Document Detail


Pediatric clinical visual electrophysiology: a survey of actual practice.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  17109158     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: Survey the actual clinical practice of pediatric visual electrophysiology. The electrophysiologists surveyed were members of the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV). METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire with 55 items about visual evoked potential (VEP) and electroretinogram (ERG) testing of pediatric patients was sent to ISCEV members. The survey queried personnel, facilities, referral patterns and conduct of tests. RESULTS: Nearly all respondents (94%) had advanced scientific or clinical degrees or both, and most (96%) worked in academic or medical facilities. Of the 71 respondents, 68 tested patients 12 years or younger, and nearly all of those performed both VEPs and ERGs. However, fewer than a third did high volume (>10/month) testing of infants and young children (< or =6 years). Eye care professionals and neurologists made the majority (57%) of the referrals, with the most common reason for referral being suspected visual impairment. Conduct of a pediatric test session often required more than one practitioner. For both VEP and ERG, more than 70% of respondents required at least 30 min for each test. The majority indicated that they followed the ISCEV standards for stimuli and data acquisition. Almost all (94%) reported using the ISCEV recommended VEP electrode configuration. For ERG, most (88%) used ocular contact electrodes (including contact lens, thread, foil and HK loop), but 12% used skin electrodes exclusively and some (17%) used skin electrodes at times. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric ERG and VEP testing is a labor intensive endeavor of highly trained professionals. ISCEV technical standards are typically met or exceeded, indicating that high quality testing of infants and children is feasible. Revision of the ISCEV ERG standard is necessary to bring actual practice into accord with evidence-based recommendations for infant testing.
Authors:
; Anne B Fulton; Jelka Brecelj; Birgit Lorenz; Anne Moskowitz; Dorothy Thompson; Carol A Westall
Related Documents :
12023058 - Presence of visual head tracking differentiates normal sighted from retinal degenerate ...
8610798 - Contrast sensitivity and other vision tests in the optic neuritis treatment trial.
17523048 - The visual performance test: indications for compensational visual rehabilitation train...
16255688 - Assessment of age-related maculopathy using subjective vision tests.
8792888 - Results of in vitro contracture testing of both parents of malignant hyperthermia susce...
3141168 - Enzyme immunoassay for the detection of giardia lamblia.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2006-11-16
Journal Detail:
Title:  Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology     Volume:  113     ISSN:  1573-2622     ISO Abbreviation:  Doc Ophthalmol     Publication Date:  2006 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2006-11-30     Completed Date:  2009-04-01     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0370667     Medline TA:  Doc Ophthalmol     Country:  Netherlands    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  193-204     Citation Subset:  IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Child
Child, Preschool
Electrophysiology* / standards
Electroretinography* / standards
Evoked Potentials, Visual*
Guideline Adherence
Humans
Infant
Pediatrics* / methods
Professional Practice*
Questionnaires
Referral and Consultation
Vision Disorders / diagnosis*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  ISCEV Standard for Clinical Electro-oculography (EOG) 2006.
Next Document:  The influence of luminance on the multifocal ERG.