Document Detail

Perforation into gut by ventriculoperitoneal shunts: A report of two cases and review of the literature.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21430848     Owner:  NLM     Status:  PubMed-not-MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
We report two cases of gastrointestinal perforation by ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts and review the literature on the topic. The time interval between shunt surgery and detection of bowel perforation is minimum in infants and increases with age. Sigmoid and transverse colon followed by stomach are the most frequent sites of gastrointestinal perforations by VP shunts.
Authors:
Abdul Hai; Atia Z Rab; Imran Ghani; Muhammad F Huda; Abdul Q Quadir
Related Documents :
628728 - Strongyloides stercoralis colitis: findings in four cases.
17267888 - Fulminant postcesarean clostridium difficile pseudomembranous colitis.
19546848 - Co-existing thyrotropin secreting pituitary adenoma and low grade glioma: clinical cons...
10319078 - Prolactinoma manifesting with symptomatic hydrocephalus.
17631088 - A population-based study of cardiac malformations and outcomes associated with dextroca...
16995958 - Multiple laryngeal foreign bodies composed of dried fish vertebral bones: a case report.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons     Volume:  16     ISSN:  1998-3891     ISO Abbreviation:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg     Publication Date:  2011 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-03-24     Completed Date:  2011-07-14     Revised Date:  2013-05-29    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101179870     Medline TA:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg     Country:  India    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  31-3     Citation Subset:  -    
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg
Journal ID (publisher-id): JIAPS
ISSN: 0971-9261
ISSN: 1998-3891
Publisher: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd, India
Article Information
Copyright: © Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
open-access:
Print publication date: Season: Jan–Mar Year: 2011
Volume: 16 Issue: 1
First Page: 31 Last Page: 33
ID: 3047774
PubMed Id: 21430848
Publisher Id: JIAPS-16-31
DOI: 10.4103/0971-9261.74521

Perforation into gut by ventriculoperitoneal shunts: A report of two cases and review of the literature
Abdul Haiaff1
Atia Z. Rabaff1
Imran Ghaniaff1
Muhammad F. Hudaaff1
Abdul Q. Quadiraff1
Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India
Correspondence: Address for correspondence: Dr. Abdul Hai, Aleem Manzil, Sir Syed Nagar, Civil Line, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, 202002, India abdulhaiqadar@yahoo.com

INTRODUCTION

The peritoneal end of the ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt has been associated with complications such as pseudocyst formation, perforations of hollow viscus, penetration into solid organs and abdominal wall and protrusion outside body. We report two cases of bowel perforation by VP shunts.


CASE REPORTS
Case 1

A 9-month-old male had undergone the right-sided VP shunt (Chhabra-slit-in-spring silicone shunt) procedure 7 months back for congenital hydrocephalus. He presented to us with complaints that the child protruded a white tube per anus on defecation for past 15 days with clear fluid dripping from it. On examination, the child was afebrile, alert and had no neck rigidity, and the abdomen was soft. On rectal examination, there was a white tube coming from beyond the reach of finger. Total leukocyte count (TLC) was 7200/cumm. An ultrasonography (USG) abdomen was normal. The sigmoidoscopy showed VP shunt protruding into the colon at 18 cm from the anal verge. The child was operated and the shunt was cut at abdominal surface through a small incision. The rest of the distal tube was extracted per rectum. The proximal tube was taken out as external drainage. On antibiotics, the child improved. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture done after 1 month was sterile and so a revision of shunt was done on the left side. The child was asymptomatic at 3 years follow-up.

Case 2

A 3-year-old male, who underwent VP shunt 1 year ago for congenital hydrocephalus presented with similar complaints as the above patient [Figure 1]. On examination, the child was stable except that proctoscopy showed VP shunt protruding into the rectum at about 12 cm from anal verge. TLC was 6400/cumm, CSF was sterile and the USG abdomen was normal. The child was operated and managed similarly as the above patient with successful outcome and is on regular follow-up.


DISCUSSION

Perforation of bowel by VP shunts is rare and the incidence is only 0.1-0.7% of shunt surgery.[1] A search of the literature revealed a total of 94 patients. More than half, i.e., 49 cases were reported in the age group 0-10 years. Our both patients belonged to this group. Thirty-four were male, 26 were females while in 34 cases sex was not mentioned. The duration of time between VP shunt surgery and detection of bowel perforation was found minimum (mean, 4.86 months) in the 0-1 year age group and found increasing with age with an overall mean duration of 24.8 months [Table 1].

