Document Detail

Planned caesarean section for women with a twin pregnancy.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22161406     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
BACKGROUND: Twin pregnancies are associated with increased perinatal mortality, mainly related to prematurity, but complications during birth may contribute to perinatal loss or morbidity. The option of planned caesarean section to avoid such complications must therefore be considered. On the other hand, randomised trials of other clinical interventions in the birth process to avoid problems related to labour and birth (planned caesarean section for breech, and continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring), have shown an unexpected discordance between short-term perinatal morbidity and long-term neurological outcome. The risks of caesarean section for the mother in the current and subsequent pregnancies must also be taken into account.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the short- and long-term effects on mothers and their babies, of planned caesarean section for twin pregnancy.
SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 September 2011).
SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing a policy of caesarean section with planned vaginal birth for women with twin pregnancy.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two researchers independently assessed eligibility, quality and extracted data. Data were checked for accuracy.
MAIN RESULTS: One small trial with unconfirmed allocation concealment compared caesarean section with planned vaginal birth in 60 women with vertex/non-vertex twin pregnancies. There were no differences in perinatal outcome. The trial was too small to exclude the possibility of clinically meaningful benefits of either approach. There is one additional trial currently ongoing.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of robust evidence to guide clinical advice regarding the method of birth for twin pregnancies. Women should be informed of possible benefits and risks of either approach, including short-term and long-term consequences for both mother and babies. Future research should aim to provide unbiased evidence, including long-term outcomes.
G Justus Hofmeyr; Jon F Barrett; Caroline A Crowther
Related Documents :
10725986 - Anticoagulant therapy of pregnant patients with prosthetic heart valves: rationale for ...
12632426 - Randomized study of subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin plus aspirin versus intra...
9620096 - Controversies in antithrombotic therapy for patients with mechanical heart valves.
12152146 - Activated protein c resistance associated with maternal floor infarction treated with l...
2110406 - Coagulation profile of dairy cattle in the periparturient period.
21406496 - The clinical utility of measuring complement and anti-dsdna antibodies during pregnancy...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Review     Date:  2011-12-07
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Cochrane database of systematic reviews     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1469-493X     ISO Abbreviation:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev     Publication Date:  2011  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-12-13     Completed Date:  2012-01-30     Revised Date:  2014-08-17    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100909747     Medline TA:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  CD006553     Citation Subset:  IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Cesarean Section / adverse effects,  methods*
Pregnancy Outcome*
Pregnancy, Twin*
Grant Support
10/4001/02//Department of Health; SRP/10/4001/02//Department of Health

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Mirtazapine versus other antidepressive agents for depression.
Next Document:  Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma.