Document Detail

Pancreatic Perfusion CT in Early Stage of Severe Acute Pancreatitis.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22518337     Owner:  NLM     Status:  PubMed-not-MEDLINE    
Early intensive care for severe acute pancreatitis is essential for improving SAP mortality rates. However, intensive therapies for SAP are often delayed because there is no ideal way to accurately evaluate severity in the early stages. Currently, perfusion CT has been shown useful to predict prognosis of SAP in the early stage. In this presented paper, we would like to review the clinical usefulness and limitations of perfusion CT for evaluation of local and systemic complications in early stage of SAP.
Yoshihisa Tsuji; Naoki Takahashi; Chiba Tsutomu
Related Documents :
1381437 - Collagen composition and ultrastructure of the so-called amianthoid fibres in palisaded...
1417137 - Preliminary observations of chondral abrasion in a canine model.
25394317 - Effect of indirect neural decompression through oblique lateral interbody fusion (olif)...
10406407 - Sonographic imaging of normal and osteoarthritic cartilage.
19914037 - Quantification of mitral regurgitation using high pulse repetition frequency three-dime...
21921277 - Redefinition of transient ischemic attack improves prognosis of transient ischemic atta...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2012-02-15
Journal Detail:
Title:  International journal of inflammation     Volume:  2012     ISSN:  2042-0099     ISO Abbreviation:  Int J Inflam     Publication Date:  2012  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-04-20     Completed Date:  2012-08-23     Revised Date:  2013-02-27    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101538188     Medline TA:  Int J Inflam     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  497386     Citation Subset:  -    
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Int J Inflam
Journal ID (publisher-id): IJI
ISSN: 2090-8040
ISSN: 2042-0099
Publisher: Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Article Information
Download PDF
Copyright © 2012 Yoshihisa Tsuji et al.
Received Day: 16 Month: 9 Year: 2011
Revision Received Day: 8 Month: 11 Year: 2011
Accepted Day: 10 Month: 11 Year: 2011
Print publication date: Year: 2012
Electronic publication date: Day: 15 Month: 2 Year: 2012
Volume: 2012E-location ID: 497386
ID: 3299226
PubMed Id: 22518337
DOI: 10.1155/2012/497386

Pancreatic Perfusion CT in Early Stage of Severe Acute Pancreatitis
Yoshihisa Tsuji1, 2I2
Naoki Takahashi2
Chiba Tsutomu1*
1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
2Division of Radiology Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN 55905, USA
Correspondence: *Chiba Tsutomu:
[other] Academic Editor: Marja-Leena Kylanpaa

1. Introduction

Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) is a fatal disease [1]. The Atlanta Symposium criteria for the severity of acute pancreatitis define SAP as acute pancreatitis with local complications (pancreatic necrosis, abscess, and pseudocysts) and/or with systemic complications (organ failure, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and severe metabolic disturbances) [2] (Figure 1). Both acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) and multiple-organ failure (MOF) have been shown to be significant prognostic factors [36]. Mortality rates for SAP patients developing ANP and MOF are 32% and 30%, respectively [7]. Early intensive care for SAP is essential for improving SAP mortality rates [810]. However, intensive therapies for SAP are often delayed because there is no ideal way to accurately evaluate severity in the early stages [1113].

Perfusion CT has been used for evaluation of various pancreatic diseases [1422]. Perfusion CT has been shown useful to predict prognosis of SAP in the early stage [17, 18]. In this presented paper, we would like to review the clinical usefulness and limitations of perfusion CT for evaluation of local and systemic complications in early stage of SAP.

2. Perfusion CT Technique

Previously published perfusion CT protocols are summarized in Table 1. Multidetector CT (MDCT) is essential for performing perfusion CT of pancreas. With a 4–64 slice MDCT scanner, perfusion CT scans are obtained with the patient in a stationary position. The craniocaudal CT scan coverage is limited to 20 to 32 mm (4 slices of 5 to 8 mm thickness). Therefore, scan location must be carefully chosen to cover as much of the pancreas as possible as it is often difficult to cover the entire pancreas. Since most pancreatic necrosis occurs in the neck region, it is probably uncommon to exclude the area of necrosis due to the scanning coverage limitation. With the use of a recently developed 256–320-slice MDCT scanners [19], craniocaudal coverage has increased to 80–160 mm. Alternative way to increase the craniocaudal coverage is by using the so-called shuttle or toggle mode. In this mode, similar to conventional CT scans, patient table moves back and forth as the multiple scans are performed.

First, noncontrast transaxial images of the upper abdomen are obtained using low-dose technique. This scan is performed to localize the pancreas, and it determines the scan range of the perfusion CT.

Perfusion CT is performed after a bolus injection of intravenous contrast material. Unlike conventional CT, the perfusion CT requires smaller dose (40–50 mL) of contrast material injected at a high rate (4–10 mL/sec). Higher concentration of contrast material (350–370 mgI/kg) is preferred [2325].

Perfusion CT images are obtained multiple times through the pancreas. In most of previous reports, scan interval ranges from 0.5 to 1.5 second, and the scan duration ranges from 30 to 150 seconds, respectively (Table 1). Total scan duration necessary for calculation of perfusion parameters may depend on the algorithm used. For example, maximum slope method needs shorter duration scan time than the deconvolution method [14, 19, 26]. Because the scan duration is long, the scans are usually performed under free breathing.

Perfusion CT scan is obtained at a low tube current (mAs) to reduce radiation dose. At 120 kV, mAs of 100 is commonly used. There is increased interest in the use of low tube voltage setting, as it reduces radiation dose and improves iodine contrast material conspicuity. In a smaller patient, the use of 100 kV or 80 kV is recommended. In a larger patient, the use of low-kV scan may result in noisy images due to photon deficiency.

2.1. Radiation Dose and Scan Parameters

Radiation dose is dependent on the tube current (mAs), tube voltage (kV), number of scans, and scan coverage [29]. Tube current (mAs) and tube voltage (kV) are largely dictated by the patient size to maintain adequate image quality. Radiation dose should be kept as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) by reducing the scanning parameter settings but achieving image dataset adequate for calculating CT perfusion parameters [27, 30]. Further study is necessary to optimize the scanning protocol.

From a European study, the effective dose of pancreatic perfusion CT was 3.54 mSv with 90 KV, 100 mAs, and 40 scans [17]. A study from Japan reported that mean radiation dose of pancreatic perfusion CT was approximately 204.8 mGy·cm (dose-length product (DLPw)), 3.07 mSv (effective dose), and 64 mGy (CT dose index volume (CTDIvol)) with 80 kV, 60 mAs, and 106 scans [27]. In the national survey, the radiation exposure of a single-phase abdominal CT was 13–25 mGy (CTDIvol) [31]. Therefore, the radiation dose of perfusion CT is slightly higher than that of biphasic (two phase), which is commonly used for pancreatic or liver imaging. Average abdominal transverse diameter of the Japanese patients in our experience was 32 cm, while transverse diameters of patients in the Unites States are usually larger [32]. Therefore, the radiation dose will likely be higher in the western countries

2.2. Perfusion CT Data Analysis

Pancreatic perfusion CT image data are analyzed by using perfusion CT analysis software. There are various perfusion algorithms to calculate perfusion parameters. Maximum slope method, deconvolution method, single-compartment method, and the Patlak method are commonly used perfusion algorithms. Which perfusion best suits in the evaluation of SAP is yet to be determined. As different perfusion algorithms are suited for different disease processes and require different scanning protocol, determination of scanning protocol and perfusion algorithms should be considered together. For example, maximum slope method may require shorter scanning duration, but higher rate of contrast injection is required, while deconvolution method may require longer scanning duration but slower rate of contrast injection rate [14, 26].

The software requires placement of small regions of interest (ROI) on an artery to generate arterial input function. Venous outflow function is required in deconvolution method. This process is required because the computer algorithm compares the shape and height of the time-density curve of each pixel of the pancreatic CT time series with shape and height of the arterial and/or venous time-density curves to calculate pancreatic perfusion parameters. Calculated pancreatic perfusion parameters are displayed using color maps [14].

