformation rate) + (semiinstantaneous elastic contraction)
Equation 25 describes a decrease in expansive growth rate in relative terms; a semiinstantaneous elastic contraction (recovered elastic expansion) of the wall, (1/ε) [–ΔP_{a}/Δt], followed by a decrease in the irreversible deformation rate of the wall, ϕ [{P_{eqO} – ΔP_{a}} – P_{C}]. The irreversible deformation rate will decrease to a smaller rate when the magnitude of {P_{eqO} – ΔP_{a}} is greater than P_{C}. If the magnitude of {P_{eqO} – ΔP_{a}} is smaller than P_{C}, the irreversible deformation rate will stop. A schematic illustration of the behavior of P_{I}, P_{A}, and expansive growth (ln V_{cwc}) as a function of time is shown in Figure 3B.
After a stepdown in pressure within the apoplasm, analysis indicates that the turgor pressure will decrease exponentially from an initial equilibrium pressure to a new equilibrium pressure that is lower in magnitude by the amount of the stepdown in pressure (Eq. 10; Fig. 1A). Similarly, a stepup in pressure within the apoplasm will result in an exponential increase in turgor pressure to a new equilibrium pressure that is higher than the previous value by the amount of the stepup in pressure (Eq. 14; Fig. 1B). The time constants for the exponential changes are the same for both cases, t_{c} = [ε (ϕ + L)]^{−1}. The magnitude of the pressure difference across the cell membrane is the same before the step changes in pressure and after the exponential decay to new equilibrium pressures. The described behavior is consistent with and supports the assumption of local equilibrium made by ^{Molz and Ikenberry (1974)} and ^{Molz and Boyer (1978)} in their theoretical analyses of water transport in plant tissue.
Other analyses indicate that a stepdown in pressure within the apoplasm will produce a sharp decrease in rates of water uptake and expansive growth, followed by an exponential increase to their original magnitudes (Eqs. 12 and 13; Fig. 1A). It is noted that the magnitude and behavior of the transient decrease in rates of water uptake and expansive growth are the same, L (– ΔP_{a}) exp {– ε (ϕ + L) t}. A stepup in pressure within the apoplasm will produce a sharp increase in the rates of water uptake and expansive growth, followed by an exponential decrease to their initial magnitudes (Eqs. 15 and 16; Fig. 1B). Again, the magnitude and behavior of the transient increase in rates of water uptake and expansive growth are the same, L ΔP_{a} exp {– ε (ϕ + L) t}. Time constants for the exponential changes are the same for all cases, t_{c} = [ε (ϕ + L)]^{−1}.
It may appear unusual that new equilibrium turgor pressures are lower and higher than the initial (Fig. 1), but the magnitude of the expansive growth rate after the exponential change is the same as the initial magnitude. It may be thought that the magnitude of P_{I} – P_{C} should be different; thus, the rate of irreversible deformation of the wall should be different. However, the magnitude of the wall stress is determined by the pressure difference across the membrane, i.e. P_{I} – P_{A}. Because the magnitude of the pressure difference across the membrane is the same before the step change (P_{eqO}) and after the exponential decay (P_{eqO}), the magnitude of the wall stress is also the same before the step change and after the exponential decay. Also, P_{C} is related to the critical stress in the wall that must be exceeded before irreversible extension of the wall occurs. Because the magnitudes of the wall stress and the critical wall stress are the same before the step change and after the exponential decay, the irreversible deformation rate of the wall and the expansive growth rate remain the same before and after.
A quantitative evaluation of a stepdown (–0.2 MPa) followed by a stepup (0.4 MPa) in pressure within the apoplasm can further illustrate the behavior described by these equations. Consider a plant cell in tissue that is initially growing in equilibrium (constant growth) and the pressure within the apoplasm is atmospheric (i.e. P_{A} = 0). The equilibrium turgor pressure is described by Equation 5 when T = 0, then P_{eq} = P_{eqO} (Eq. 11). For the sake of discussion, assume σ ΔΠ = 1.0 MPa, P_{eqO} = 0.6 MPa, and P_{C} = 0.3 MPa. Also assume that L and ϕ are constant. The pressure difference across the membrane is, P_{eqO} – P_{atm} = 0.6 MPa – 0 = 0.6 MPa. Equation 1 is used to determine the relative rate of change in water volume (water uptake rate), dV_{w}/Vdt = L (1.0 MPa – 0.6 MPa) = L (0.4 MPa). Equation 2 is used to determine the relative rate of change in volume of the cell wall chamber (expansive growth rate), dV_{cwc}/Vdt= ϕ (P – P_{C}) = ϕ (0.6 MPa – 0.3 MPa) = ϕ (0.3 MPa). Note that the same results are obtained using Equations 6 and 7 when P_{A} = 0.
