Document Detail

Pericardiocentesis practice in the United Kingdom.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  18036168     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
BACKGROUND: Pericardial effusions frequently present challenging clinical dilemmas. Whether or not to drain an effusion, and if so by what method, are two common decisions facing cardiologists. We performed a survey to evaluate pericardiocentesis practice in the United Kingdom (UK). METHODS: A total of 640 questionnaires were sent to all cardiologists in the UK Directory of Cardiology in March 2003. RESULTS: A total of 274 (43%) completed questionnaires were returned, 88% from consultants, equally distributed between tertiary referral centres and district general hospitals. More than 1500 procedures were performed, largely using a paraxiphoid approach (89%). Clinical tamponade was the commonest indication for pericardiocentesis (83%). However, the majority of respondents (69%) considered echocardiographic features alone an indication for pericardiocentesis, even in the absence of clinical tamponade. The commonest perceived indications for drainage were right ventricular diastolic collapse and right atrial collapse (69% and 33% of respondents respectively). For guidance, 82% use echocardiography, either alone or with fluoroscopy or the electrocardiogram (ECG) injury trace. 11% employ fluoroscopy alone or with the ECG injury trace. The remaining 11% stated that they would use the ECG injury trace alone or use no guidance. Using the ECG injury trace alone is said by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines to offer an inadequate safeguard. Reported complications included ventricular puncture (n = 12, 0.8%) and hepatic damage (n = 4, 0.3%). CONCLUSION: Pericardiocentesis practice varies substantially in the UK. Many cardiologists would perform pericardiocentesis based on echocardiographic features alone. 11% of cardiologists use guidance that is considered inadequate by the ESC guidelines.
S Balmain; N M Hawkins; M R MacDonald; F G Dunn; M C Petrie
Related Documents :
15710288 - Thyrotoxicosis-an uncommon cause of heart failure.
9244018 - The peri-operative use of the oesophageal doppler monitor in patients undergoing corona...
16175028 - Noninvasive techniques for measurements of cardiac output.
2721038 - Pericardial effusion early in acute myocardial infarction.
16492288 - Cardioprotective strategies to improve long-term outcomes following coronary artery byp...
12551868 - Long-term results after the glycoprotein iib/iiia inhibitor abciximab in unstable angin...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Multicenter Study     Date:  2007-11-23
Journal Detail:
Title:  International journal of clinical practice     Volume:  62     ISSN:  1742-1241     ISO Abbreviation:  Int. J. Clin. Pract.     Publication Date:  2008 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2008-09-29     Completed Date:  2009-07-01     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9712381     Medline TA:  Int J Clin Pract     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1515-9     Citation Subset:  IM    
Department of Cardiology, New Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Cardiology / methods*
Great Britain
Pericardial Effusion / etiology,  therapy
Pericardiocentesis / adverse effects,  methods*,  standards
Professional Practice / standards*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Xanthelasma is not associated with increased risk of carotid atherosclerosis in normolipidaemia.
Next Document:  Profiling and classification tree applied to renal epithelial tumours.