Document Detail


Peer review: a view based on recent experience as an author and reviewer.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22918342     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Peer review is an important stage in academic publishing, as a form of quality control to maintain the integrity of both the articles and the journals they appear in. However, the confidential nature of the relationship between reviewer and author does not necessarily benefit the system; with some reviewers using their anonymity to give unnecessary, injudicious comment. This paper explores the motives behind the reviewer's comments and how peer review could be improved by openness and honesty.
Authors:
R K F Clark
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  British dental journal     Volume:  213     ISSN:  1476-5373     ISO Abbreviation:  Br Dent J     Publication Date:  2012 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-08-24     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7513219     Medline TA:  Br Dent J     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  153-4     Citation Subset:  D; IM    
Affiliation:
Prosthetic Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute, London, SE1 9RT.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Distribution of Metals in Surface Sediments from a Small River Flowing Through Urban and Agricultura...
Next Document:  Oral diagnosis and treatment planning: part 4. Non-carious tooth surface loss and assessment of risk...