| Physicians' perceptions of teratogenic risk associated with radiography and CT during early pregnancy. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 15100102 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine family physicians' and obstetricians' perceptions of the risk of major fetal malformations associated with exposure to radiation from radiography and CT during early pregnancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Structured questionnaires were sent to 400 family physicians and 100 obstetricians selected randomly across Ontario, Canada. The physicians were informed about the 1-3% baseline risk for major malformations and were asked about their perceptions of the risk to the fetus associated with an abdominal radiograph and an abdominal CT scan during early pregnancy and whether they would recommend a therapeutic abortion after such exposure. RESULTS: Fifty-five percent (218/400) of the family physicians and 69% (69/100) of the obstetricians responded to our questionnaire. Forty-four percent of family physicians estimated the risk associated with an abdominal radiograph to be 5% or greater, and 61% estimated the risk associated with an abdominal CT scan to be 5% or greater. Eleven percent of obstetricians estimated the risk associated with radiographs to be 5% or greater (p < 0.001), and 34% estimated the risk associated with CT scans to be 5% or greater (p < 0.001). Among family physicians, 1% recommended an abortion if the fetus was exposed to radiation from radiography and 6% after exposure to radiation from CT. None of the obstetricians recommended an abortion after exposure to radiation from an abdominal radiograph, but 5% recommended an abortion after exposure to radiation from an abdominal CT scan in early pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Our survey shows that physicians who care for pregnant women perceive the teratogenic risk associated with an abdominal radiograph and an abdominal CT scan to be unrealistically high during early pregnancy. This misperception could lead to increased anxiety among pregnant women seeking counseling and to unnecessary terminations of otherwise wanted pregnancies. This perception of high teratogenic risk associated with radiation could also lead to a delay in needed care of pregnant women. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Savithiri Ratnapalan; Nicole Bona; Kiran Chandra; Gideon Koren |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: AJR. American journal of roentgenology Volume: 182 ISSN: 0361-803X ISO Abbreviation: AJR Am J Roentgenol Publication Date: 2004 May |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2004-04-21 Completed Date: 2004-06-29 Revised Date: 2008-02-15 |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 7708173 Medline TA: AJR Am J Roentgenol Country: United States |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 1107-9 Citation Subset: AIM; IM |
Affiliation:
|
Division of Emergency Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave., Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada. |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Abnormalities, Radiation-Induced
/
etiology* Family Practice* Female Humans Obstetrics* Perception Pregnancy Questionnaires Risk Factors Tomography, X-Ray Computed / adverse effects* |
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Renal epithelial cells constitutively produce a protein that blocks adhesion of crystals to their su...
Next Document: Radiographic appearance and clinical outcome correlates in 26 patients with severe acute respiratory...