Now assume P_{A} is stepped down by 0.2 MPa; P_{A} = P_{AO}– ΔP_{a} = 0 – 0.2 MPa = – 0.2 MPa. Equation 10 is used to determine the turgor pressure at t = 0, P_{I} (0) = P_{eqO} + P_{AO} = 0.6 MPa + 0 = 0.6 MPa, and at t = ∞, P_{I} (∞) = P_{eqO} + P_{AO}– ΔP_{a} = 0.6 MPa + 0 – 0.2 MPa = 0.4 MPa. So the new equilibrium turgor pressure is P_{I} (∞) = 0.4 MPa, and the pressure within the apoplasm is P_{A} = – 0.2 MPa. The pressure difference across the membrane is P_{I} (∞) – P_{A} = 0.4 MPa – (– 0.2 MPa) = 0.6 MPa, which is equal to the original value. Evaluating Equation 12 at t = 0, dV_{w}/Vdt = L (1.0 MPa – 0.6 MPa – 0.2 MPa) = L (0.2 MPa), which represents a decrease in water uptake rate. Evaluating Equation 12 at t = ∞, dV_{w}/Vdt = L (1.0 MPa – 0.6 MPa) = L (0.4 MPa), which is equal to the original water uptake rate. Evaluating Equation 13 at t = 0, dV_{cwc}/Vdt = ϕ (0.6 MPa – 0.3 MPa) – L (0.2 MPa) = ϕ (0.3 MPa) – L (0.2 MPa), which represents a decrease in expansive growth rate. Evaluating Equation 13 at t = ∞, dV_{cwc}/Vdt = ϕ (0.6 MPa – 0.3 MPa) = ϕ (0.3 MPa), which is equal to the original expansive growth rate.
Subsequently, P_{A} is stepped up by 0.4 MPa; P_{A} = P_{AO} + ΔP_{a} = – 0.2 MPa + 0.4 MPa = 0.2 MPa. Equation 14 is used to determine the turgor pressure at t = 0, P_{I} (0) = P_{eqO} + P_{AO} = 0.6 MPa – 0.2 MPa = 0.4 MPa, and at t = ∞, P_{I} (∞) = P_{eqO} + P_{AO} + ΔP_{a}, = 0.6 MPa – 0.2 MPa + 0.4 MPa = 0.8 MPa. So the new equilibrium turgor pressure is P_{I} (∞) = 0.8 MPa, and the pressure within the apoplasm is P_{A} = 0.2 MPa. The pressure difference across the membrane is P_{I} (∞) – P_{A} = 0.8 MPa – 0.2 MPa = 0.6 MPa, which is equal to the original value. Evaluating Equation 15 at t = 0, dV_{w}/Vdt = L (1.0 MPa – 0.6 MPa + 0.4 MPa) = L (0.8 MPa), which represents an increase in water uptake rate. Evaluating Equation 15 at t = ∞, dV_{w}/Vdt = L (1.0 MPa – 0.6 MPa) = L (0.4 MPa), which is equal to the original water uptake rate. Evaluating Equation 16 at t = 0, dV_{cwc}/Vdt = ϕ (0.6 MPa – 0.3 MPa) + L (0.4 MPa) = ϕ (0.3 MPa) + L (0.4 MPa), which represents an increase in expansive growth rate. Evaluating Equation 16 at t = ∞, dV_{cwc}/Vdt = ϕ (0.6 MPa – 0.3 MPa) = ϕ (0.3 MPa), which is equal to the original expansive growth rate.