The possible factors responsible for this complication are thin bowel wall in children, sharp and stiff end of the VP shunt,[2, 3] use of trocar by operating surgeons,[4] chronic irritation by the shunt,[5] previous surgery, infection and silicone allergy.[6] Congenital hydrocephalus (n = 33) was the most common diagnosis followed by infective etiology (10), cysts/tumors (5), normal pressure hydrocephalus (5), intracerebral hemorrhage (4), tubercular (3), and trauma (1) while in 33 cases diagnosis was not mentioned.

The total number of patients found to have anal protrusion of VP shunts was 55 (58.5%) including our two patients [Table 2]. Similarly nine cases (9.6%) of oral extrusion were seen.[2, 712] While 7 (7.45%) patients had peritonitis and 12 (12.8%) had meningitis separately, three patients developed both (3.2%).[4, 13]

The diagnosis was obvious in patients presenting with spontaneous extrusion of a whitish tube while defecating through which clear fluid dripped. Eight patients were subjected to a contrast study through distal shunt (shuntogram) which opacified the bowel confirming the diagnosis[1] while computed tomogram (CT) scan of abdomen showed the shunt in bowel lumen along with peritonitis if present.[6, 14, 15] CT scan of head showing pneumocephalus in patients with VP shunts could clinch the diagnosis of bowel perforation when other causes were ruled out.[16] Patients with VP shunts who developed meningitis by “unusual pathogens” such as gram-negative and anaerobic organisms as confirmed by CSF examinations were suspected to have bowel perforation and were further investigated.[13] In patients with oral extrusion, upper GI endoscopy helped localize the site of perforation.[2] Finally in undiagnosed patients, an exploratory laparotomy was done.[10, 11]

Out of 94 patients, the exact site of perforation in gastrointestinal tract (GIT) was mentioned in 49 (52.1%) patients. In six out of nine patients with oral extrusion of VP shunt, the site was localized to stomach[2, 710] and in two patients, jejunum.[11] In rest of the cases without oral extrusion,[1, 6, 1620] the site of perforation in bowel was as follows: Caecum (2), ascending colon (1), transverse colon (6), splenic flexure (1), descending colon (5), sigmoid (7), rectum (4), and unknown sites in colon (12).[14, 21] The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures were positive in most of the cases.[1, 17]

Bowel perforation in patients with VP shunt should be considered with gram-negative meningitis or abdominal symptoms. The optimum treatment of such a patient would be decided by the presence of features of sepsis, perforation peritonitis, or intraperitoneal abscess. In a patient with simple bowel perforation and no other complications like our both patients, a formal exploratory laparotomy is not required. The shunt should be disconnected at abdominal wall and the lower end should be removed through the rectum by colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy/proctoscopy.[15] The distal end of VP shunt should not be pulled back into the peritoneal cavity to prevent contamination of the tract. External ventriculostomy should be established at least for 3 weeks and patient should be put on broad spectrum antibiotics to prevent infection of CSF.[2, 4, 15] After repeated CSF cultures are sterile, patient should undergo repeat VP shunt on the opposite side.[22] In patients with bowel perforation peritonitis, they should undergo exploratory laparotomy with removal of shunt, thorough lavage and primary closure of the bowel wall.[1, 4, 10, 16, 21, 20, 23]

In our review, a total of five patients (5.32%) died. One patient each died of peritonitis[13] and intractable seizures,[23] two of continued bacterial ventriculitis[7] and in one patient who died of meningitis, autopsy revealed stomach perforation by VP shunt. The time relationship and the site of perforation in GI tract by VP shunt have never been studied in the past.


CONCLUSION

In symptomatic VP shunted patients, suspicion of bowel perforation should be kept high, if they develop abdominal symptoms or gram-negative or anaerobic meningitis. The duration of time between shunt surgery and detection of perforation was found minimum in infants and increasing with age. Most of the patients presented with asymptomatic passage of a tube per anus. Sigmoid and transverse colon followed by stomach are the most frequent sites of GI perforations. In a patient with simple bowel perforation and no other complications, a formal laparotomy is not required while in patients with intraabdominal complications, urgent laparotomy should be undertaken. If detected on time and managed properly, the results are good.