3. Perfusion CT for Predicting Development of Pancreatic Necrosis in the Early Stage of Severe Acute Pancreatitis

Development of pancreatic necrosis is the critical event of acute pancreatitis that determines the prognosis of the patients. The overall mortality rate of acute pancreatitis is reported to be between 2.1% and 9.2% worldwide [1]. Pancreatic necrosis occurs in 10–15% of patients with SAP, with a mortality rate of 23% [1]. This rate is nearly twice that for patients with SAP who do not develop pancreatic necrosis (i.e., 11%) [1].

There is a report that dynamic contrast-enhanced CT is more accurate than either the Ranson criteria for pancreatitis mortality or the APACHE II scoring system in predicting the development of pancreatic necrosis [33]. However, the accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT in predicting necrosis at an early stage of SAP is not satisfactory [34]. The United Kingdom guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis, the most popular clinical guideline of acute pancreatitis, recommends that contrast-enhanced CT should be performed at day 3 or later after onset of SAP because of its low sensitivity of CT [11].

In our experience, perfusion CT performed within 3 days of onset of symptoms had a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 95.3% for predicting development of pancreatic necrosis [18]. The area of necrosis was depicted as area of pancreatic blood flow decreased by more than 19.3% of surrounding pancreatic parenchyma. The area of perfusion defect was commonly diagnosed by using pancreatic blood flow. The perfusion defects detected by perfusion CT reflected ischemia which was produced by vasospasms of the intrapancreatic arteries [35, 36].

4. Perfusion CT for Evaluating Systemic Blood Flow

Perfusion CT could be a useful tool to evaluate abnormal systemic circulation in early stage of SAP. Recent study by Whitcomb et al. showed that elevated serum angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) on admission is predictive of persistent organ failure in patients with sap [37]. Ang-2 is produced by damaged vessels and increases vascular permeability [38]. In our study, elevated serum Ang-2 is related with hyperdynamic state of systemic circulation [22]. In this study, perfusion CT parameter (τ) was calculated using single-compartment model [28, 39]. τ is a measure of the mean transit time of contrast material from upper abdominal aorta to pancreas; thus, this could be considered a surrogate of systemic circulation with a lower value indicating hyperdynamic state of systemic circulation [28]. In the result, significant correlation was found between τ and serum Ang-2 levels (P < 0.05); higher serum Ang-2 levels were associated with lower τ values (hyperdynamic state of systemic circulation).

Hepatic circulation abnormality has been reported in patients with SAP using Perfusion CT [40]. They reported that hepatic arterial perfusion is increased in the early stage of SAP as measured on dual-input maximum slope method.

5. Clinical Utility of Pancreatic Perfusion CT

Early diagnosis of pancreatic necrosis is very important in the treatment of patients with SAP. Current methods to predict early pancreatic necrosis or SAP is not satisfactory [1113]. Perfusion CT is a promising technique that allows accurate diagnosis of pancreatic necrosis. Early diagnosis allows prompt clinical decision such as transferring patients to ICU or institution of aggressive treatment such as anticoagulation therapy [41], continuous regional arterial infusion of antiprothrombin agent [8, 9], early fluid resuscitation [10], and molecular targeted therapy [42, 43].

6. Conclusion

Perfusion CT is a promising technique for diagnosis of local and systemic complications of SAP at an early stage.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

