Document Detail

Pharmacokinetic Comparison of Acetaminophen Elixir Versus Suppositories in Vaccinated Infants (Aged 3 to 36 Months): A Single-Dose, Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel-Group Design.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23351277     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
BACKGROUND: Because of practical problems and ethical concerns, few studies of the pharmacokinetics (PK) of acetaminophen (ACET) in infants have been published. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to compare the PK of an ACET rectal suppository with a commercially available ACET elixir to complete a regulatory obligation to market the suppository. This study was not submitted previously because of numerous obstacles related to both the investigators and the commercial entities associated with the tested product. METHODS: Thirty infants (age 3-36 months) prescribed ACET for either fever, pain, or postimmunization prophylaxis of fever and discomfort were randomized to receive a single 10- to 15-mg/kg ACET dose either as the rectal suppository or oral elixir. Blood was collected at selected times for up to 8 hours after administration. ACET concentrations were measured by using a validated HPLC method, and PK behavior and bioavailability were compared for the 2 preparations. RESULTS: All 30 infants enrolled were prescribed ACET for postimmunization prophylaxis. PK samples were available in 27 of the 30 enrolled infants. Subject enrollment (completed in January 1995) was rapid (8.3 months) and drawn entirely from a vaccinated infant clinic population. There were no statistically significant differences between the subjects (elixir, n = 12; suppository, n = 15) in either mean (SD) age (10.0 [6.3] vs 12.4 [8.1] months), weight (8.6 [2.3] vs 9.4 [2.4] kg), sex (7 of 12 males vs 7 of 15 males), or racial distribution (5 white, 5 black, and 2 biracial vs 4 white and 11 black) between the 2 dosing groups (oral vs rectal, respectively). The oral and rectal preparations produced similar, rapid peak concentrations (T(max), 1.16 vs 1.17 hours; P = 0.98) and elimination t(½) (1.84 vs 2.10 hours; P = 0.14), respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between either C(max) (7.65 vs 5.68 μg/mL) or total drug exposure (AUC(0-∞), 23.36 vs 20.45 μg-h/mL) for the oral versus rectal preparations. There were no serious treatment-related effects noted. Delays in submitting this work for publication were the result of a number of investigator and sponsor issues despite the study's positive outcome. CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant differences were found between the rates or extent of absorption of the suppository and elixir preparations in this small, infant population. Both preparations were well tolerated. Vaccinated infants were a useful population in which to conduct a PK study of this antipyretic, analgesic product. Delays in publishing pediatric trials can occur as a result of a number of issues even when results are positive.
Philip D Walson; Mark Halvorsen; James Edge; Marcel J Casavant; Michael T Kelley
Related Documents :
11083377 - Phagocyte activation in preterm infants following premature rupture of the membranes or...
576877 - Urine solute excretion in growing low-birth-weight infants.
10088987 - Assessment of bone turnover in term and preterm newborns at birth: measurement of urina...
24650397 - Bilirubin uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase variation is a genetic basis of b...
18762327 - A differential effect of 2 probiotics in the prevention of eczema and atopy: a double-b...
7110737 - Hyperglycemia in very low birth weight infants: a common iatrogenic problem.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2013-1-22
Journal Detail:
Title:  Clinical therapeutics     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1879-114X     ISO Abbreviation:  Clin Ther     Publication Date:  2013 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-1-28     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7706726     Medline TA:  Clin Ther     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.
Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Columbus Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio(⁎). Electronic address:
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  ciliaFA: a research tool for automated, high-throughput measurement of ciliary beat frequency using ...
Next Document:  Cost effectiveness of Iran national plasma contract fractionation program.