Document Detail


Physicians' personal malpractice experiences are not related to defensive clinical practices.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  8723176     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Whether personal malpractice experience is part of a tort signal prompting physicians to practice defensively is unclear. To explore this issue further, we assessed how physicians' malpractice experiences affect clinical decision making. We surveyed 1,540 physicians from four specialty groups (cardiologists, surgeons, obstetrician-gynecologists, and internists) using specialty-specific clinical scenarios. Physicians were in active private practice, were covered by a single malpractice insurer for five or more years, and worked in an eastern state. The net response rate was 54 percent (835 of 1,540) but measurable bias, based on practice characteristics, was negligible. Physicians evaluated clinical scenarios that were designed to maximize potential for finding positive defensive practices (extra tests and procedures). Then they rated how various factors influenced their decisions and answered questions on practice attitudes. The study compared management and testing recommendations among physicians with varying levels of malpractice exposure, which we defined in three separate ways. Participants were unaware of the study hypotheses. Physicians with greater malpractice experience showed no systematic differences in initial management choice or subsequent test recommendations. For example, similar percentages of internists in the top and bottom claims rate quartiles admitted a patient with syncope (78 percent versus 73 percent; p = 42), discharged a patient with nonspecific chest pain (80 percent versus 80 percent; p = .88), and delayed surgery in a patient with nonspecific changes on a electrocardiograph (58 percent versus 68 percent; p = .18). Attitudes about malpractice also did not differ with varying malpractice experience. Personal malpractice experience is not a predominant factor in the tort signal that prompts physicians to engage in defensive practices, to the extent that such practices exist.
Authors:
P A Glassman; J E Rolph; L P Petersen; M A Bradley; R L Kravitz
Related Documents :
22134186 - Variation in equine management factors between riding schools with high vs. low insuran...
10483636 - Effects of contextual interference and age on acquisition, retention, and transfer of m...
11177626 - Enhancing training efficiency and effectiveness through the use of dyad training.
11676716 - An overview of the australian physiotherapy association accredited practice data collec...
21913226 - Variation in practices and attitudes of clinicians assessing ptsd-related disability am...
1635466 - Eurosentinel: development of an international sentinel network of general practitioners.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of health politics, policy and law     Volume:  21     ISSN:  0361-6878     ISO Abbreviation:  J Health Polit Policy Law     Publication Date:  1996  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1996-10-04     Completed Date:  1996-10-04     Revised Date:  2008-11-21    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7609331     Medline TA:  J Health Polit Policy Law     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  219-41     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, West Los Angeles, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Cardiology / statistics & numerical data
Decision Making
Defensive Medicine / statistics & numerical data*
Female
General Surgery
Gynecology / statistics & numerical data
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health Services Research / methods
Humans
Internal Medicine
Male
Malpractice / legislation & jurisprudence*
Middle Aged
Obstetrics / statistics & numerical data
Physician's Practice Patterns / statistics & numerical data*
Physicians / psychology*,  statistics & numerical data
Questionnaires
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996 Summer;21(2):267-88   [PMID:  8723178 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Measuring defensive medicine using clinical scenario surveys.
Next Document:  The use of low-osmolar contrast agents: technological change and defensive medicine.