| Peer-based control in self-managing teams: Linking rational and normative influence with individual and group performance. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 21895352 Owner: NLM Status: Publisher |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
The authors use a multilevel framework to introduce peer-based control as a motivational state that emerges in self-managing teams. The authors specifically describe how peer-based rational control, which is defined as team members perceiving the distribution of economic rewards as dependent on input from teammates, extends and interacts with the more commonly studied normative control force of group cohesion to explain both individual and collective performance in teams. On the basis of data from 587 factory workers in 45 self-managing teams at 3 organizations, peer-based rational control corresponded with higher performance for both individuals and collective teams. Results further demonstrated that the rational and normative mechanism of peer-based control interacted to explain performance at both the individual and team levels. Increased peer-based rational control corresponded with higher individual and collective performance in teams with low cohesion, but the positive effects on performance were attenuated in cohesive teams. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved). |
| | |
Authors:
|
Greg L Stewart; Stephen H Courtright; Murray R Barrick |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: JOURNAL ARTICLE Date: 2011-9-5 |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: The Journal of applied psychology Volume: - ISSN: 1939-1854 ISO Abbreviation: - Publication Date: 2011 Sep |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2011-9-7 Completed Date: - Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 0222526 Medline TA: J Appl Psychol Country: - |
Other Details:
|
Languages: ENG Pagination: - Citation Subset: - |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
|
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Centrality and charisma: Comparing how leader networks and attributions affect team performance.
Next Document: Facial affect processing and depression susceptibility: Cognitive biases and cognitive neuroscience.