This quantitative evaluation of a stepdown followed by a stepup in P_{A} illustrates that changes in P_{A} will cause changes in P_{I} so that the rates of water uptake and expansive growth rate remain unchanged after initial transient changes, if the biophysical variables remain constant. The duration of the transient changes can be estimated with the time constant because approximately 98% of the exponential decay occurs after four time constants. As an example, the magnitude of t_{c} is estimated using data from ^{Cosgrove (1985)} for growing cells in pea (Pisum sativum) stems; ε = 9.5 MPa, ϕ = 0.084 MPa^{−1} h^{−1}, and L = 2.0 MPa^{−1} h^{−1}, and t_{c} = [ε (ϕ + L)]^{−1} = [19.8 h^{−1}] ^{−1} ≈ 0.050 h ≈ 3 min. Therefore, the duration of the transient changes can be estimated for growing cells in pea stems to be 4 t_{c} = 0.2 h = 12 min.
Expansive growth rate behaviors after step changes in pressure within the apoplasm, as shown in Figure 1, draw support from experimental studies conducted with maize leaves. ^{Tang and Boyer (2008)} report a sharp downward spike in elongation rate followed by an increase, which appears to be exponential, to a higher rate at the beginning of the morning for maize leaves. They report that the transpiration rate is rapidly increased at the beginning of the morning and produces water tension within the apoplasm. Thus, at the beginning of the morning, the behavior of the pressure within the apoplasm is similar to a stepdown. The observed downward spike followed by an exponential increase in elongation rate is similar to the behavior described by Equation 13 and Figure 1A for dV_{cwc}/Vdt. However, Equation 13 does not predict the higher elongation rate reported to occur during the day when the temperature is increased (see Figs. 2, 3, and 5 of ^{Tang and Boyer, 2008}). The analyses conducted here assume that the magnitudes of the biophysical variables are constant, so the initial expansive growth rate is recovered after the exponential increase. A higher expansive growth rate can be obtained with a change in one or more of the biophysical variables. For example, an increase in elongation rate will occur if an increase in magnitude of the irreversible wall extensibility, ϕ, accompanied the stepdown in P_{A} at the beginning of the day. Perhaps the increase in the magnitude of ϕ is the result of the increase in temperature or a cascade of biochemical events that begin with the initiation of photosynthesis, or it may be that the water tensions in the wall alter relevant biochemistry that effectively alters the magnitude of ϕ.
The elongation rate behavior of a maize leaf is reversed at the beginning of the night. ^{Tang and Boyer (2008)} report a sharp upward spike in elongation rate followed by what appears to be an exponential decrease to a smaller rate. At the beginning of the night, the transpiration rate is rapidly reduced and positive root pressure develops during the night producing guttation drops on the leaf. Thus, at the beginning of the night, the behavior of the pressure within the apoplasm is similar to a stepup. The observed upward spike followed by an exponential decrease in elongation rate is similar to the behavior described by Equation 16 and Figure 1B for dV_{cwc}/Vdt. Equation 16 and Figure 1B predict that the initial expansive growth rate is recovered after the exponential decrease. Again this is a consequence of assuming the biophysical variables to be constant. Interestingly, there is evidence that in some cases the initial elongation rate is recovered at the beginning of the night, after the exponential decrease, when the temperature is constant (see figure 2 of ^{Tang and Boyer, 2008}). Equation 16 does not predict the smaller elongation rate that occurs during the night when the temperature is decreased (see Figs. 3 and 5 of ^{Tang and Boyer, 2008}). A decrease in elongation rate can be obtained if a decrease in magnitude of the irreversible wall extensibility, ϕ, accompanied the stepup in P_{A} at the beginning or the night. Perhaps the decrease in the magnitude of ϕ is the result of the decrease in temperature, termination of photosynthesis, or higher pressures within the apoplasm that may alter relevant wall biochemistry that effectively alters the magnitude of ϕ.
Next, the affect of an increase in expansive growth rate on the behavior of the pressure within the apoplasm is evaluated. An examination of Equation 3 reveals that an increase in irreversible deformation rate of the wall (expansive growth rate) will cause a decrease in turgor pressure. Equation 8 is used to determine how a decrease in turgor pressure, associated with an increase in expansive growth rate, affects the pressure within the apoplasm. A stepdown in turgor pressure can simulate a decrease in turgor pressure caused by an increase in expansive growth rate. Equation 17 describes the rate of change of the pressure within the apoplasm immediately after a stepdown in turgor pressure. Its solution, Equation 18, describes an exponential decay of the pressure within the apoplasm to a value that is less than the initial pressure by the magnitude of the stepdown in turgor pressure (Fig. 2). The time constant for the exponential decay is, t_{c} = [ε (ϕ + L)]^{−1}. The analysis indicates that a lower pressure within the apoplasm is produced when the turgor pressure decreases because of an increase in expansive growth rate. The decrease in turgor pressure and accompanying decrease in pressure within the apoplasm will decrease the water potential in the local region of the growing cell. This result is consistent with a growthinduced decrease in water potential proposed and measured by ^{Molz and Boyer (1978)}, ^{Nonami and Boyer (1987}, ^{1993}), ^{Boyer (2001)}, ^{Tang and Boyer (2008)}, and relevant references within. Furthermore, the analysis indicates that the magnitude of the pressure difference between the inside (turgor pressure) and outside (pressure within the apoplasm) of the membrane is the same before the stepdown and after the exponential decay. This result is consistent with the condition of local equilibrium proposed by ^{Molz and Ikenberry (1974)} and ^{Molz and Boyer (1978)}.
