Document Detail

Permanent pacemakers in older persons.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  10484258     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
OBJECTIVE: To review (1) the physiologic changes of aging that may lead to the need for a permanent pacemaker; (2) the current standard indications for pacemaker implantation as reported in expert guidelines; (3) newer investigational uses of pacemakers; (4) advances in pacemaker technology; and (5) cost-effectiveness of permanent pacing. DATA SOURCES: Computer-assisted search of the English language literature (MEDLINE database), manual search of articles bibliographies, and review of data provided by a major pacemaker manufacturer. DESIGN: Pertinent articles were reviewed and data extracted. Studies and data involving older persons were emphasized, and these data were extracted and presented. RESULTS: Abnormalities in impulse generation and conduction are common in older people and form the substrate for the need of pacemaker implantation. Pacemaker use is high in older people, with an estimated 70 to 80% of all permanent pacemakers implanted in individuals aged 65 years and older. The hemodynamic changes of aging include a reduction of ventricular compliance and increased contribution of atrial contraction to ventricular filling. Pacemakers that maintain synchrony between atria and ventricles may, therefore, be particularly advantageous in older adults. Recent studies have validated this theoretical reasoning. Chronotropic incompetence is common in older people, and rate responsive ventricular pacing has been shown to improve quality of life compared with fixed rate devices in older patients. Sequential, dual chamber pacemakers reduce the symptoms of pacemaker syndrome and recurrences of atrial fibrillation in certain groups of patients. Potential utility of permanent pacing is being investigated in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction, markedly prolonged atrioventricular conduction time, hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy, and after cardiac transplantation. Biventricular pacing as therapy for severe heart failure is in the very early phases of investigation. Newer implantable pacemakers provide a host of technological options but are somewhat more expensive and require more frequent follow-up. Controversies still exist regarding the need for pacemakers in certain clinical conditions but are decreasing as new high quality studies are completed. CONCLUSIONS: Permanent pacing is highly cost-effective, safe, and simple to perform. Pacemakers are implanted in patients with sinus node dysfunction, acquired (both native and postsurgical) atrioventricular block, some forms of neurally mediated syndromes, fascicular blocks, and, occasionally, for the prevention of supraventricular or ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Although pacemakers are implanted in individuals of all ages, they are most often utilized in older adults; it is estimated that 70 to 80% of all pacemakers are implanted in patients 65 years of age or older. This is attributable to an increase in abnormalities of impulse generation and conduction with advancing age. Dual chamber pacemakers that maintain synchrony between atria and ventricles are preferable in older patients because of the increased contribution of atrial contraction to ventricular filling in this age group. This theoretical advantage has been confirmed by prospective studies in limited patient subgroups.
G Gregoratos
Related Documents :
15030788 - A southpaw joins the roster: the role of the zebrafish nodal-related gene southpaw in c...
25468508 - Is clopidogrel better than aspirin following breakthrough strokes while on aspirin? a r...
508448 - Assessment of endocardial leads for permanent cardiac pacing.
6199768 - Myopotential interference with a ddd pacemaker--report of a case.
2130848 - Implantation of the automatic cardioverter-defibrillator.
1837318 - Time course of released atrial natriuretic peptide after acute myocardial infarction.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Review    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of the American Geriatrics Society     Volume:  47     ISSN:  0002-8614     ISO Abbreviation:  J Am Geriatr Soc     Publication Date:  1999 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1999-09-28     Completed Date:  1999-09-28     Revised Date:  2008-03-10    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7503062     Medline TA:  J Am Geriatr Soc     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1125-35     Citation Subset:  IM    
Cardiology Consultation Services, UCSF Stanford Medical Center, San Francisco, CA 94143-0327, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Aging / physiology
Arrhythmias, Cardiac / classification,  therapy*
Atrial Fibrillation / therapy
Heart Block / classification,  therapy
Heart Conduction System / physiology
Heart Ventricles
Pacemaker, Artificial* / economics,  standards,  statistics & numerical data,  utilization
Practice Guidelines as Topic

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Randomized controlled trial of nurse case management of frail older people.
Next Document:  Structural anthropometric measurements for wheelchair mobile adults.