| Peer review: a view based on recent experience as an author and reviewer. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 22918342 Owner: NLM Status: In-Data-Review |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
Peer review is an important stage in academic publishing, as a form of quality control to maintain the integrity of both the articles and the journals they appear in. However, the confidential nature of the relationship between reviewer and author does not necessarily benefit the system; with some reviewers using their anonymity to give unnecessary, injudicious comment. This paper explores the motives behind the reviewer's comments and how peer review could be improved by openness and honesty. |
| | |
Authors:
|
R K F Clark |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: British dental journal Volume: 213 ISSN: 1476-5373 ISO Abbreviation: Br Dent J Publication Date: 2012 Aug |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2012-08-24 Completed Date: - Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 7513219 Medline TA: Br Dent J Country: England |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 153-4 Citation Subset: D; IM |
Affiliation:
|
Prosthetic Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute, London, SE1 9RT. |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
|
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Distribution of Metals in Surface Sediments from a Small River Flowing Through Urban and Agricultura...
Next Document: Oral diagnosis and treatment planning: part 4. Non-carious tooth surface loss and assessment of risk...