Document Detail


Patient awareness and concern regarding pharmaceutical manufacturer interactions with doctors.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19383067     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to determine the general public's level of awareness of and degree of concern about the interactions between pharmaceutical manufacturers and doctors in Melbourne. This Internet was survey administered using Survey Monkey. METHODS: The participants in the study were employees of The Age Newspaper in Melbourne (n = 1524). Participants' self-reported levels of awareness and concern regarding pharmaceutical representatives' interactions with doctors and the resulting effect on the quality of care they receive were observed. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-four participants completed the questionnaire between 18 January and 8 February 2007. This was a response rate of 8.8%, and 40% reported a 'high level' of awareness of pharmaceutical marketing, whereas 59% reported believing that marketing influenced the prescribing behaviour of their doctors. Participants who reported that information provided by the pharmaceutical industry is inaccurate were significantly more likely to prefer a doctor who did not engage with pharmaceutical marketing (H(2) = 0.19, P < 0.05). There was a significant difference in perceived trustworthiness between academic sources of information and marketing based sources of information (T = 0.000, P < 0.05). The level of perceived trustworthiness of pharmaceutical marketing was significantly related to whether people wanted to be kept informed about pharmaceutical marketing activities (H(2) = 0.004, P < 0.05). Forty-eight per cent of respondents wanted to be informed about pharmaceutical marketing; 46.2% of these people would like this to be through disclosure in the form of an accredited identification system. If given a choice, 38.8% of respondents would choose a doctor who did not see pharmaceutical representatives over one that did. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of the sample surveyed was aware of pharmaceutical marketing, believed that it influenced prescribing practices and it was less trustworthy than academic sources of information, would like to be kept informed about industry interactions with their doctor and would prefer to see a doctor who did not receive visits from pharmaceutical marketing representatives.
Authors:
D Edwards; A Ballantyne
Related Documents :
17580507 - A comparative evaluation of current orthodontic miniscrew systems.
10248747 - The pre-employment inquiry guide.
22423157 - Fixing fistula.
19440127 - Use of the guide to physical therapist practice by pediatric physical therapists.
19042877 - Recognizing the need for evidence-based macro practices in organizational and community...
12537807 - An introduction to reproduction in pharaonic egypt.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Internal medicine journal     Volume:  39     ISSN:  1445-5994     ISO Abbreviation:  Intern Med J     Publication Date:  2009 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2009-04-22     Completed Date:  2009-08-03     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101092952     Medline TA:  Intern Med J     Country:  Australia    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  191-6     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Centre for Human Bioethics, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. danny.edwards@arts.monash.edu.au
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Australia
Awareness*
Bioethics
Conflict of Interest
Disclosure
Drug Industry / ethics*
Drug Utilization / ethics*
Ethics, Medical*
Ethics, Pharmacy*
Female
Humans
Interprofessional Relations / ethics*
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction
Physician's Practice Patterns
Physician's Role
Physician-Patient Relations
Prescription Drugs
Questionnaires
Trust
Young Adult
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Prescription Drugs

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Evaluation of the impact of breast cancer screening in South Australia.
Next Document:  Rare cause of dyspnoea.