1. Sekimoto M,Takada T,Kawarada Y,et al. JPN Guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis: epidemiology, etiology, natural history, and outcome predictors in acute pancreatitisJournal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic SurgeryYear: 2006131102416463207
2. Bradley EL. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitisAnnales de ChirurgieYear: 19934765375418105746
3. Banks PA,Freeman ML,Fass R,et al. Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitisAmerican Journal of GastroenterologyYear: 2006101102379240017032204
4. Tenner S,Sica G,Hughes M,et al. Relationship of necrosis to organ failure in severe acute pancreatitisGastroenterologyYear: 199711338999039287982
5. Johnson CD,Abu-Hilal M. Persistent organ failure during the first week as a marker of fatal outcome in acute pancreatitisGutYear: 20045391340134415306596
6. Takahashi N,Papachristou GI,Schmit GD,et al. CT findings of walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN): differentiation from pseudocyst and prediction of outcome after endoscopic therapyEuropean RadiologyYear: 200818112522252918563416
7. Petrov MS,Shanbhag S,Chakraborty M,Phillips ARJ,Windsor JA. Organ failure and infection of pancreatic necrosis as determinants of mortality in patients with acute pancreatitisGastroenterologyYear: 2010139381382020540942
8. Takeda K,Matsuno S,Sunamura M,Kakugawa Y. Continuous regional arterial infusion of protease inhibitor and antibiotics in acute necrotizing pancreatitisAmerican Journal of SurgeryYear: 199617143943988604829
9. Piaścik M,Rydzewska G,Milewski J,et al. The results of severe acute pancreatitis treatment with continuous regional arterial infusion of protease inhibitor and antibiotic: a randomized controlled studyPancreasYear: 201039686386720431422
10. Warndorf MG,Kurtzman JT,Bartel MJ,et al. Early fluid resuscitation reduces morbidity among patients with acute pancreatitisClinical Gastroenterology and HepatologyYear: 20119870570921554987
11. Johnson CD. UK guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitisGutYear: 2005543iii1iii915831893
12. Bollen TL,Van Santvoort HC,Besselink MG,et al. The Atlanta Classification of acute pancreatitis revisitedBritish Journal of SurgeryYear: 200895162117985333
13. Chauhan S,Forsmark CE. The difficulty in predicting outcome in acute pancreatitisAmerican Journal of GastroenterologyYear: 2010105244344520139877
14. Miles KA,Griffiths MR. Perfusion CT: a worthwhile enhancement?British Journal of RadiologyYear: 20037690422023112711641
15. Tsushima Y,Kusano S. Age-dependent decline in parenchymal perfusion in the normal human pancreas: measurement by dynamic computed tomographyPancreasYear: 19981721481529700945
16. Abe H,Murakami T,Kubota M,et al. Quantitative tissue blood flow evaluation of pancreatic tumor: comparison between xenon CT technique and perfusion CT technique based on deconvolution analysisRadiation MedicineYear: 200523536437016342909
17. Bize PE,Platon A,Becker CD,Poletti PA. Perfusion measurement in acute pancreatitis using dynamic perfusion MDCTAmerican Journal of RoentgenologyYear: 2006186111411816357388
18. Tsuji Y,Yamamoto H,Yazumi S,et al. Perfusion computerized tomography can predict pancreatic necrosis in early stages of severe acute pancreatitisClinical Gastroenterology and HepatologyYear: 20075121484149217950676
19. Kandel S,Kloeters C,Meyer H,Hein P,Hilbig A,Rogalla P. Whole-organ perfusion of the pancreas using dynamic volume CT in patients with primary pancreas carcinoma: acquisition technique, post-processing and initial resultsEuropean RadiologyYear: 200919112641264619471941
20. d’Assignies G,Couvelard A,Bahrami S,et al. Pancreatic endocrine tumors: tumor blood flow assessed with perfusion CT reflects angiogenesis and correlates with prognostic factorsRadiologyYear: 2009250240741619095784
21. Park MS,Klotz E,Kim MJ,et al. Perfusion CT: noninvasive surrogate marker for stratification of pancreatic cancer response to concurrent chemo-And radiation therapyRadiologyYear: 2009250111011718984781
22. Watanabe T,Tsuji Y,Kodama Y,Isoda H,Yamamoto H,Chiba T. Relationship between serum angiopoietin-2 level and perfusion CT parameters in severe acute pancreatitisAmerican Journal of GastroenterologyYear: 2011106101859186121979214
23. Tsushima Y,Miyazaki M,Taketomi-Takahashi A,Endo K. Feasibility of measuring human pancreatic perfusion in vivo using imaging techniquesPancreasYear: 201140574775221562446
