Document Detail

Peer influence on students' estimates of performance: social comparison in clinical rotations.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23323658     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Context  During clinical rotations, students move from one clinical situation to another. Questions exist about students' strategies for coping with these transitions. These strategies may include a process of social comparison because in this context it offers the student an opportunity to estimate his or her abilities to master a novel rotation. These estimates are relevant for learning and performance because they are related to self-efficacy. We investigated whether student estimates of their own future performance are influenced by the performance level and gender of the peer with whom the student compares him- or herself. Methods  We designed an experimental study in which participating students (n = 321) were divided into groups assigned to 12 different conditions. Each condition entailed a written comparison situation in which a peer student had completed the rotation the participant was required to undertake next. Differences between conditions were determined by the performance level (worse, similar or better) and gender of the comparison peer. The overall grade achieved by the comparison peer remained the same in all conditions. We asked participants to estimate their own future performance in that novel rotation. Differences between their estimates were analysed using analysis of variance (anova). Results  Students' estimates of their future performance were highest when the comparison peer was presented as performing less well and lowest when the comparison peer was presented as performing better (p < 0.001). Estimates of male and female students in same-gender comparison conditions did not differ. In two of three opposite-gender conditions, male students' estimates were higher than those of females (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05, respectively). Conclusions  Social comparison influences students' estimates of their future performance in a novel rotation. The effect depends on the performance level and gender of the comparison peer. This indicates that comparisons against particular peers may strengthen or diminish a student's self-efficacy, which, in turn, may ease or hamper the student's learning during clinical rotations. The study is limited by its experimental design. Future research should focus on students' comparison behaviour in real transitions.
A N Janet Raat; Jan B M Kuks; E Ally van Hell; Janke Cohen-Schotanus
Related Documents :
24157468 - Concussion reporting rates at the conclusion of an intercollegiate athletic career.
21044538 - Effect of initial status and growth in pseudoword reading on spanish reading comprehens...
10875178 - Epa2000: a multilingual, programmable computer assessment of off-line metacognition in ...
24556778 - Students' perspectives on the fourth year of medical school: a mixed-methods analysis.
19642148 - Student-run health clinic: novel arena to educate medical students on systems-based pra...
24850938 - Online virtual-patient cases versus traditional problem-based learning in advanced phar...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Medical education     Volume:  47     ISSN:  1365-2923     ISO Abbreviation:  Med Educ     Publication Date:  2013 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-01-17     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7605655     Medline TA:  Med Educ     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  190-7     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
© Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013.
Center for Research and Innovation in Medical Education, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands Institute for Medical Education, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Adjusting medical school admission: assessing interpersonal skills using situational judgement tests...
Next Document:  Divergence in student and educator conceptual structures during auscultation training.