Document Detail

Pitch discrimination accuracy in musicians vs nonmusicians: an event-related potential and behavioral study.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  15551089     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Previously, professional violin players were found to automatically discriminate tiny pitch changes, not discriminable by nonmusicians. The present study addressed the pitch processing accuracy in musicians with expertise in playing a wide selection of instruments (e.g., piano; wind and string instruments). Of specific interest was whether also musicians with such divergent backgrounds have facilitated accuracy in automatic and/or attentive levels of auditory processing. Thirteen professional musicians and 13 nonmusicians were presented with frequent standard sounds and rare deviant sounds (0.8, 2, or 4% higher in frequency). Auditory event-related potentials evoked by these sounds were recorded while first the subjects read a self-chosen book and second they indicated behaviorally the detection of sounds with deviant frequency. Musicians detected the pitch changes faster and more accurately than nonmusicians. The N2b and P3 responses recorded during attentive listening had larger amplitude in musicians than in nonmusicians. Interestingly, the superiority in pitch discrimination accuracy in musicians over nonmusicians was observed not only with the 0.8% but also with the 2% frequency changes. Moreover, also nonmusicians detected quite reliably the smallest pitch changes of 0.8%. However, the mismatch negativity (MMN) and P3a recorded during a reading condition did not differentiate musicians and nonmusicians. These results suggest that musical expertise may exert its effects merely at attentive levels of processing and not necessarily already at the preattentive levels.
Mari Tervaniemi; Viola Just; Stefan Koelsch; Andreas Widmann; Erich Schröger
Related Documents :
17585889 - Deviant matters: duration, frequency, and intensity deviants reveal different patterns ...
17716919 - Cognitive neurophysiology: beyond averaging.
2912469 - Comparison of the geometric and the contrast models of similarity by presentation of vi...
16012619 - Rejection of stimulus-related meg artifacts using independent component analysis.
2453329 - Frequency and location specificity of the human vertex n1 wave.
19764169 - Morphological changes in the middle latency response using maximum length sequence stim...
21358899 - Increasing seat belt use in service vehicle drivers with a gearshift delay.
10652689 - Hearing loss among construction workers in edmonton, alberta, canada.
8613799 - The effect of efferent stimulation on basilar membrane displacement in the basal turn o...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2004-11-13
Journal Detail:
Title:  Experimental brain research     Volume:  161     ISSN:  0014-4819     ISO Abbreviation:  Exp Brain Res     Publication Date:  2005 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2005-02-02     Completed Date:  2005-05-24     Revised Date:  2013-12-13    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0043312     Medline TA:  Exp Brain Res     Country:  Germany    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1-10     Citation Subset:  IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Acoustic Stimulation / methods*
Evoked Potentials, Auditory / physiology*
Pitch Discrimination / physiology*
Reaction Time / physiology*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  EMG, force and discharge rate analysis of human jaw reflexes in response to axial stimulation of the...
Next Document:  Predictive strategies in interception tasks: differences between eye and hand movements.