Stress relaxation experiments, during which the turgor pressure of single cells is measured directly with the pressure probe, have been conducted in plant tissue (e.g. ^{Cosgrove, 1985}, ^{1987}) and in single isolated cells (e.g. ^{Ortega et al., 1989}). For individual cells in plant tissue and isolated single cells, it is shown that the turgor pressure decays exponentially to a constant value, P_{C}, when the pressure external to the cell membrane is atmospheric, i.e. zero. The time constant for the exponential decay is t_{c} = (εϕ)^{−1}. However, analysis using Equation 21 indicates that the magnitude of the final constant value after the exponential decay is different, P_{C} + P_{A}, when the pressure within the apoplasm is not atmospheric (see Eq. 22). This result may be verified by conducting stress relaxation experiments in which the magnitude of P_{A} can be changed. The measured magnitude of P_{I} after the exponential decay should change with the magnitudes of P_{A} as described by Equation 22. If so, the results will validate Equations 21 and 22 and provide insight into the role of P_{A} in stress relaxation experiments.
Additional analysis indicates that if the turgor pressure remains constant (clamped) a semiinstantaneous decrease in the magnitude of P_{A} elicits a semiinstantaneous increase in elastic expansion of the wall followed by an increase in irreversible expansion rate of the wall (Eq. 24; Fig. 3A). Similarly, if the turgor pressure remains constant (clamped), a semiinstantaneous increase in the magnitude of P_{A} elicits a semiinstantaneous elastic contraction followed by a decrease in irreversible expansion rate of the wall (Eq. 25; Fig. 3B). Previous analytical and experimental research conducted on isolated single algal cells demonstrates that a semiinstantaneous increase in turgor pressure produced with a pressure probe will elicit a semiinstantaneous elastic expansion followed by an increase in expansive growth rate (^{Proseus et al., 1999}, ^{2000}). This expansive growth behavior is similar to that described for a semiinstantaneous decrease in the magnitude of P_{A}. Also, it is demonstrated that a semiinstantaneous decrease in turgor pressure produced with the pressure probe will elicit a semiinstantaneous elastic contraction followed by a decrease in expansive growth rate (^{Proseus et al., 1999}, ^{2000}). This expansive growth behavior is similar to that described for a semiinstantaneous increase in the magnitude of P_{A}. The predicted behaviors (described by Eqs. 24 and 25; Fig. 3) can be verified with experiments in which the expansive growth rate is measured before and after a semiinstantaneous decrease and increase in the magnitude of P_{A}, while maintaining a constant turgor pressure. The pressure probe (^{Hüsken et al., 1978}; ^{Steudle, 1993}; ^{Tomos and Leigh, 1999}) may be used to clamp the turgor pressure at a constant magnitude. In order to measure the expansive growth rate while clamping the turgor pressure, it may be helpful to use single isolated cells such as algal internode cells or fungal sporangiophores. Then the pressure in the surrounding water (for algal cells) or in the air (for sporangiophores) could be decreased or increased to simulate a decreased or increased in the pressure within the apoplasm.
Prior analyses address the affect of negative pressure within the apoplasm on growth of cells in plant tissue (^{Calbo and Pessoa, 1994}; ^{Pessoa and Calbo, 2004}), and it is argued that the negative pressure interferes with the growth rate. In their analyses, the Lockhart equation [Eq. 2 without the term for elastic deformation, (1/ε) dP/dt] is modified to account for negative pressure within the apoplasm. Because their derived equations do not have a term that explicitly represents elastic deformation, their equations and results are not directly comparable to those obtained here. Also, the equations derived by ^{Calbo and Pessoa (1994)} and ^{Pessoa and Calbo (2004)} cannot explicitly address timedependent changes in turgor pressure, water uptake, expansive growth, wall deformations, and pressure within the apoplasm that are evaluated here.