24. Sahani DV,Holalkere NS,Kambadakone A,Matthes K,Mino-Kenudson M,Brugge WR. Role of computed tomography perfusion in the evaluation of pancreatic necrosis and pancreatitis after endoscopic ultrasound-guided ablation of the pancreas in a porcine modelPancreasYear: 200938777578119465884
25. Miles KA. Perfusion CT for the assessment of tumour vascularity: which protocol?British Journal of RadiologyYear: 2003761S36S4215456712
26. Kishimoto M,Tsuji Y,Katabami N,et al. Measurement of canine pancreatic perfusion using dynamic computed tomography: influence of input-output vessels on deconvolution and maximum slope methodsEuropean Journal of RadiologyYear: 20097717518119616910
27. Tsuji Y,Koizumi K,Isoda H,et al. The radiological exposure of pancreatic perfusion computed tomographyPancreasYear: 2010394p. 541
28. Sheiman RG,Sitek A. Feasibility of measurement of pancreatic perfusion parameters with single-compartment kinetic model applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced CT imagesRadiologyYear: 2008249387888218840789
29. Goh V,Dattani M,Farwell J,et al. Radiation dose from volumetric helical perfusion CT of the thorax, abdomen or pelvisEuropean RadiologyYear: 20112197498121085968
30. Kambadakone AR,Sharma A,Catalano OA,Hahn PF,Sahani DV. Protocol modifications for CT perfusion (CTp) examinations of abdomen-pelvic tumors: impact on radiation dose and data processing timeEuropean RadiologyYear: 20112161293130021246200
31. Shrimpton PC,Hillier MC,Lewis MA,Dunn M. National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003British Journal of RadiologyYear: 20067994896898017213302
32. Yu L,Li H,Fletcher JG,McCollough CH. Automatic selection of tube potential for radiation dose reduction in CT: a general strategyMedical PhysicsYear: 201037123424320175486
33. Leung TK,Lee CM,Lin SY,et al. Balthazar computed tomography severity index is superior to Ranson criteria and APACHE II scoring system in predicting acute pancreatitis outcomeWorld Journal of GastroenterologyYear: 200511386049605216273623
34. Neoptolemos JP,Kemppainen EA,Mayer JM,et al. Early prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis by urinary trypsinogen activation peptide: a multicentre studyThe LancetYear: 2000355921919551960
35. Takeda K,Mikami Y,Fukuyama S,et al. Pancreatic ischemia associated with vasospasm in the early phase of human acute necrotizing pancreatitisPancreasYear: 2005301404915632698
36. Tsuji Y,Hamaguchi K,Watanabe Y,et al. Perfusion CT is superior to angiography in predicting pancreatic necrosis in patients with severe acute pancreatitisJournal of GastroenterologyYear: 2010451155116220623374
37. Whitcomb DC,Muddana V,Langmead CJ,et al. Angiopoietin-2, a regulator of vascular permeability in inflammation, is associated with persistent organ failure in patients with acute pancreatitis from the United States and GermanyAmerican Journal of GastroenterologyYear: 2010105102287229220461065
38. Fiedler U,Reiss Y,Scharpfenecker M,et al. Angiopoietin-2 sensitizes endothelial cells to TNF-α and has a crucial role in the induction of inflammationNature MedicineYear: 2006122235239
39. Sitek A,Sheiman RG. Small-bowel perfusion measurement: feasibility with single-compartment kinetic model applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced CTRadiologyYear: 2005237267067416244275
40. Koyasu S,Isoda H,Tsuji Y,et al. Hepatic arterial perfusion increases in the early stage of severe acute pancreatitis patients: evaluation by perfusion computed tomographyEuropean Journal of RadiologyYear: 2012811434621123016
41. Hackert T,Werner J,Uhl W,Gebhard MM,Büchler MW,Schmidt J. Reduction of ischemia/reperfusion injury by antithrombin III after experimental pancreas transplantationAmerican Journal of SurgeryYear: 20051891929715701500
42. Wang X,Li W,Niu C,Pan L,Li N,Li J. Thymosin alpha 1 is associated with improved cellular immunity and reduced infection rate in severe acute pancreatitis patients in a double-blind randomized control studyInflammationYear: 20113419820220549321
43. Tidswell M,Tillis W,Larosa SP,et al. Phase 2 trial of eritoran tetrasodium (E5564), a Toll-like receptor 4 antagonist, in patients with severe sepsisCritical Care MedicineYear: 2010381728319661804

Article Categories:
  • Review Article

Previous Document:  Carbohydrate Elimination or Adaptation Diet for Symptoms of Intestinal Discomfort in IBD: Rationales...
Next Document:  Cataract surgery in uveitis.