Document Detail


Pelvic floor descent in females: comparative study of colpocystodefecography and dynamic fast MR imaging.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  10194705     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
The purpose of this study was to compare fast dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with colpocystodefecography (CCD) in the evaluation of pelvic floor descent in women. Thirty-five women with clinical evidence of pelvic floor descent were studied. A fast single-shot MR sequence was performed in the supine position during pelvic floor relaxation and during maximal pelvic strain. On the same day, a dynamic CCD was performed with the patient seated on a stool-chair. The degree of descent of the bladder, vagina, and anorectal junction was evaluated as the vertical distance between the pubococcygeal line and the bladder base, the vaginal vault, and the anorectal junction, respectively. A bulge of more than 3 cm measured as the distance between the extended line of the anterior border of the anal canal and the tip of the rectocele was interpreted as a rectocele. MRI was compared with CCD during maximal pelvic strain (CCD 1) and during voiding and defecation (CCD II). CCD was considered as the gold standard. Compared with clinical examination, CCD I showed a larger number of involved compartments, except for the middle compartment. CCD II was superior to clinical examination in all cases. In comparison with CCD I and especially CCD II, MRI had a lower sensitivity, especially for the anterior and middle compartment. Even four enteroceles seen on CCD II were not detected by MRI. When CCD I and CCD II were compared, a cystocele, a vaginal vault prolapse, an enterocele, and a rectocele were more readily seen on CCD II than with CCD I. When compared with CCD, supine dynamic MRI is unreliable, especially in the anterior and middle compartment. Even in the detection of enteroceles CCD was superior to MRI. In general, the best results with MRI can be expected for evaluation of the rectum.
Authors:
D Vanbeckevoort; L Van Hoe; R Oyen; E Ponette; D De Ridder; J Deprest
Related Documents :
8015805 - Passive step-back technique.
21765305 - Combination of a low-tube-voltage technique with hybrid iterative reconstruction (idose...
16715215 - Volumetry of human molars with flat panel-based volume ct in vitro.
17320715 - A comparison of three ni-ti rotary instruments in apical transportation.
8916265 - Medical image transmission via communication satellite: evaluation of ultrasonographic ...
18629915 - Imaging the propagation of viruses.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI     Volume:  9     ISSN:  1053-1807     ISO Abbreviation:  J Magn Reson Imaging     Publication Date:  1999 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1999-05-27     Completed Date:  1999-05-27     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9105850     Medline TA:  J Magn Reson Imaging     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  373-7     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Colposcopy / methods
Defecation
Defecography / methods
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods*
Middle Aged
Pelvic Floor / pathology,  radiography
Rectal Prolapse / diagnosis*
Sensitivity and Specificity
Urinary Bladder Diseases / diagnosis*,  radiography
Urination
Uterine Prolapse / diagnosis*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  MRI of liver metastases: limitation of spleen-liver model in optimizing pulse sequences.
Next Document:  Pelvic floor descent: dynamic MR imaging using a half-Fourier RARE sequence.