Document Detail

Pelvic angiography for recurrent traumatic pelvic arterial hemorrhage.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  16385296     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
BACKGROUND: Angiography is the gold standard for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic arterial hemorrhage associated with pelvic fractures. In most cases, a single angiogram with embolization is adequate to control pelvic arterial hemorrhage. However, a small subset of patients, require repeat pelvic angiogram to evaluate and treat recurrent hemorrhage. This study seeks to define this population and determine clinical predictors of recurrent hemorrhage. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case control study comparing patients with traumatic pelvic fracture undergoing repeated pelvic angiogram versus a single angiogram between the years 1995 and 2000. Stepwise logistic regression was used to identify the independent predictors of recurrent hemorrhage. RESULTS: In the years studied, 556 patients underwent a pelvic angiogram to evaluate for pelvic arterial hemorrhage associated with pelvic fractures. Among these, 42 (7.5%) patients underwent a second angiogram for suspected recurrent hemorrhage. In comparison to the initial angiogram, the source of bleeding on the repeat angiogram occurred at a new bleeding site in 68%, at a previously embolized site in 18%, and both in 14%. Significant risk factors for recurrent pelvic arterial hemorrhage included hypotension or transfusion of >2 U of blood per hour before the initial angiogram, pubic symphysis widening, and more than two injured arteries requiring embolization (p < 0.05). Of these, more than two injured arteries requiring embolization (odds ratio, 16.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.9-88) and transfusion of >2 U of blood per hour (odds ratio, 6.9; 95% confidence interval,1.9-25) were independent predictors of recurrent hemorrhage. CONCLUSION: Angiographic control of traumatic pelvic arterial hemorrhage is highly successful. However, recurrent pelvic arterial hemorrhage does occur. We identified a subgroup of patients with pelvic fractures who are at increased risk of recurrent pelvic arterial hemorrhage and should be considered for early repeat angiography for signs of ongoing hemorrhage.
David Gourlay; Eric Hoffer; Milton Routt; Eileen Bulger
Related Documents :
12535766 - Control of completeness and immediate detection of bleeding by a single laser-doppler f...
1791946 - Clinical signs associated with megadolichobasilar artery anomaly.
3929416 - Cisternal and lumbar csf concentration of arachidonate metabolites in vasospasm followi...
19066106 - The clinical significance of acute brain injury in subarachnoid hemorrhage and opportun...
1839236 - Atherosclerotic rabbit iliac arteries: comparison of balloon angioplasty and laser-assi...
11384076 - Coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass is safe and contributes to ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Journal of trauma     Volume:  59     ISSN:  0022-5282     ISO Abbreviation:  J Trauma     Publication Date:  2005 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2005-12-30     Completed Date:  2006-02-03     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0376373     Medline TA:  J Trauma     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1168-73; discussion 1173-4     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Department of Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98104, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Acetabulum / blood supply,  injuries,  radiography
Fractures, Closed / radiography*
Hemorrhage / radiography*
Injury Severity Score
Logistic Models
Middle Aged
Pelvic Bones / injuries*
Pelvis / blood supply*,  radiography*
Pubic Bone / blood supply,  injuries,  radiography
Risk Factors

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Risk and benefit of intravenous contrast in trauma patients with an elevated serum creatinine.
Next Document:  Routine follow-up imaging is unnecessary in the management of blunt hepatic injury.