Document Detail

Perioperative Risk Assessment in Robotic General Surgery: Lessons Learned From 884 Cases at a Single Institution.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22508668     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
OBJECTIVE: To assess factors associated with morbidity and mortality following the use of robotics in general surgery. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: University of Illinois at Chicago. Patients and INTERVENTION: Eight hundred eighty-four consecutive patients who underwent a robotic procedure in our institution between April 2007 and July 2010. Main Outcomes Measures  Perioperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: During the study period, 884 patients underwent a robotic procedure. The conversion rate was 2%, the mortality rate was 0.5%, and the overall postoperative morbidity rate was 16.7%. The reoperation rate was 2.4%. Mean length of stay was 4.5 days (range, 0.2-113 days). In univariate analysis, several factors were associated with increased morbidity and included either patient-related (cardiovascular and renal comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3, body mass index [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared] <30, age ≥70 years, and malignant disease) or procedure-related (blood loss ≥500 mL, transfusion, multiquadrant operation, and advanced procedure) factors. In multivariate analysis, advanced procedure, multiquadrant surgery, malignant disease, body mass index of less than 30, hypertension, and transfusion were factors significantly associated with a higher risk for complications. American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3 or greater, age 70 years or older, cardiovascular comorbidity, and blood loss of 500 mL or more were also associated with increased risk for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the robotic approach for general surgery can be achieved safely with low morbidity and mortality. Several risk factors have been identified as independent causes for higher morbidity and mortality. These can be used to identify patients at risk before and during the surgery and, in the future, to develop a scoring system for the use of robotic general surgery.
Nicolas C Buchs; Pietro Addeo; Francesco M Bianco; Veronica Gorodner; Subhashini M Ayloo; Enrique F Elli; José Oberholzer; Enrico Benedetti; Pier C Giulianotti
Related Documents :
22533998 - Adoption of laparoscopy for elective colorectal resection: a report from the surgical c...
22869908 - Ulnar nerve transposition using a mini-invasive approach: case series of 30 patients.
22629668 - Surgical drainage and post operative lavage of large abdominal abscesses in six mature ...
22374288 - Argon plasma coagulation as an alternative treatment for bronchopleural fistulas develo...
24505688 - Inter-operative trajectory registration for endoluminal video synchronization: applicat...
17573828 - Ultrasound-guided liver biopsy in real life: comparison of same-day prebiopsy versus re...
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2012-4-16
Journal Detail:
Title:  Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1538-3644     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2012 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-4-17     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9716528     Medline TA:  Arch Surg     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery (Drs Buchs, Addeo, Bianco, Ayloo, Elli, and Giulianotti) and Transplantation (Drs Gorodner, Oberholzer, and Benedetti), and Department of Surgery (Drs Buchs, Addeo, Bianco, Gorodner, Ayloo, Elli, Oberholzer, Benedetti, and Giulianotti), University of Illinois at Chicago.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Better Look Into the Latest Trends.
Next Document:  Overcoming the Challenges of Single-Incision Cholecystectomy With Robotic Single-Site Technology.