| Philosophy and WEIRD intuition. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 20546653 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
From Plato to the present, philosophers have relied on intuitive judgments as evidence for or against philosophical theories. Most philosophers are WEIRD, highly educated, and male. The literature reviewed in the target article suggests that such people might have intuitions that differ from those of people in other groups. There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that they do. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Stephen Stich |
Related Documents
:
|
1652033 - Neurological problems in chronic alcoholics. 2676823 - The current literature on inpatient psychotherapy. 15007283 - The challenges of managing dysphagia in brain-injured patients. |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article Date: 2010-06-15 |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: The Behavioral and brain sciences Volume: 33 ISSN: 1469-1825 ISO Abbreviation: Behav Brain Sci Publication Date: 2010 Jun |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2010-06-29 Completed Date: 2010-10-01 Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 7808666 Medline TA: Behav Brain Sci Country: England |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 110-1 Citation Subset: IM |
Affiliation:
|
Department of Philosophy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-1107, USA. sstich@ruccs.rutgers.edu |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Female Humans Judgment* Male Philosophy* Research Personnel Sex Factors |
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: What is really wrong with a priori claims of universality? Sampling, validity, process level, and th...
Next Document: Development: Evolutionary ecology's midwife.