| Physician surveys to assess customary care in medical malpractice cases. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 12133145 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
OBJECTIVE: Physician experts hired and prepared by the litigants provide most information on standard of care for medical malpractice cases. Since this information may not be objective or accurate, we examined the feasibility and potential value of surveying community physicians to assess standard of care. DESIGN: Seven physician surveys of mutually exclusive groups of randomly selected physicians. SETTING: Iowa. PARTICIPANTS: Community and academic primary care physicians and relevant specialists. INTERVENTIONS: Included in each survey was a case vignette of a primary care malpractice case and key quotes from medical experts on each side of the case. Surveyed physicians were asked whether the patient should have been referred to a specialist for additional evaluation. The 7 case vignettes included 3 closed medical malpractice cases, 3 modifications of these cases, and 1 active case. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sixty-three percent of 350 community primary care physicians and 51% of 216 community specialists completed the questionnaire. For 3 closed cases, 47%, 78%, and 88% of primary care physician respondents reported that they would have made a different referral decision than the defendant. Referral percentages were minimally affected by modifying patient outcome but substantially changed by modifying patient presentation. Most physicians, even those whose referral decisions were unusual, assumed that other physicians would make similar referral decisions. For each case, at least 65% of the primary care physicians disagreed with the testimony of one of the expert witnesses. In the active case, the response rate was high (71%), and the respondents did not withhold criticism of the defendant doctor. CONCLUSIONS: Randomly selected peer physicians are willing to participate in surveys of medical malpractice cases. The surveys can be used to construct the distribution of physician self-reported practice relevant to a particular malpractice case. This distribution may provide more information about customary practice or standard of care than the opinion of a single physician expert. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Arthur Hartz; Joshua Lucas; Timothy Cramm; Michael Green; Suzanne Bentler; John Ely; Steven Wolfe; Paul James |
Related Documents
:
|
15836545 - Barriers to translating emerging genetic research on smoking into clinical practice. pe... 10418535 - Domestic violence and primary care. attitudes, practices, and beliefs. 11814175 - The generalist's patient and the subspecialist. 8882045 - Determinants of physician confidence in the primary care management of musculoskeletal ... 11534475 - Improving the preparticipation exam process. 15298555 - Monitoring response to treatment in asthma management: food for thought. |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Journal of general internal medicine Volume: 17 ISSN: 0884-8734 ISO Abbreviation: J Gen Intern Med Publication Date: 2002 Jul |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2002-07-22 Completed Date: 2002-09-19 Revised Date: 2009-11-18 |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 8605834 Medline TA: J Gen Intern Med Country: United States |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 546-55 Citation Subset: IM |
Affiliation:
|
College of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242-1097, USA. authur-hartz@uiowa.edu |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Expert Testimony* Feasibility Studies Female Health Care Surveys* Humans Iowa Male Malpractice / legislation & jurisprudence* Primary Health Care / legislation & jurisprudence*, standards* Quality of Health Care / standards* Reproducibility of Results |
| Grant Support | |
ID/Acronym/Agency:
|
2T35HL07485-21/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS; 5D32PE10195-02/PE/BHP HRSA HHS; PD15 PE87007/PE/BHP HRSA HHS |
| Comments/Corrections | |
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Learning about screening using an online or live lecture: does it matter?
Next Document: Receipt of nutrition and exercise counseling among medical outpatients with psychiatric and substanc...