Notes

Source of Support: Nil

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

REFERENCES
1. Robert BS,Michael HL,Richard AR. Colonic perforation by ventriculoperitoneal shuntSurg NeurolYear: 19862517373941987
2. Park CK,Wang KC,Seo JK,Cho BK. Transoral protrusion of a peritoneal catheter: a case report and literature reviewChilds Nerv SystYear: 200016184910804056
3. Adeloye A. Protrusion of ventriculo peritoneal shunt through the anus: report of two casesEast Afr Med JYear: 19977433799337017
4. Nebi Y,Nejmi K,Cahide Y,Hüseyin Ç,Sevil AY. Anal protrusion of ventriculo-peritoneal shunt catheter: report of two infantsJ Pediatr NeurolYear: 200422414
5. Jamjoom AB,Rawlinson JN,Kirkpatrick JN. Passage of tube per rectum: an unusual complication of a ventriculoperitoneal shuntBr J Clin PractYear: 19904452562282320
6. John DB,Brodkey JS,Schaefer IK. Colonic Perforation by ventriculoperitoneal shunt tubing: A case of suspected silicone allergySurg NeurolYear: 1998492149428890
7. Berhouma M,Messerer M,Houissa S,Khaldi M. Transoral protrusion of a peritoneal catheter: a rare complication of VP shuntsPediatr NeurosurgYear: 2008441697118230935
8. Jun M,Toshihiro M,Tomohiko K,Kazuo T. Peritoneal shunt tube migration into the stomachNeurol Med Chir (Tokyo)Year: 200545543616247243
9. Murali R,Ravikumar V. Transoral migration of peritoneal end of ventriculoperitoneal shunt: A case report of a rare complication and review of literatureJ Pediatr NeurosciYear: 200831668
10. Mario AV,Luis A,Luis D,Rafael M,Luis J,José M. Gastric Perforation due to ventriculo-peritoneal ShuntPediatr NeurosurgYear: 19942119247803310
11. Odebode TO. Jejunal perforation and peroral extrusion of a peritoneal shunt catheterBr J NeurosurgYear: 200721235617453796
12. Kothari PR,Shankar G,Kulkarni B. Extruded ventriculo-peritoneal shunt: An unusual complicationJ Indian Assoc Pediatr SurgYear: 2006112556
13. Abdel WMI. E.coli meningitis as an indicator of intestinal perforation by V-P shunts tubeNeurosurg RevYear: 19982119479795961
14. Hok-Nam L,Tze-CT,Fung-CC. Transanal protrusion of VP shuntSurg PractYear: 200612936
15. Sathyanarayana S,Wylen EL,Baskaya MK,Nanda A. Spontaneous bowel perforation after ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery: case report and a review of 45 casesSurg NeurolYear: 2000543889611165622
16. Shetty PG,Fatterpekar GM,Sahani DV,Shroff MM. Pneumocephalus secondary to colonic perforation by VP shunt catheterBr J RadiolYear: 199972704510624329
17. Ogasawara K,Kaneko U,Ishibashi T,Sakimura K. Abscess of the abdominal wall following penetration of the descending colon: a rare complication of a ventriculoperitoneal shuntNo Shinkei GekaYear: 19901897582146523
18. Hornig GW,Shillito JJ. Intestinal perforation by peritoneal shunt tubing: report of two casesSurg NeurolYear: 199033288902183378
19. Akcora B,Serarslanb Y,Sangun O. Bowel Perforation and Transanal Protrusion of a Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt CatheterPediatr NeurosurgYear: 2006421293116465086
20. Martínez HM,Barrera RC,Villanueva SE,Zavala MJ. Colonic perforation as a complication of ventriculoperitoneal shunt: a case reportTech ColoproctolYear: 200610353517115308
21. Ghritlaharey RK,Budhwani KS,Shrivastava DK,Gupta G,Kushwaha AS,Chanchlani R,et al. Trans-anal protrusion of VP shunt catheter with silent bowel perforation: report of ten cases in childrenPediatr Surg IntYear: 2007235758017387494
22. Nasib CD,Thappa DR,Mohit A,Yogeshwar M,Goswamy HL. Silent bowel perforation and transanal prolapse of a ventriculoperitoneal shuntPediatr Surg IntYear: 20001694510663848
23. Schulhof LA,Worth RM,Kalsbeck JE. Bowel perforation due to peritoneal shunt - A report of seven cases and review of the literatureSurg NeurolYear: 1975326591154249

Figures

[Figure ID: F1]
Figure 1 

VP shunt protruding from anus of patient in case 2



Tables
[TableWrap ID: T1] Table 1 

Mean duration of time from VP shunt surgery to GI perforation



[TableWrap ID: T2] Table 2 

Patient characteristics in the literature




Article Categories:
  • Case Report

Keywords: Anal protrusion, bowel perforation, hydrocephalus, oral extrusion, ventriculoperitoneal shunt.

Previous Document:  Ingested metallic foreign body lodged in the appendix.
Next Document:  Small field dose delivery evaluations using cone beam optical computed tomography-based polymer gel ...