It is concluded that transient changes in turgor pressure, water uptake rate, and expansive growth rate occur after step changes in the magnitude of the pressure within the apoplasm. It is also concluded that changes in the magnitude of the turgor pressure cause pressure changes within the apoplasm. The transient changes are essentially complete in approximately four time constants; 4 t_{c} = 4 [ε (ϕ + L)]^{−1}. In addition, it is concluded that the magnitude of the pressure within the apoplasm can alter the magnitude of the turgor pressure after the exponential decay during a stress relaxation experiment but does not alter the time constant of the exponential decay. Last, it is concluded that if the turgor pressure is clamped, a semiinstantaneous decrease and increase in the pressure within the apoplasm will elicit expansive growth behavior that is similar to that obtained by a semiinstantaneous increase and decrease in turgor pressure, respectively.
Overall, it is concluded that the pressure within the apoplasm is an important variable that must be measured and/or controlled, along with the turgor pressure, in analyses of water transport and expansive growth of plant cells in tissues and organs. Future research should address how the magnitude of relevant biophysical variables and relevant chemical reactions are affected by lower and higher pressures within cell walls. Also, knowing that spatial differences in tissue properties can produce gradients that affect the growth behavior of tissues and organs, future research should address how the magnitudes of relevant biophysical variables are spatially distributed within growing tissues and organs.
I thank Elena L. Ortega for her valuable comments concerning the mathematical solutions and the manuscript.
References
Boyer JS. (Year: 1967) Matric potentials of leaves. Plant Physiol42: 213–21716656497  
Boyer JS. (Year: 2001) Growthinduced water potentials originate from wall yielding during growth. J Exp Bot52: 1483–148811457908  
Boyer JS. (Year: 2009) Cell wall biosynthesis and the molecular mechanism of plant enlargement. Funct Plant Biol36: 383–394  
Boyer JS,Silk WK. (Year: 2004) Hydraulics of plant growth. Funct Plant Biol31: 761–773  
Calbo AG,Pessoa JDC. (Year: 1994) A plant growth reanalysis. An extension of Lockhart’s equation to multicellular plants. R Bras Fisiol Veg6: 83–89  
Cosgrove DJ. (Year: 1985) Cell wall yield properties of growing tissue: evaluation by in vivo stress relaxation. Plant Physiol78: 347–35616664243  
Cosgrove DJ. (Year: 1987) Wall relaxation in growing stems: comparison of four species and assessment of measurement techniques. Planta171: 266–27811539726  
Cosgrove DJ. (Year: 2005) Growth of the plant cell wall. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol6: 850–86116261190  
Geitmann A,Ortega JKE. (Year: 2009) Mechanics and modeling of plant cell growth. Trends Plant Sci14: 467–47819717328  
Hüsken D,Steudle E,Zimmermann U. (Year: 1978) Pressure probe technique for measuring water relations of cells in higher plants. Plant Physiol61: 158–16316660252  
Kramer PJ. (Year: 1932) The absorption of water by root systems of plants. Am J Bot19: 148–164  
Koch GW,Sillett SC,Jennings GM,Davis SD. (Year: 2004) The limits to tree height. Nature428: 851–85415103376  
Lewicka S. (Year: 2006) General and analytic solutions of the Ortega equation. Plant Physiol142: 1346–134917151137  
Lockhart JA. (Year: 1965) An analysis of irreversible plant cell elongation. J Theor Biol8: 264–2755876240  
Molz FJ,Boyer JS. (Year: 1978) Growthinduced water potentials in plant cells and tissues. Plant Physiol62: 423–42916660530  
Molz FJ,Ikenberry E. (Year: 1974) Water transport through plant cells and cell walls: theoretical development. Soil Sci Soc Am J38: 699–704  
Murphy R,Ortega JKE. (Year: 1995) A new pressure probe method to determine the average volumetric elastic modulus of cells in plant tissue. Plant Physiol107: 995–100512228417  
Murphy R,Ortega JKE. (Year: 1996) A study of the stationary volumetric elastic modulus during dehydration and rehydration of stems of pea seedlings. Plant Physiol110: 1309–131612226262  
Nonami H,Boyer JS. (Year: 1987) Origin of growthinduced water potential : Solute concentration is low in apoplast of enlarging tissues. Plant Physiol83: 596–60116665294  
Nonami H,Boyer JS. (Year: 1993) Direct demonstration of a growthinduced water potential gradient. Plant Physiol102: 13–1912231794  
Nonami H,Hashimoto Y. (Year: 1996) Negative pressure in the apoplast of elongating tissue induces water uptake for cell elongation in tissuecultured plants. Acta Hortic440: 594–599  
Ortega JKE. (Year: 1985) Augmented growth equation for cell wall expansion. Plant Physiol79: 318–32016664396  
Ortega JKE. (Year: 1990) Governing equations for plant cell growth. Physiol Plant79: 116–121  
Ortega JKE. (Year: 1994) Plant and fungal cell growth: governing equations for cell wall extension and water transport. Biomimetics2: 215–227  
Ortega JKE. (Year: 2004) A quantitative biophysical perspective of expansive growth for cells with walls. Pandalai SG, ed, Recent Research Development in Biophysics. , Vol 3Transworld Research Network, Kerala, India, pp 297–324.  
