Document Detail


Percutaneous left ventricular support for high-risk PCI and cardiogenic shock: who gets what?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22406055     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Temporary use of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device (PLVAD) may be beneficial in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and those with cardiogenic shock (CS).
METHODS: Seventy-four consecutive patients undergoing high-risk PCI and those with CS receiving intraaortic balloon pump (IABP), TandemHeart (TH), or Impella device (IMP) were enrolled. Patient undergoing high-risk PCI (n=57) and those treated for CS (n=17) were analyzed as separate cohorts. Patients undergoing IABP-assisted PCI were compared to those undergoing PLVAD (TH and IMP)-assisted PCI. The primary end point was in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events, and the secondary end point was in-hospital vascular complications.
RESULTS: For the high-risk PCI cohort (n=57), 22 received PLVAD and 35 received IABP. Patients receiving IABP were younger and less likely to have a prior myocardial infarction (MI) and less likely to be on dialysis compared to those receiving PLVAD support. Patients receiving PLVAD support had a higher baseline Syntax score, had a higher prevalence of unprotected left main disease, underwent treatment of more coronary lesions, received more coronary stents, and more likely received drug-eluting stents compared to those receiving IABP support. The primary and secondary end points were similar between both groups. For the CS cohort (n=17), 4 received PLVAD and 13 received IABP. Patients receiving PLVAD support were more likely to have a prior MI, had a lower ejection fraction, underwent treatment of more coronary lesions, and received more coronary stents compared to those receiving IABP support. The primary and secondary end points were similar between both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: IABP compared with PLVAD use for high-risk PCI and CS is associated with significantly different baseline patient, clinical, procedural, and angiographic characteristics. In-hospital clinical outcome was similar between both groups in both the high-risk PCI and the CS cohorts. When physicians have access to each of these devices, short-term clinical outcome appears to be similar.
Authors:
Roshni Shah; Alexcis Thomson; Kimberly Atianzar; Keith Somma; Anilkumar Mehra; Leonardo Clavijo; Ray V Matthews; David M Shavelle
Related Documents :
12634875 - Beta-blocker therapy in heart failure.
12937355 - Beta-blocker therapy and severe heart failure: myth or reality?
22770365 - Early and simple detection of diastolic dysfunction during weaning from mechanical vent...
22245035 - Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol is a practical predictor of long-term cardiac ...
6862805 - Changes in ventricular fibrillation threshold induced by contrast agents during acute c...
23998715 - Ecg - still the best for selecting patients for crt.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article     Date:  2012-03-07
Journal Detail:
Title:  Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions     Volume:  13     ISSN:  1878-0938     ISO Abbreviation:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med     Publication Date:    2012 Mar-Apr
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-04-16     Completed Date:  2012-08-21     Revised Date:  2012-09-19    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101238551     Medline TA:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  101-5     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Aged
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary*
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Heart Ventricles / physiopathology*
Heart-Assist Devices*
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Ischemia / complications,  therapy*
Prospective Studies
Risk Factors
Shock, Cardiogenic / etiology,  prevention & control*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Stay focussed - muffle that resonant bass!
Next Document:  Intravascular ultrasound insights from the Cobalt Chromium Stent With Antiproliferative for Restenos...