Ortega JKE,Keanini RG,Manica KJ. (Year: 1988) Pressure probe technique to study transpiration in Phycomyces sporangiophores. Plant Physiol87: 11–1416666084  
Ortega JKE,Smith ME,Erazo AJ,Espinosa MA,Bell SA,Zehr EG. (Year: 1991) A comparison of cellwallyielding properties for two developmental stages of Phycomyces sporangiophores: determination by invivo creep experiments. Planta183: 613–619  
Ortega JKE,Zehr EG,Keanini RG. (Year: 1989) In vivo creep and stress relaxation experiments to determine the wall extensibility and yield threshold for the sporangiophores of Phycomyces. Biophys J56: 465–47519431745  
Passioura JB,Boyer JS. (Year: 2003) Tissue stresses and resistance to water flow conspire to uncouple the water potential of the epidermis from that of the xylem of elongating plant stems. Funct Plant Biol30: 325–334  
Pessoa JDC,Calbo AG. (Year: 2004) Apoplasm hydrostatic pressure on growth of cylindrical cells. Braz J Plant Physiol16: 17–24  
Proseus TE,Ortega JKE,Boyer JS. (Year: 1999) Separating growth from elastic deformation during cell enlargement. Plant Physiol119: 775–7849952474  
Proseus TE,Zhu GL,Boyer JS. (Year: 2000) Turgor, temperature and the growth of plant cells: using Chara corallina as a model system. J Exp Bot51: 1481–149411006300  
Ray PM,Green PB,Cleland RE. (Year: 1972) Role of turgor in plant cell growth. Nature239: 163–164  
Serpe MD,Matthews MA. (Year: 1992) Rapid changes in cell wall yielding of elongating Begonia argenteoguttata L. leaves in response to changes in plant water status. Plant Physiol100: 1852–185716653208  
Serpe MD,Matthews MA. (Year: 2000) Turgor and cell wall yielding in dicot leaf growth in response to changes in relative humidity. Aust J Plant Physiol27: 1131–1140  
Steudle E. (Year: 1993) Pressure probe techniques: principles and application to studies of water and solute relations at the cell, tissue and organ level. Smith JAC,Griffiths H, eds, Water Deficits: Plant Responses from Cell to Community. BIOS Scientific Publishers, Oxford, pp 73–86.  
Tang AC,Boyer JS. (Year: 2008) Xylem tension affects growthinduced water potential and daily elongation of maize leaves. J Exp Bot59: 753–76418349050  
Tomos AD,Leigh RA. (Year: 1999) The pressure probe: a versatile tool in plant cell physiology. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol50: 447–47215012216  
Wiegers BS,Cheer AY,Silk WK. (Year: 2009) Modeling the hydraulics of root growth in three dimensions with phloem water sources. Plant Physiol150: 2092–210319542299 
Figures
Article Categories:

Previous Document: Functional elucidation of a key contact between tRNA and the large ribosomal subunit rRNA during dec...
Next Document: SHORTROOT and SCARECROW regulate leaf growth in Arabidopsis by stimulating Sphase progression of t...